A social simulation-game to explore future co-ordination in knowledge networks at the Amsterdam Police Force

The 32 autonomous neighbourhood teams of the Amsterdam Police Force need to utilise each other's knowledge and expertise to deal with the variety and complexity of their daily work assignments. However, despite the creation of organisation wide knowledge networks, communication, co-ordination and knowledge sharing between the neighbourhood teams is disappointing. We conducted an action research to investigate how co-ordination in the knowledge networks could be improved with the help of information and communication technologies (ICTs). This article reflects on the choice of co-ordination perspectives and modelling techniques. The above problem is conceptualised and made operational in different ways in research on network co-ordination, knowledge co-ordination and co-ordination of distributed work. The article demonstrates how our initial focus on capturing quantitative measures of the co-ordination problem in a computer simulation was problematic in this case. Instead a social simulation-game that focused on the qualitative issues of this co-ordination problem was developed and played. We conclude that the choice of theoretical perspectives and modelling techniques strongly affected the results of both phases of our action research. Furthermore the article argues that more attention to qualitative issues in co-ordination is required to better understand the impact of ICT-support on co-ordination.

[1]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The interdisciplinary study of coordination , 1994, CSUR.

[2]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[3]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other? , 2001, MIS Q..

[4]  Gert-Jan de Vreede,et al.  Designing simulation-games for organizational prototyping , 2006 .

[5]  Jacques H. Trienekens,et al.  Views on inter-enterprise relationships , 2001 .

[6]  Inger V. Eriksson,et al.  Aligning organizations and their information technology infrastructure: How to make information technology support business , 2003 .

[7]  Bruno Vallespir,et al.  Positioning a company in enterprise collaborations: Vertical integration and make-or-buy decisions , 2001 .

[8]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[9]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Learning from Notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation , 1992, CSCW '92.

[10]  Joeri van Laere,et al.  Designing Intra-Organisational Distributed Coordination at the Amsterdam Police Force: The Application of Gaming as a Tool to Facilitate Technology-Use Mediation , 2000 .

[11]  M. Den Hengst Bruggeling,et al.  Interorganizational coordination in container transport. A chain management design. , 1999 .

[12]  C. Cramton.  The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[13]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Competing with flexible lateral organizations , 1993 .

[14]  Cathy S. Greenblat,et al.  Designing Games and Simulations: An Illustrated Handbook , 1987 .

[15]  Cathy Greenblat.  Designing games and simulations , 1987 .

[16]  Henk G. Sol,et al.  Business Engineering: Dynanic Modeling Instruments for a Dynamic World , 1996 .

[17]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[18]  Sue Newell,et al.  Limits of IT-driven knowledge management initiatives for interactive innovation processes: towards a community-based approach , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[19]  Sue Newell,et al.  Knowledge management-when will people management enter the debate? , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[20]  Klaus-Dieter Thoben,et al.  Typological issues in enterprise networks , 2001 .

[21]  Gary Dickson,et al.  Using GSS to Design Organizational Processes and Information Systems: An Action Research Study on Collaborative Business Engineering , 2000 .

[22]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies , 2002 .

[23]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Vicious and Virtuous Circles in the Management of Knowledge: The Case of Infosys Technologies , 2005, MIS Q..

[24]  K. Thoben,et al.  Anatomy of enterprise collaborations , 2001 .

[25]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[26]  W. Bockstael-Blok.  Chains and Networks in Multimodal Passenger Transport: Exploring a design approach , 2001 .

[27]  Arthur D. Shulman,et al.  Putting Group Information Technology in its Place: Communication and Good Work Group Performance , 1999 .

[28]  Henk Sol,et al.  Simulation in information systems development. , 1982 .

[29]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  Organisational Prototyping: Adopting CSCW Applications in Organisations , 1996, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Sebastiaan Meijer,et al.  A chain game for distributed trading and negotiation , 2003 .

[31]  J. van Laere,et al.  Coordinating distributed work: Exploring situated coordination with gaming-simulation , 2003 .

[32]  Peter J. van Baalen,et al.  The Implications of Different Models of Social Relations for Understanding Knowledge Sharing , 2004 .

[33]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[34]  W Blok.  CHAINS AND NETWORKS IN MULTIMODAL PASSENGER TRANSPORT. EXPLORING A DESIGN APPROACH , 2002 .

[35]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[36]  Mariëlle den Hengst,et al.  Collaborative Business Engineering: A Decade of Lessons from the Field , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Riitta Smeds,et al.  Simulation for accelerated learning and development in industrial management , 2003 .

[38]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .