Electrophysiological evidence for a shared representational medium for visual images and visual percepts.

Does mental imagery involve the activation of representations in the visual system? Systematic effects of imagery on visual signal detection performance have been used to argue that imagery and the perceptual processing of stimuli interact at some common locus of activity (Farah, 1985). However, such a result is neutral with respect to the question of whether the interaction occurs during modality-specific visual processing of the stimulus. If imagery affects stimulus processing at early, modality-specific stages of stimulus representation, this implies that the shared stimulus representations are visual, whereas if imagery affects stimulus processing only at later, amodal stages of stimulus representation, this implies that imagery involves more abstract, postvisual stimulus representations. To distinguish between these two possibilities, we repeated the earlier imagery-perception interaction experiment while recording event-related potentials (ERPs) to stimuli from 16 scalp electrodes. By observing the time course and scalp distribution of the effect of imagery on the ERP to stimuli, we can put constraints on the locus of the shared representations for imagery and perception. An effect of imagery was seen within 200 ms following stimulus presentation, at the latency of the first negative component of the visual ERP, localized at the occipital and posterior temporal regions of the scalp, that is, directly over visual cortex. This finding provides support for the claim that mental images interact with percepts in the visual system proper and hence that mental images are themselves visual representations.

[1]  W. Chase,et al.  Visual information processing. , 1974 .

[2]  M. J. Intons-Peterson,et al.  Imagery paradigms: how vulnerable are they to experimenters' expectations? , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  G. Ryle,et al.  心的概念 = The concept of mind , 1962 .

[4]  Theodore Xenophon Barber,et al.  Imagery: Current Cognitive Approaches , 1971 .

[5]  R. Näätänen Processing negativity: an evoked-potential reflection of selective attention. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  S. J. Segal,et al.  PROCESSING OF THE STIMULUS IN IMAGERY AND PERCEPTION , 1971 .

[7]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Cognition And Reality , 1976 .

[8]  S Pinker,et al.  Spontaneous imagery scanning in mental extrapolation. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Marty J. Schmidt,et al.  The quantitative measure of pattern representation in images using orientation-specific color aftereffects , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  R. Finke Levels of equivalence in imagery and perception. , 1980 .

[11]  M J Farah,et al.  Perceptual interference and facilitation with auditory imagery , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Z. Pylyshyn The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. , 1981 .

[13]  Steven P. Shwartz,et al.  Capacity limitations in human information processing , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[14]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Principal components analysis for source localization of VEPs in man , 1987, Vision Research.

[15]  M. Posner,et al.  Retention of visual and name codes of single letters. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  F. Perrin,et al.  Mapping of scalp potentials by surface spline interpolation. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[18]  M. R. Harter,et al.  Hemispheric differences in the neural processing of stimulus location and type: Effects of selective attention on visual evoked potentials , 1982, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  A. Cowey,et al.  Sensory and non-sensory visual disorders in man and monkey. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  S. J. Segal,et al.  Influence of imaged pictures and sounds on detection of visual and auditory signals. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  S M Kosslyn,et al.  Visual images preserve metric spatial information: evidence from studies of image scanning. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  J P Joseph,et al.  Modifications of the pattern-evoked potential (PEP) in relation to the stimulated part of the visual field (clues for the most probable origin of each component). , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  J Broerse,et al.  The influence of imagery ability on color aftereffects produced by physically present and imagined induction stimuli , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  M J Intons-Peterson,et al.  Experimenter naiveté and imaginal judgments. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Cheves West Perky An Experimental study of imagination. , 1910 .

[26]  Marty J. Schmidt,et al.  Orientation-Specific Color Aftereffects Following Imagination. , 1977 .

[27]  R. Finke,et al.  Theories relating mental imagery to perception. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  M. D. Rugg,et al.  Modulation of visual event-related potentials by spatial and non-spatial visual selective attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Lloyd Kaufman,et al.  Sight and mind , 1974 .

[30]  Stephen Michael Kosslyn,et al.  Information representation in visual images , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  R. Shepard,et al.  CHRONOMETRIC STUDIES OF THE ROTATION OF MENTAL IMAGES , 1973 .

[32]  J Broerse,et al.  Investigations of perception and imagery using CAEs: The role of experimental design and psychophysical method , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.