The Way the Ball Bounces: Visual and Auditory Perception of Elasticity and Control of the Bounce Pass

Human observers may perceive not only spatial and temporal dimensions of the environment, but also dynamic physical properties that are useful for the control of behavior. A study is presented in which visual and auditory perception of elasticity in bouncing objects, which was specified by kinematic (spatiotemporal) patterns of object motion, were examined. In experiment 1, observers could perceive the elasticity of a bouncing ball and were able to regulate the impulse applied to the ball in a bounce pass. In experiments 2 and 3, it was demonstrated that visual perception of elasticity was based on relative height information, when it was available, and on the duration of a single period under other conditions. Observers did not make effective use of velocity information. In experiment 4, visual and auditory period information were compared and equivalent performance in both modalities was found. The results are interpreted as support for the view that dynamic properties of environmental events are perceived by means of kinematic information.

[1]  Perception of Invariants by Five-Month-Old Infants: Differentiation of Two Types of Motion. , 1978 .

[2]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[3]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Intuitive physics: the straight-down belief and its origin. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  B. Shanon.  Aristotelianism, Newtonianism and the Physics of the Layman , 1976, Perception.

[5]  W. H. Warren,et al.  Visual control of step length during running over irregular terrain. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  M. McCloskey.  Naive Theories of Motion. , 1982 .

[7]  Michael McCloskey,et al.  Intuitive physics: the straight-down belief and its origin. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: naive beliefs about the motion of objects. , 1980, Science.

[9]  S. Runeson,et al.  Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expe , 1983 .

[10]  W. Warren.  Action modes and laws of control for the visual guidance of action , 1988 .

[11]  S. Runeson,et al.  Visual perception of lifted weight. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  S. Runeson,et al.  Constant velocity — Not perceived as such , 1974, Psychological research.

[13]  J. Gibson,et al.  The sensitivity of the eye to two kinds of continuous transformation of a shadow-pattern. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  S. Runeson.  On visual perception of dynamic events , 1983 .

[15]  J. N. Bassili.  Temporal and spatial contingencies in the perception of social events , 1976 .

[16]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Judgments of natural and anomalous trajectories in the presence and absence of motion. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  W H Warren,et al.  Auditory perception of breaking and bouncing events: a case study in ecological acoustics. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual Perception of Relative Mass in Dynamic Events , 1982, Perception.

[19]  K. Green.  The perception of speaking rate using visual information from a talker’s face , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Geoffrey P. Bingham.  Kinematic Form and Scaling: Further Investigations on the Visual Perception of Lifted Weight , 1987 .

[21]  I P Howard,et al.  Recognition and Knowledge of the Water-Level Principle , 1978, Perception.

[22]  S. Runeson.  On the possibility of "smart" perceptual mechanisms. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[23]  M K Kaiser,et al.  The development of sensitivity to causally relevant dynamic information. , 1984, Child development.

[24]  G. Bingham.  Kinematic form and scaling: further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[26]  L. Marks.  The Unity of the Senses , 1978 .

[27]  E. Spelke.  Perceiving Bimodally Specified Events in Infancy , 1979 .

[28]  Michael McCloskey,et al.  Naive physics: the curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects , 1983 .

[29]  J. Todd.  Visual information about rigid and nonrigid motion: a geometric analysis. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  E. Gibson,et al.  Development of the Perception of Invariants: Substance and Shape , 1979, Perception.

[31]  Drew H. Abney,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Influence of Musical Groove on Postural Sway , 2015 .

[32]  E. Spelke.  Infants' intermodal perception of events , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Naive physics: the curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  J. Pittenger,et al.  Estimation of Pendulum Length from Information in Motion , 1985, Perception.