Multi-criteria selection of offshore wind farms: Case study for the Baltic States

Abstract This paper presents a multi-criteria selection approach for offshore wind sites assessment. The proposed site selection framework takes into consideration the electricity network’s operating security aspects, economic investment, operation costs and capacity performances relative to each potential site. The selection decision is made through Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), with an inherited flexibility that aims to allow end users to adjust the expected benefits accordingly to their respective and global priorities. The proposed site selection framework is implemented as an interactive case study for three Baltic States in the 2020 time horizon, based on real data and exhaustive power network models, taking into consideration the foreseen upgrades and network reinforcements. For each country the optimal offshore wind sites are assessed under multiple weight contribution scenarios, reflecting the characteristics of market design, regulatory aspects or renewable integration targets.

[1]  C. Amante,et al.  ETOPO1 arc-minute global relief model : procedures, data sources and analysis , 2009 .

[2]  Dionysios Latinopoulos,et al.  A GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation for wind farm site selection. A regional scale application in Greece , 2015 .

[3]  Xinyue Ye,et al.  A group-based spatial decision support system for wind farm site selection in Northwest Ohio , 2013 .

[4]  G. Sinden.  Characteristics of the UK wind resource: Long-term patterns and relationship to electricity demand , 2007 .

[5]  Beata Sliz-Szkliniarz,et al.  GIS-based approach for the evaluation of wind energy potential: A case study for the Kujawsko–Pomorskie Voivodeship , 2011 .

[6]  Ola,et al.  United Nations convention on the law of the sea , 2008 .

[7]  T. Saaty.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[8]  A. G. Dutton,et al.  An Offshore Wind Energy Geographic Information System (OWE-GIS) for assessment of the UK's offshore wind energy potential , 2016 .

[9]  J. C. Lam,et al.  A study of Weibull parameters using long-term wind observations , 2000 .

[10]  D. Weisser,et al.  A wind energy analysis of Grenada: an estimation using the 'Weibull' density function , 2003 .

[11]  Amy H. I. Lee,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making on strategic selection of wind farms , 2009 .

[12]  Kazim Baris Atici,et al.  A GIS-based Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis approach for wind power plant site selection , 2015 .

[13]  T. Saaty.  Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2000 .

[14]  M. S. García-Cascales,et al.  GIS-based onshore wind farm site selection using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods. Evaluating the case of Southeastern Spain , 2016 .

[15]  S. Hsu,et al.  Determining the power-law wind-profile exponent under near-neutral stability conditions at sea , 1994 .

[16]  Klaus D. Goepel,et al.  Implementing the Analytic Hierarchy Process as a Standard Method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Corporate Enterprises – a New AHP Excel Template with Multiple Inputs , 2013 .

[17]  Vasilis Fthenakis,et al.  GIS-based wind farm site selection using spatial multi-criteria analysis (SMCA): Evaluating the case for New York State , 2011 .

[18]  Abdolvahhab Fetanat,et al.  A novel hybrid MCDM approach for offshore wind farm site selection: A case study of Iran , 2015 .

[19]  Pece V. Gorsevski,et al.  A web-based participatory GIS (PGIS) for offshore wind farm suitability within Lake Erie, Ohio , 2015 .

[20]  Viktoria Neimane,et al.  Using Standard Deviation as a Measure of Increased Operational Reserve Requirement for Wind Power , 2008 .

[21]  John S. Irwin,et al.  A theoretical variation of the wind profile power-law exponent as a function of surface roughness and stability , 1979 .