Multi-mediated community structure in a socio-technical network

Digital environments for networked learning and professional networks may not comprise one "community:" identification of clusters of affiliated groups of participants that potentially constitute embedded communities is an empirical matter, and one of interest to managers of large learning and professional networks. Also, these socio-technical networks are typically multi-mediated, in that they offer multiple means of participation, each with their own interactional affordances. Different communities may be using the multiple media in different ways. We have developed an analytic framework for extracting events from log files and representing interaction and affiliations at different granularities as needed for analysis. In this paper we show how bimodal networks of actors and media artifacts can be constructed in which directed arcs relate actors to the artifacts they read, write or edit, and how the resulting graphs can be used to detect community structures that extend across different media. We illustrate these ideas with a study that characterizes community structure within the Tapped In network of educational professionals, and how the associations between members of this network are distributed across media (chat rooms, discussion forums and file sharing).

[1]  Roy Pea Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning: Foreword , 2004 .

[2]  Sune Lehmann,et al.  Link communities reveal multiscale complexity in networks , 2009, Nature.

[3]  Umer Farooq,et al.  Sustaining a Community Computing Infrastructure for Online Teacher Professional Development: A Case Study of Designing Tapped In , 2009, Learning in Communities.

[4]  Christophe G. Giraud-Carrier,et al.  Implicit affinity networks and social capital , 2009, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[5]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network , 2008, WWW.

[6]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  OpenOrd: an open-source toolbox for large graph layout , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[7]  Paul Hildreth,et al.  Communities of practice : creating learning environments for educators , 2008 .

[8]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  A unified framework for multi-level analysis of distributed learning , 2011, LAK.

[9]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Identifying Mediators of Socio-Technical Capital in a Networked Learning Environment. , 2010 .

[10]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Worldwide Buzz: Planetary-Scale Views on an Instant-Messaging Network , 2007, WWW 2008.

[11]  Steve Gregory,et al.  Finding Overlapping Communities Using Disjoint Community Detection Algorithms , 2009, CompleNet.

[12]  Zbigniew Smoreda,et al.  Are social networks technologically embedded?: How networks are changing today with changes in communication technology , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[13]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  On Modularity Clustering , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[14]  Renaud Lambiotte,et al.  Line graphs of weighted networks for overlapping communities , 2010 .

[15]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millennium , 2001 .

[16]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[17]  D. Garrison,et al.  Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[18]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[19]  E. Wenger,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[20]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society , 2005, Nature.

[21]  Manuel Castells,et al.  The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society , 2001 .

[22]  U. Brandes A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality , 2001 .

[23]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Growing by Degrees: Online Education in the United States, 2005. , 2005 .

[24]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[25]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  A framework for conceptualizing, representing, and analyzing distributed interaction , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[26]  Terry Anderson,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Online Learning , 2009 .

[27]  Tony Blackshaw,et al.  The Symbolic Construction of Community , 2010 .

[28]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Crowds and communities: Light and heavyweight models of peer production , 2009 .

[29]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  Zohreh Azimifar,et al.  Degrees of Separation in Social Networks , 2011, SOCS.

[31]  P. Resnick Beyond Bowling Together: SocioTechnical Capital , 2001 .

[32]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[33]  Terry Anderson,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Online Learning: Second Edition , 2008 .

[34]  Margaret Hollis,et al.  Community and civil society , 2001 .

[35]  Mark S. Schlager,et al.  Building Virtual Communities: Evolution of an Online Education Community of Practice , 2002 .

[36]  Rob Kling,et al.  Learning About Information Technologies and Social Change: The Contribution of Social Informatics , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[37]  W. R. Howard Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design , 2007 .

[38]  Dan Suthers,et al.  Transcendent communities , 2007, CSCL.

[39]  B. Latour Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .