PlasmaKinetic bipolar vessel sealing: burst pressures and thermal spread in an animal model.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Laparoscopic bipolar instruments are commonly employed to cauterize and divide tissue. A next-generation bipolar device has been developed that employs vapor pulse coagulation energy. We assessed the vessel-sealing capability of this device and quantified thermal spread during application. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bilateral laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed on six common swine >25 kg. Five-millimeter clips and surgical staplers (US Surgical, Norwalk, CT) were utilized to perform nephrectomy on one side, while the Gyrus PlasmaKinetic bipolar device (Minneapolis, MN) was employed for the contralateral nephrectomy. Vessel-sealing capabilities were assessed via burst-pressure studies. The extent of thermal spread was measured after tissue fixation and hematoxylin and eosin staining. RESULTS Surgical clips/vascular staplers adequately controlled/sealed renal hilar vessels with burst pressures nearing 300 mm Hg. The Gyrus bipolar device reliably sealed and divided renal arteries <or=5 mm with burst pressures averaging 291 mm Hg. Renal arteries above this size were not consistently sealed, but, with the exception of one technical error, renal veins of all sizes (3-12 mm) were reliably controlled (average burst pressure 288 mm Hg). Histologic evidence of thermal spread extended an average of 3.6 mm from the cut edges of arteries and 3.4 mm from the edges of veins. CONCLUSIONS The Gyrus PlasmaKinetic bipolar device is capable of reliably sealing/ dividing arteries as large as 6 mm, although we recommend restricting its use to vessels no larger than 5 mm in diameter to allow a safety margin. In addition, porcine renal veins of all sizes are adequately controlled. These sealed vessels are able to withstand pressures approaching 300 mm Hg. Thermal spread affects only the area surrounding the divided vessel. Further clinical studies are warranted.

[1]  H. Reich Laparoscopic bowel injury. , 1992, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[2]  J. Wolf,et al.  Use of bipolar electrocautery during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[3]  J R Monson,et al.  Cause and prevention of electrosurgical injuries in laparoscopy. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[4]  R. Tucker Laparoscopic electrosurgical injuries: survey results and their implications. , 1995, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[5]  N. Soper,et al.  Prospective, randomized trial of bipolar electrosurgery vs ultrasonic coagulation for division of short gastric vessels during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[6]  G. Mostafa,et al.  Effectiveness of the Ultrasonic Coagulating Shears, LigaSure Vessel Sealer, and Surgical Clip Application in Biliary Surgery: A Comparative Analysis , 2001, The American surgeon.

[7]  J. Hunter,et al.  The use of bipolar cautery, laparosonic coagulating shears, and vascular clips for hemostasis of small and medium-sized vessels , 1998, Surgical Endoscopy.

[8]  M. EL-mETEINI,et al.  Management of laparoscopic-related bowel injuries , 2000, Surgical Endoscopy.

[9]  L S Schultz,et al.  Using 5-mm bipolar cutting forceps: a new multifunctional instrument. , 1997, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[10]  Abe Fingerhut,et al.  Harmonic scalpel™ in laparoscopic colorectal surgery , 2001, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[11]  J. Champion,et al.  New application of bipolar coagulation in laparoscopic surgery. , 1996, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[12]  G. Preminger,et al.  Use of bipolar laparoscopic forceps to occlude and transect the retroperitoneal vasculature: a porcine model. , 2003, Journal of endourology.

[13]  T. Higami,et al.  Histologic and physiologic evaluation of skeletonized internal thoracic artery harvesting with an ultrasonic scalpel. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.