Evaluation of Internet-Based Dengue Query Data: Google Dengue Trends

Dengue is a common and growing problem worldwide, with an estimated 70–140 million cases per year. Traditional, healthcare-based, government-implemented dengue surveillance is resource intensive and slow. As global Internet use has increased, novel, Internet-based disease monitoring tools have emerged. Google Dengue Trends (GDT) uses near real-time search query data to create an index of dengue incidence that is a linear proxy for traditional surveillance. Studies have shown that GDT correlates highly with dengue incidence in multiple countries on a large spatial scale. This study addresses the heterogeneity of GDT at smaller spatial scales, assessing its accuracy at the state-level in Mexico and identifying factors that are associated with its accuracy. We used Pearson correlation to estimate the association between GDT and traditional dengue surveillance data for Mexico at the national level and for 17 Mexican states. Nationally, GDT captured approximately 83% of the variability in reported cases over the 9 study years. The correlation between GDT and reported cases varied from state to state, capturing anywhere from 1% of the variability in Baja California to 88% in Chiapas, with higher accuracy in states with higher dengue average annual incidence. A model including annual average maximum temperature, precipitation, and their interaction accounted for 81% of the variability in GDT accuracy between states. This climate model was the best indicator of GDT accuracy, suggesting that GDT works best in areas with intense transmission, particularly where local climate is well suited for transmission. Internet accessibility (average ∼36%) did not appear to affect GDT accuracy. While GDT seems to be a less robust indicator of local transmission in areas of low incidence and unfavorable climate, it may indicate cases among travelers in those areas. Identifying the strengths and limitations of novel surveillance is critical for these types of data to be used to make public health decisions and forecasting models.

[1]  D. Cummings,et al.  Prediction of Dengue Incidence Using Search Query Surveillance , 2011, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[2]  Gerardo Chowell,et al.  Climate-based descriptive models of dengue fever: the 2002 epidemic in Colima, Mexico. , 2006, Journal of environmental health.

[3]  Emily H. Chan,et al.  Using Web Search Query Data to Monitor Dengue Epidemics: A New Model for Neglected Tropical Disease Surveillance , 2011, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[4]  H M Yang,et al.  Assessing the effects of temperature on the population of Aedes aegypti, the vector of dengue , 2009, Epidemiology and Infection.

[5]  Michael Marx,et al.  What does dengue disease surveillance contribute to predicting and detecting outbreaks and describing trends? , 2008, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[6]  Michael A. Johansson,et al.  The Incubation Periods of Dengue Viruses , 2012, PloS one.

[7]  S. Hales,et al.  Potential effect of population and climate changes on global distribution of dengue fever: an empirical model , 2002, The Lancet.

[8]  B. A. Harrison,et al.  Effect of temperature on the vector efficiency of Aedes aegypti for dengue 2 virus. , 1987, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[9]  S. Halstead,et al.  Dengue virus-mosquito interactions. , 2008, Annual review of entomology.

[10]  H. Margolis,et al.  Health Economics of Dengue: A Systematic Literature Review and Expert Panel's Assessment , 2011, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[11]  Emily H. Chan,et al.  Global capacity for emerging infectious disease detection , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  S. Thammapalo,et al.  Environmental factors and incidence of dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever in an urban area, Southern Thailand , 2007, Epidemiology and Infection.

[13]  Using Google Dengue Trends to Estimate Climate Effects in Mexico , 2013, Online Journal of Public Health Informatics.

[14]  D. Focks,et al.  Dynamic life table model for Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): analysis of the literature and model development. , 1993, Journal of medical entomology.

[15]  Jeremy Ginsberg,et al.  Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data , 2009, Nature.

[16]  P Reiter,et al.  Climate change and mosquito-borne disease. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[17]  A. Galvani,et al.  The Interactive Roles of Aedes aegypti Super-Production and Human Density in Dengue Transmission , 2012, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[18]  H M Yang,et al.  Assessing the effects of temperature on dengue transmission , 2009, Epidemiology and Infection.

[19]  John S. Brownstein,et al.  The global distribution and burden of dengue , 2013, Nature.

[20]  B. Kay,et al.  Effects of temperature and larval diet on development rates and survival of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti in north Queensland, Australia , 2000, Medical and veterinary entomology.

[21]  Taha Kass-Hout,et al.  A New Approach to Monitoring Dengue Activity , 2011, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[22]  J. Brownstein,et al.  Social and news media enable estimation of epidemiological patterns early in the 2010 Haitian cholera outbreak. , 2012, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[23]  J. Patz,et al.  Climate variability and change in the United States: potential impacts on vector- and rodent-borne diseases. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.