Development of a novel ArcCHECK™ insert for routine quality assurance of VMAT delivery including dose calculation with inhomogeneities.

PURPOSE To design a versatile, nonhomogeneous insert for the dose verification phantom ArcCHECK™ (Sun Nuclear Corp., FL) and to demonstrate its usefulness for the verification of dose distributions in inhomogeneous media. As an example, we demonstrate it can be used clinically for routine quality assurance of two volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) systems for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): SmartArc® (Pinnacle3 , Philips Radiation Oncology Systems, Fitchburg, WI) and RapidArc® (Eclipse™ , Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). METHODS The cylindrical detector array ArcCHECK™ has a retractable homogeneous acrylic insert. In this work, we designed and manufactured a customized heterogeneous insert with densities that simulate soft tissue, lung, bone, and air. The insert offers several possible heterogeneity configurations and multiple locations for point dose measurements. SmartArc® and RapidArc® plans for lung SBRT were generated and copied to ArcCHECK™ for each inhomogeneity configuration. Dose delivery was done on a Varian 2100 ix linac. The evaluation of dose distributions was based on gamma analysis of the diode measurements and point doses measurements at different positions near the inhomogeneities. RESULTS The insert was successfully manufactured and tested with different measurements of VMAT plans. Dose distributions measured with the homogeneous insert showed gamma passing rates similar to our clinical results (∼99%) for both treatment-planning systems. Using nonhomogeneous inserts decreased the passing rates by up to 3.6% in the examples studied. Overall, SmartArc® plans showed better gamma passing rates for nonhomogeneous measurements. The discrepancy between calculated and measured point doses was increased up to 6.5% for the nonhomogeneous insert depending on the inhomogeneity configuration and measurement location. SmartArc® and RapidArc® plans had similar plan quality but RapidArc® plans had significantly higher monitor units (up to 70%). CONCLUSIONS A versatile, nonhomogeneous insert was developed for ArcCHECK™ for an easy and quick evaluation of dose calculations with nonhomogeneous media and for comparison of different treatment planning systems. The device was tested for SmartArc® and RapidArc® plans for lung SBRT, showing the uncertainties of dose calculations with inhomogeneities. The new insert combines the convenience of the ArcCHECK™ and the possibility of assessing dose distributions in inhomogeneous media.

[1]  Joachim Widder,et al.  Recommendations for implementing stereotactic radiotherapy in peripheral stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: report from the Quality Assurance Working Party of the randomised phase III ROSEL study , 2009, Radiation oncology.

[2]  Luca Cozzi,et al.  Comparison of dose calculation algorithms for treatment planning in external photon beam therapy for clinical situations , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  L. Cozzi,et al.  Accuracy of Acuros XB and AAA dose calculation for small fields with reference to RapidArc(®) stereotactic treatments. , 2011, Medical physics.

[4]  D. Low,et al.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. , 1998, Medical physics.

[5]  Geoffrey G. Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of a new VMAT QA device, or the “X” and “O” array geometries , 2011, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[6]  Malcolm R McEwen,et al.  Measurement of ionization chamber absorbed dose k(Q) factors in megavoltage photon beams. , 2010, Medical physics.

[7]  Stine Korreman,et al.  RapidArc volumetric modulated therapy planning for prostate cancer patients , 2009, Acta oncologica.

[8]  Bo Lu,et al.  Calibration of a novel four-dimensional diode array. , 2009, Medical physics.

[9]  Karl Otto,et al.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. , 2007, Medical physics.

[10]  S. Senan,et al.  Rapid delivery of stereotactic radiotherapy for peripheral lung tumors using volumetric intensity-modulated arcs. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  David A Jaffray,et al.  Novel dosimetric phantom for quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy. , 2009, Medical physics.

[12]  Luca Cozzi,et al.  On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  J. Dempsey,et al.  Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method. , 2003, Medical physics.

[14]  Luca Cozzi,et al.  Dosimetric evaluation of Acuros XB Advanced Dose Calculation algorithm in heterogeneous media , 2011, Radiation oncology.

[15]  L de Carlan,et al.  Assessment of small volume ionization chambers as reference dosimeters in high-energy photon beams. , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Firas Mourtada,et al.  Dosimetric comparison of Acuros XB deterministic radiation transport method with Monte Carlo and model-based convolution methods in heterogeneous media. , 2011, Medical physics.

[17]  A L Petoukhova,et al.  The ArcCHECK diode array for dosimetric verification of HybridArc. , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  L. Cozzi,et al.  On the dosimetric impact of inhomogeneity management in the Acuros XB algorithm for breast treatment , 2011, Radiation oncology.

[19]  J. Cygler,et al.  Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  M Engelsman,et al.  Impact of simple tissue inhomogeneity correction algorithms on conformal radiotherapy of lung tumours. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  Suresh Senan,et al.  Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  D. Yan,et al.  Clinical applications of volumetric modulated arc therapy. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  M. Kaus,et al.  Development and evaluation of an efficient approach to volumetric arc therapy planning. , 2009, Medical physics.

[24]  P. Carrasco,et al.  Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium. , 2004, Medical physics.