Geology of the northern part of the Nanga Parbat massif, northern Pakistan, and its implications for Himalayan tectonics

The northern outcrop termination of Indian continental crust lies at the Nanga Parbat massif, from where this contribution presents new field data. The tectonic contact with the structurally overlying Kohistan island arc is concordant and ductile, is associated with interleaving of Nanga Parbat and Kohistan lithologies, and may be correlated with the Main Mantle thrust found elsewhere in the NW Himalayas. This ductile shear zone is locally overprinted by cataclastic faults associated with exhumation of the massif but overall, the northern outcrop termination of the massif is controlled by erosion through a gently, northward-plunging antiformal structure. This folds both the Main Mantle thrust and the underlying, concordant 'Layered Unit' of the Nanga Parbat basement. Thus there is no indication that the massif acted as a promontory to the Indian continent during collision nor that it is a structure entirely bound by neotectonic faults. Ductile shear fabrics associated with the 'Main Mantle thrust' are cross-cut by leucogranite sheets and pegmatites. These may represent the stockwork to a significant crustal-melt granite body described here in the northern massif. This Jutial granite shows many geochemical characteristics in common with similar bodies in the High Himalayas which are consistent with anatexis of the buried Indian continental basement rocks. However, the granite is enriched in heat producing elements (particularly Th: 22 ppm) and shows extremely high 87Sr/86Sr ratios (>0.88). The high concentrations of radiogenic Sr are also an attribute of a suite of hitherto enigmatic leucogranitic pegmatites that laces the Nanga Parbat massif, suggesting that these may represent a stockwork to a largely buried body of which the Jutial granite is a small exposure. The enrichment in heat-producing elements within the granite may reflect similarly high heat production in the source Indian continental crust requiring in turn a fundamental re-examination of the thermal evolution of this crust during Himalayan metamorphism and exhumation.

[1]  D. Prior,et al.  Folding and imbrication of the Indian crust during Himalayan collision , 1988, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[2]  G. Potts,et al.  Structural evolution and asymmetric uplift of the Nanga Parbat syntaxis, Pakistan Himalya , 1991 .

[3]  B. N. Upreti,et al.  Crustal generation of the Himalayan leucogranites , 1987 .

[4]  D. Prior,et al.  Anatomy of a continental subduction zone: The main mantle thrust in Northern Pakistan , 1988 .

[5]  M. B. Crawford,et al.  Leucogranites of the Himalaya/Karakoram: implications for magmatic evolution within collisional belts and the study of collision-related leucogranite petrogenesis , 1990 .

[6]  J. Dewey,et al.  Shortening of continental lithosphere: the neotectonics of Eastern Anatolia — a young collision zone , 1986, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[7]  A. Gansser.  The significance of the Himalayan suture zone , 1980 .

[8]  P. Misch.  Metasomatic granitization of batholithic dimensions , 1949 .

[9]  T. M. Harrison,et al.  Zircon saturation revisited: temperature and composition effects in a variety of crustal magma types , 1983 .

[10]  P. Zeitler,et al.  A petrologic record of the collision between the Kohistan Island-Arc and Indian Plate, northwest Himalaya , 1989 .

[11]  A. Tindle,et al.  Geochemical characteristics of collision-zone magmatism , 1986, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[12]  C. Pudsey,et al.  Collision tectonics in the NW Himalayas , 1986, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[13]  B. Scaillet,et al.  Badrinath-Gangotri plutons (Garhwal, India): petrological and geochemical evidence for fractionation processes in a high Himalayan leucogranite , 1990 .

[14]  C. Deniel,et al.  Isotopic study of the Manaslu granite (Himalaya, Nepal): inferences on the age and source of Himalayan leucogranites , 1987 .

[15]  C. France‐Lanord,et al.  Crustal melting and granite genesis during the Himalayan collision orogenesis , 1988, Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.

[16]  R. Lacassin,et al.  Kilometre-scale sheath fold at Mattmark and implications for transport direction in the Alps , 1985, Nature.

[17]  B. Windley,et al.  RbSr dating of the Kohistan arc-batholith in the Trans-Himalaya of north Pakistan, and tectonic implications , 1985 .

[18]  P. Zeitler.  Cooling history of the NW Himalaya, Pakistan , 1985 .

[19]  P. Zeitler,et al.  Petrogenetic and tectonic significance of young leucogranites from the northwestern Himalaya, Pakistan , 1991 .

[20]  D. Prior,et al.  Neotectonics of the Nanga Parbat Syntaxis, Pakistan, and crustal stacking in the northwest Himalayas , 1989 .

[21]  M. Brunel.  Ductile thrusting in the Himalayas : shear sense criteria and stretching lineations , 1986 .

[22]  J. Achache,et al.  India–Eurasia collision chronology has implications for crustal shortening and driving mechanism of plates , 1984, Nature.

[23]  J. Sutter,et al.  Geochronology and temperature history of the Nanga Parbat–Haramosh Massif, Pakistan , 1989 .

[24]  C. Pudsey.  The Northern Suture, Pakistan: margin of a Cretaceous island arc , 1986, Geological Magazine.

[25]  A. Tindle,et al.  Trace Element Discrimination Diagrams for the Tectonic Interpretation of Granitic Rocks , 1984 .

[26]  R. D. Lawrence,et al.  The northwestern Nanga Parbat–Haramosh Massif; Evidence for crustal uplift at the northwestern corner of the Indian Craton , 1989 .