The Origins of Religious Homophily in a Medium and Large School

How religion influences social interactions, and how social interactions influence religion, are fundamental questions to the sociology of religion. We address these processes and build on Cheadle and Schwadel’s (Soc Sci Res 41:1198–1212, 2012) analysis of selection and influence in religion-based social tie homogeneity (i.e. network–religion autocorrelation) in small schools by analyzing networks from larger schools, by focusing on differences across schools, and by testing different operationalizations of social influence. Using two waves of full network data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health and dynamic longitudinal network SIENA models, we find (1) that both selection and influence impact network–religion autocorrelation; (2) that the factors influencing network–religion autocorrelation vary across school contexts; and (3) that religious influence is proportional to the number of friends in an adolescent’s network, which means influence reflects both the size of an individual’s network and the consistency of religion among members of the network. We conclude by addressing potential reasons for differences across school contexts and by discussing the theoretical logic behind the total similarity effect that best operationalized religious influence.

[1]  C. Steglich,et al.  DYNAMIC NETWORKS AND BEHAVIOR: SEPARATING SELECTION FROM INFLUENCE: separating selection from influence , 2010 .

[2]  P. Schwadel.  Race, Class, Congregational Embeddedness, and Civic and Political Participation , 2012 .

[3]  Christian A. Smith.  Religious participation and network closure among American adolescents , 2003 .

[4]  W. Meeus,et al.  Religious Conversion of Adolescents: Testing the Lofland and Stark Model of Religious Conversion , 1991 .

[5]  Christian A. Smith,et al.  American Evangelicalism: Embattled and Thriving , 1998 .

[6]  C. Wrzus,et al.  Social network changes and life events across the life span: a meta-analysis. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Hugh Louch,et al.  Personal network integration: transitivity and homophily in strong-tie relations , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[8]  J. Felson,et al.  Friends’ religiosity and first sex , 2006 .

[9]  Robert J. Wuthnow.  The restructuring of American religion : society and faith since World War II , 1989 .

[10]  Jacob E. Cheadle,et al.  The differential contributions of teen drinking homophily to new and existing friendships: An empirical assessment of assortative and proximity selection mechanisms. , 2013, Social science research.

[11]  T. Snijders,et al.  Modeling the Coevolution of Networks and Behavior , 2007 .

[12]  C. Boyatzis,et al.  Parent-child communication about religion: Survey and diary data on unilateral transmission and bi-directional reciprocity styles , 2003 .

[13]  Omar Lizardo,et al.  Can Cultural Worldviews Influence Network Composition? , 2010, Social Forces.

[14]  Philip Schwadel,et al.  Age, Period, and Cohort Effects on Religious Activities and Beliefs , 2011 .

[15]  William Sims Bainbridge,et al.  Networks of Faith: Interpersonal Bonds and Recruitment to Cults and Sects , 1980, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  S. Goodreau,et al.  Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks* , 2009, Demography.

[17]  Sheldon Ekland-Olson,et al.  Social Networks and Social Movements: A Microstructural Approach to Differential Recruitment , 1980 .

[18]  Katariina Salmela-Aro,et al.  Pressure to drink but not to smoke: disentangling selection and socialization in adolescent peer networks and peer groups. , 2010, Journal of adolescence.

[19]  mile .QDurkheim mile Durkheim,et al.  The Elementary Forms of Religious Life , 1916 .

[20]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[21]  D. Sherkat.  Handbook of the Sociology of Religion: Religious Socialization , 2003 .

[22]  Robert J. Wuthnow.  America And The Challenges Of Religious Diversity , 2005 .

[23]  M. Schweinberger.  Statistical modelling of network panel data: goodness of fit. , 2012, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[24]  Jacob E. Cheadle,et al.  The 'friendship dynamics of religion,' or the 'religious dynamics of friendship'? A social network analysis of adolescents who attend small schools. , 2012, Social science research.

[25]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Religion, Social Networks, and Life Satisfaction , 2010 .

[26]  Jacob E. Cheadle,et al.  The role of drinking in new and existing friendships across high school settings* , 2013, Health.

[27]  Ruth M. Ripley,et al.  Manual for RSiena , 2011 .

[28]  Mark Regnerus,et al.  The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art , 2000 .

[29]  Richard H R White.  Toward a Theory of Religious Influence , 1968 .

[30]  P. Moran.  Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. , 1950, Biometrika.

[31]  Jacob E. Cheadle,et al.  The Small-school Friendship Dynamics of Adolescent Depressive Symptoms , 2012, Society and mental health.

[32]  Philip Schwadel,et al.  Individual, congregational, and denominational effects on church members' civic participation , 2005 .

[33]  Jacob E. Cheadle,et al.  Social Networks and Civic Participation and Efficacy in Two Evangelical Protestant Churches , 2016 .

[34]  H. Niebuhr.  The Social Sources Of Denominationalism , 1929 .

[35]  Marie Cornwall.  The Determinants of Religious Behavior: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Test , 1989 .

[36]  H. Ebaugh,et al.  Ideology and Recruitment in Religious Groups , 1984 .

[37]  Thomas N. Friemel.  Why context matters: applications of social network analysis , 2008 .

[38]  J. Lofland,et al.  Becoming a world-saver: a theory of conversion to a deviant perspective. , 1965, American sociological review.

[39]  G. Simmel.  A Contribution to the Sociology of Religion , 1905, American Journal of Sociology.