Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction with quantitative gated SPECT: Accuracy and correlation with first-pass radionuclide angiography

BackgroundQuantitative gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT [QGS]) software is widely used for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Potentially confounding variables that may affect the accuracy of quantitative analysis of LVEF remain undefined. This study evaluated the accuracy of QGS as a means of determining LVEF in a wide range of LVEF values; evaluated the effect of extracardiac activity, count statistics, heart size, and perfusion defects on the accuracy of QGS LVEF; and compared QGS LVEF obtained at rest with that obtained after stress.Methods and ResultsQGS-derived LVEF was compared with rest first-pass radionuclide angiography (FPRNA) LVEF in 400 electrocardiographic-gated SPECT studies. The overall correlation between QGS and FPRNA LVEF was only fair (r = 0.66, SEE = 11.85%). In 35 of the patient studies (9%) with high extracardiac activity, the automated software failed, and no correlation was obtained. In the remaining 365 patient studies (91%), left ventricular contours were successfully identified. In these studies, correlation was better (r = 0.74, SEE = 9.77%). Agreement was better for images with high counts (r = 0.81, SEE = 8.66%) than for images with low counts (r = 0.61, SEE = 11.17%). Patient studies with abnormal LVEF had better correlation (r = 0.77, SEE = 6.4%) than studies with normal LVEF (r = 0.46, SEE = 10.2%). Agreement between QGS LVEF and FPRNA LVEF was better in hearts with large end diastolic volumes (> 104 mL) than in hearts with small volumes. Overall, mean QGS LVEF was lower than mean FPRNA LVEF (54% ± 14% vs 58% ± 14%, P <.0001). There was no difference between mean rest and stress QGS LVEF in the same patients, even in patients with stress-induced ischemia.ConclusionsQGS is a valuable method for assessing resting LVEF. However, QGS LVEF is often lower than FPRNA LVEF. Accuracy is affected by high extracardiac activity, low count density, and small size of the left ventricle. (J Nucl Cardiol 2000;7:461–70.)

[1]  R T Constable,et al.  Reproducibility and accuracy of gated SPECT for determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: experimental validation using MRI. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  D. Berman,et al.  Incremental prognostic value of post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction and volume by gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. , 1999, Circulation.

[3]  M. Verani,et al.  Accuracy of left ventricular ejection fraction determined by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT with Tl-201 and Tc-99m sestamibi: Comparison with first-pass radionuclide angiography , 1999, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[4]  E. Depuey,et al.  Influence of arrhythmias on gated SPECT myocardial perfusion and function quantification. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  M Unser,et al.  Segmentation of gated TI-SPECT images and computation of ejection fraction: A different approach , 1999, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[6]  A. Cribier,et al.  201Tl and 99mTc-MIBI gated SPECT in patients with large perfusion defects and left ventricular dysfunction: comparison with equilibrium radionuclide angiography. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  A J Sinusas,et al.  Quantification of SPECT myocardial perfusion images: Methodology and validation of the Yale-CQ method , 1999, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[8]  S. Port.  Imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures , 1999 .

[9]  D. Berman,et al.  Validation of left ventricular volume measurements by gated SPECT 99mTc-labeled sestamibi imaging , 1998, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[10]  D. Berman,et al.  Repeatability of automatic left ventricular cavity volume measurements from myocardial perfusion SPECT , 1998, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[11]  Michael A. King,et al.  An investigation of the estimation of ejection fractions and cardiac volumes by a quantitative gated SPECT software package in simulated gated SPECT images , 1998, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[12]  G. Germano,et al.  Postischemic stunning can affect left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion on post-stress gated sestamibi tomograms. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  D D Watson,et al.  Validation of a new counts-based gated single photon emission computed tomography method for quantifying left ventricular systolic function: Comparison with equilibrium radionuclide angiography , 1997, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[14]  W. Smith,et al.  Quantitative gated single photon emission computed tomography imaging: A counts-based method for display and measurement of regional and global ventricular systolic function , 1997, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[15]  Matt A. King,et al.  Evaluation of right and left ventricular volume and ejection fraction using a mathematical cardiac torso phantom. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  D. Berman,et al.  Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  M S Rosenthal,et al.  Quantitative SPECT imaging: a review and recommendations by the Focus Committee of the Society of Nuclear Medicine Computer and Instrumentation Council. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  G Germano,et al.  Gated technetium-99m sestamibi for simultaneous assessment of stress myocardial perfusion, postexercise regional ventricular function and myocardial viability. Correlation with echocardiography and rest thallium-201 scintigraphy. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  E G DePuey,et al.  Left ventricular ejection fraction assessed from gated technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  E. J. Brown,et al.  Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial. The SAVE Investigators. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  T. Faber,et al.  Three-dimensional motion and perfusion quantification in gated single-photon emission computed tomograms. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  E. Sowton,et al.  The evaluation of ventricular function using gated myocardial imaging with Tc-99m MIBI. , 1989, European heart journal.

[23]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Risk stratification and survival after myocardial infarction. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  R J Callahan,et al.  A modified method for the in vivo labeling of red blood cells with Tc-99m: concise communication. , 1982, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  A. Elliott,et al.  Factors That Affect the Reproducibility of Measurements of Left Ventricular Function from First‐pass Radionuclide Ventriculograms , 1982, Circulation.

[26]  B. Pitt,et al.  Predictors of Clinical Course, Coronary Anatomy and Left Ventricular Function After Recovery From Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1980, Circulation.

[27]  L Goldman,et al.  Multiple gated cardiac blood pool imaging for left ventricular ejection fraction: validation of the technique and assessment of variability. , 1979, The American journal of cardiology.

[28]  K. Hammermeister,et al.  Variables predictive of survival in patients with coronary disease. Selection by univariate and multivariate analyses from the clinical, electrocardiographic, exercise, arteriographic, and quantitative angiographic evaluations. , 1979, Circulation.

[29]  T. K. Natarajan,et al.  A scintiphotographic method for measuring left ventricular ejection fraction in man without cardiac catheterization. , 1971, The American journal of cardiology.

[30]  J. W. Kennedy,et al.  Left ventricular volume and mass from single-plane cineangiocardiogram. A comparison of anteroposterior and right anterior oblique methods. , 1970, American heart journal.

[31]  M. Verani,et al.  Evaluation of left ventricular wall motion, volumes, and ejection fraction by gated myocardial tomography with technetium 99m-labeled tetrofosmin: A comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[32]  G. Germano,et al.  Gated SPECT reconstruction with zoom and depth dependent filter improves accuracy of volume and LVEF in small hearts , 1999 .

[33]  James A. Case,et al.  Overestimation of LVEF by gated MIBI myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with small hearts , 1998 .

[34]  K. Williams,et al.  Left ventricular function in patients with coronary artery disease assessed by gated tomographic myocardial perfusion images. Comparison with assessment by contrast ventriculography and first-pass radionuclide angiography. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  F. Wackers.  The maze of myocardial perfusion imaging protocols in 1994 , 1994, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.