Study on Sensitivity Differences of Critical Spontaneous Ignition Temperature between Alcohol and Hydrocarbon Fuels Based on Reaction Pathway

In this article, the critical spontaneous ignition temperature of both hydrocarbon and alcohol fuel was acquired on a constant volume combustion bomb platform by slowly heating the inner charges, and then followed by using the CHEMKIN-PRO software to simulate the auto-ignition-dominated characteristic and parameter sensitivity of the two kinds of fuels. Results revealed that in different conditions, the critical spontaneous ignition temperature of methanol changed dramatically, with a maximum temperature of 50 K, while the counterpart temperature of n-heptane remained an invariable value of 553 K within a large changeable scope of temperature, and only a maximum temperature of 10 K was observed. The maximum difference of spontaneous ignition temperature between methanol and n-heptane reached 270 K. At the same time, a minimum difference of 170 K was obtained as well. The complete reaction of methanol requires 5 steps, involving 6 components and 11 elementary reactions. However, for the comparative part-n-heptane, more than 20 main self-ignition reactions were involved, which indicated that the whole reaction process of n-heptane has more reaction pathway branches and it was much more complicated compared to methanol. The differences of the reaction pathways triggered a considerable distinction of critical self-ignition temperature between the two charges, making a “step-by-step” spontaneous ignition combustion mode possible. In this way, a further high-efficient and clean combustion can be available to cater to much more stringent emission regulations in the future.

[1]  Ingemar Denbratt,et al.  HCCI Combustion Using Charge Stratification for Combustion Control , 2007 .

[2]  Hatim Machrafi,et al.  An experimental and numerical analysis of the influence of the inlet temperature, equivalence ratio and compression ratio on the HCCI auto-ignition process of Primary Reference Fuels in an engine , 2008 .

[3]  U. Maas,et al.  Investigations on Pre-Ignition in Highly Supercharged SI Engines , 2010 .

[4]  Timothy J. Callahan,et al.  Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition of Diesel Fuel , 1996 .

[5]  Zhen Huang,et al.  Experimental study and chemical analysis of n-heptane homogeneous charge compression ignition combustion with port injection of reaction inhibitors , 2007 .

[6]  Philip John Bowen,et al.  Laminar-burning velocities of hydrogen-air and hydrogen-methane-air mixtures : An experimental study , 2006 .

[7]  Shucheng Xu,et al.  Theoretical study on the kinetics for OH reactions with CH3OH and C2H5OH , 2007 .

[8]  Zhen Huang,et al.  Experimental study of n-heptane ignition delay with carbon dioxide addition in a rapid compression machine under low-temperature conditions , 2012 .

[9]  Thomas D. Durbin,et al.  Characterization of PM-PEMS for in-use measurements conducted during validation testing for the PM-PEMS measurement allowance program , 2010 .

[10]  John M. Simmie,et al.  Autoignition of heptanes; experiments and modeling , 2005 .

[11]  S. H. Jo,et al.  Active Thermo-Atmosphere Combustion (ATAC) - A New Combustion Process for Internal Combustion Engines , 1979 .

[12]  Yongqiang Han,et al.  Experimental and Kinetic Modeling Study of Autoignition Characteristics of n-Heptane/Ethanol by Constant Volume Bomb and Detail Reaction Mechanism , 2017 .

[13]  Morteza Fathi,et al.  EGR and Intake Charge Temperature Effects on Dual-Fuel HCCI Combustion and Emissions Characteristics , 2011 .

[14]  Darius Mehta,et al.  The Effect of EGR on Low-Speed Pre-Ignition in Boosted SI Engines , 2011 .

[15]  Ultan Burke,et al.  A detailed chemical kinetic modeling, ignition delay time and jet-stirred reactor study of methanol oxidation , 2016 .

[16]  J. Bergthorson,et al.  Comparative High Temperature Shock Tube Ignition of C1−C4 Primary Alcohols , 2010 .

[17]  Experimental and Numerical Investigation into the Effect of Fuel Type and Fuel/Air Molar Concentration on Autoignition Temperature of n-Heptane, Methanol, Ethanol, and Butanol , 2017 .

[18]  Jun Wang,et al.  Experimental Investigation of the Loading Strategy of an Automotive Diesel Engine under Transient Operation Conditions , 2018 .

[19]  G. Adomeit,et al.  Self-ignition of S.I. engine model fuels: A shock tube investigation at high pressure ☆ , 1997 .

[20]  T. Korakianitis,et al.  Natural-gas fueled spark-ignition (SI) and compression-ignition (CI) engine performance and emissions , 2011 .

[21]  Richard A. Thomas,et al.  Flammability of methane, propane, and hydrogen gases , 2000 .

[22]  Wang Xianfeng,et al.  Feasibility analysis and performance characteristics investigation of spatial recuperative expander based on organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery , 2016 .