Diffusion of Scientific Articles across Online Platforms

Online platforms have become the primary source of information about scientific advances for the wider public. As online dissemination of scientific findings increasingly influences personal decision-making and government action, there is a growing necessity and interest in studying how people disseminate research findings online beyond one individual platform. In this paper, we study the simultaneous diffusion of scientific articles across major online platforms based on 63 million mentions of about 7.2 million articles spanning a 7-year period. First, we find commonalities between people sharing science and other content such as news articles and memes. Specifically, we find recurring bursts in the coverage of individual articles with initial bursts co-occurring in time across platforms. This allows for a ranking of individual platforms based on the speed at which they pick up scientific information. Second, we explore specifics of sharing science. We reconstruct the likely underlying structure of information diffusion and investigate the transfer of information about scientific articles within and across different platforms. In particular, we (i) study the role of different users in the dissemination of information to better understand who are the prime sharers of knowledge, (ii) explore the propagation of articles between platforms, and (iii) analyze the structural virality of individual information cascades to place science sharing on the spectrum between pure broadcasting and peer-to-peer diffusion. Our work provides the broadest study to date about the sharing of science online and builds the basis for an informed model of the dynamics of research coverage across platforms.

[1]  Fang Wu,et al.  Novelty and collective attention , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Lost in Propagation? Unfolding News Cycles from the Source , 2021, ICWSM.

[3]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Tracking information epidemics in blogspace , 2005, The 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'05).

[4]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Do Cascades Recur? , 2016, WWW.

[5]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Who says what to whom on twitter , 2011, WWW.

[6]  Dylan Walker,et al.  Creating Social Contagion Through Viral Product Design: A Randomized Trial of Peer Influence in Networks , 2010, ICIS.

[7]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Widespread underprovision on Reddit , 2013, CSCW.

[8]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Characterizing and modeling the dynamics of online popularity , 2010, Physical review letters.

[9]  W. Reinhard,et al.  How people are using Twitter during conferences , 2009 .

[10]  Martin Hilbert,et al.  One Step, Two Step, Network Step? Complementary Perspectives on Communication Flows in Twittered Citizen Protests , 2017 .

[11]  S. Dunwoody,et al.  Interactions with the Mass Media , 2008, Science.

[12]  Sune Lehmann,et al.  Accelerating dynamics of collective attention , 2019, Nature Communications.

[13]  Mike S. Schäfer,et al.  How Do Young Adults Engage With Science and Research on Social Media? Some Preliminary Findings and an Agenda for Future Research , 2018 .

[14]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Lognormal Infection Times of Online Information Spread , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  David A. Smith,et al.  Predicting News Coverage of Scientific Articles , 2018, ICWSM.

[16]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle , 2009, KDD.

[17]  Huzefa Rangwala,et al.  Digging Digg: Comment Mining, Popularity Prediction, and Social Network Analysis , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Web Information Systems and Mining.

[18]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  The Structural Virality of Online Diffusion , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[19]  D. W. Scott,et al.  Multivariate Density Estimation, Theory, Practice and Visualization , 1992 .

[20]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Inferring networks of diffusion and influence , 2010, KDD.

[21]  Sinan Aral,et al.  The spread of true and false news online , 2018, Science.

[22]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  The science of sharing and the sharing of science , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Rediet Abebe Can Cascades be Predicted? , 2014 .

[24]  Jeffrey A. Gottfried,et al.  News use across social media platforms 2016 , 2016 .

[25]  A. Vespignani,et al.  Competition among memes in a world with limited attention , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[26]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Communicating science in social settings , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[28]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[29]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Predicting the popularity of online content , 2008, Commun. ACM.

[30]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Information Contagion: An Empirical Study of the Spread of News on Digg and Twitter Social Networks , 2010, ICWSM.

[31]  Rodrigo Costas,et al.  The unbearable emptiness of tweeting—About journal articles , 2017, PloS one.

[32]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  What's in a Name? Understanding the Interplay between Titles, Content, and Communities in Social Media , 2013, ICWSM.

[33]  Martin W. Bauer,et al.  Public attention to science, 1820‐2010 - a ‘longue duree’ picture , 2012 .

[34]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  Science News Consumption Patterns and Their Implications for Public Understanding of Science , 2015 .

[35]  D. Brossard New media landscapes and the science information consumer , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Gabriel Weimann,et al.  On the Importance of Marginality: One More Step into the Two-Step Flow of Communication , 1982 .

[37]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Talk of the Network: A Complex Systems Look at the Underlying Process of Word-of-Mouth , 2001 .