Electronic resource discovery systems: from user behaviour to design

Information seeking is a central part of academic development for both students and researchers. However, this is often hindered by complex and highly complicated electronic resource discovery systems. One approach to improving these resources is to understand the difficulties and likely causes of problems when using current systems and how people develop their searching, retrieval and storage strategies. These might provide useful information about the requirements for future design. In this paper we present our findings from UBiRD, a project investigating user search behaviour in electronic resource discovery systems based on a qualitative study of 34 users from three UK universities. We then describe how the information gathered during the study helped inform the design of INVISQUE, a novel non-conventional interface for searching and querying on-line scholarly information. In addition, the theories and design principles used during the INVISQUE design are discussed.

[1]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Analysing ambulance dispatcher decision making: trialing emergent themes analysis , 2002 .

[2]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Visual information seeking: tight coupling of dynamic query filters with starfield displays , 1994, CHI '94.

[3]  Peter Pirolli,et al.  Information Foraging , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[4]  Peter Pirolli,et al.  Information foraging theory , 2007 .

[5]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[6]  B. Shneiderman,et al.  The dynamic HomeFinder: evaluating dynamic queries in a real-estate information exploration system , 1992, SIGIR '92.

[7]  James J. Thomas Visual Analytics: Why Now? , 2007, Inf. Vis..

[8]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The alphaslider: a compact and rapid selector , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[9]  Judy Payne Researching Health Needs: A Community-Based Approach , 1999 .

[10]  Roberta Calderwood,et al.  Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[11]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Once Found, What Then? , 2002 .

[12]  Jock D. Mackinlay,et al.  Information visualization using 3D interactive animation , 1993, CACM.

[13]  P. Pirolli Information Foraging Theory: Adaptive Interaction with Information , 2007 .

[14]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction , 2002, UBIQ.

[15]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[16]  Timothy Cribbin,et al.  Footprints of information foragers: behaviour semantics of visual exploration , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  Nigel Shadbolt,et al.  Use of the Critical Decision Method to Elicit Expert Knowledge: A Case Study in the Methodology of Cognitive Task Analysis , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[18]  John Stasko,et al.  Jigsaw: supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization , 2008 .

[19]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .

[20]  Jock D. Mackinlay,et al.  Information visualization using 3D interactive animation : Graphical user interfaces : the next generation , 1993 .

[21]  Judy Payne Researching Health Needs , 1999 .

[22]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  LifeLines: visualizing personal histories , 1996, CHI.

[23]  Y. Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design , 2002 .

[24]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Information Visualisation and Virtual Environments , 1999 .

[25]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The alphaslider: a compact and rapid selector , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.