Assessing occupational exposure to chemicals in an international epidemiological study of brain tumours.

The INTEROCC project is a multi-centre case-control study investigating the risk of developing brain cancer due to occupational chemical and electromagnetic field exposures. To estimate chemical exposures, the Finnish Job Exposure Matrix (FINJEM) was modified to improve its performance in the INTEROCC study and to address some of its limitations, resulting in the development of the INTEROCC JEM. An international team of occupational hygienists developed a crosswalk between the Finnish occupational codes used in FINJEM and the International Standard Classification of Occupations 1968 (ISCO68). For ISCO68 codes linked to multiple Finnish codes, weighted means of the exposure estimates were calculated. Similarly, multiple ISCO68 codes linked to a single Finnish code with evidence of heterogeneous exposure were refined. One of the key time periods in FINJEM (1960-1984) was split into two periods (1960-1974 and 1975-1984). Benzene exposure estimates in early periods were modified upwards. The internal consistency of hydrocarbon exposures and exposures to engine exhaust fumes was improved. Finally, exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and benzo(a)pyrene was modified to include the contribution from second-hand smoke. The crosswalk ensured that the FINJEM exposure estimates could be applied to the INTEROCC study subjects. The modifications generally resulted in an increased prevalence of exposure to chemical agents. This increased prevalence of exposure was not restricted to the lowest categories of cumulative exposure, but was seen across all levels for some agents. Although this work has produced a JEM with important improvements compared to FINJEM, further improvements are possible with the expansion of agents and additional external data.

[1]  C Brownie,et al.  The effects of exposure misclassification on estimates of relative risk. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  N. Breslow,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume II--The design and analysis of cohort studies. , 1987, IARC scientific publications.

[3]  Norman E. Breslow,et al.  The design and analysis of cohort studies , 1987 .

[4]  Norman E. Breslow,et al.  Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, Vol. II: The Design and Analysis of Cohort Studies. , 1990 .

[5]  Jack Siemiatycki,et al.  Risk Factors For Cancer In The Workplace , 1991 .

[6]  P. Lee,et al.  Risk factors for Cancer in the Work-place , 1992 .

[7]  P. Stewart,et al.  Quantification of historical exposures in occupational cohort studies. , 1996, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[8]  S. Khuder,et al.  Meta-analyses of brain cancer and farming. , 1998, American journal of industrial medicine.

[9]  T Kauppinen,et al.  From cross-tabulations to multipurpose exposure information systems: a new job-exposure matrix. , 1998, American journal of industrial medicine.

[10]  W. Ahrens,et al.  Occupational exposure to carcinogens in the European Union , 2000, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[11]  P. Simpson,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research , 2001, Journal of surgical oncology.

[12]  H Kromhout,et al.  The use of occupation and industry classifications in general population studies. , 2003, International journal of epidemiology.

[13]  H. Olsson,et al.  Occupational Exposures and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Southern Sweden , 2004, International journal of occupational and environmental health.

[14]  Paolo Boffetta,et al.  Listing Occupational Carcinogens , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[15]  D. Weisenburger,et al.  Agricultural pesticide use and risk of glioma in Nebraska, United States , 2005, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[16]  Naohito Yamaguchi,et al.  The INTERPHONE study: design, epidemiological methods, and description of the study population , 2007, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[17]  S. Hilton,et al.  Bar workers' exposure to second-hand smoke: the effect of Scottish smoke-free legislation on occupational exposure. , 2007, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[18]  P. Brochard,et al.  Brain tumours and exposure to pesticides: a case–control study in southwestern France , 2007, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[19]  J. Kaldor,et al.  Occupational exposure to ionizing and non-ionizing radiation and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma , 2007, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[20]  L. Wallace,et al.  Changes in air quality and second-hand smoke exposure in hospitality sector businesses after introduction of the English Smoke-free legislation. , 2008, Journal of public health.

[21]  T. Kauppinen,et al.  Construction of job-exposure matrices for the Nordic Occupational Cancer Study (NOCCA) , 2009, Acta oncologica.

[22]  Elisabeth Cardis,et al.  Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. , 2010, International journal of epidemiology.

[23]  J. Ayres,et al.  UK smoke-free legislation: changes in PM2.5 concentrations in bars in Scotland, England, and Wales. , 2010, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[24]  J W Cherrie,et al.  Development of a Task-Exposure Matrix (TEM) for Pesticide Use (TEMPEST). , 2010, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[25]  M. Vrijheid,et al.  Acoustic neuroma risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. , 2011, Cancer epidemiology.

[26]  E. Cardis,et al.  Evaluation of the quality and comparability of job coding across seven countries in the INTEROCC study , 2011, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[27]  Simone Morais,et al.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in gas and particulate phases of indoor environments influenced by tobacco smoke: Levels, phase distributions, and health risks , 2011 .

[28]  I. Burstyn,et al.  Aggregation of exposure level and probability into a single metric in job-exposure matrices creates bias. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[29]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Development of an exposure measurement database on five lung carcinogens (ExpoSYN) for quantitative retrospective occupational exposure assessment. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[30]  Lin Fritschi,et al.  Triaging jobs in a community-based case-control study to increase efficiency of the expert occupational assessment method. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[31]  Martie Van Tongeren,et al.  Comparison of exposure estimates in the Finnish job-exposure matrix FINJEM with a JEM derived from expert assessments performed in Montreal , 2012, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[32]  Sanni Uuksulainen,et al.  Trends of occupational exposure to chemical agents in Finland in 1950-2020. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.