Role of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes.

This study elucidates the mechanisms by which extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) impact permeate water flux and salt rejection during biofouling of reverse osmosis (RO) membranes. RO fouling experiments were conducted with Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, EPS extracted from PAO1 biofilms, and dead PAO1 cells fixed in formaldehyde. While a biofouling layer of dead bacterial cells decreases salt rejection and permeate flux by a biofilm-enhanced osmotic pressure mechanism, the EPS biofouling layer adversely impacts permeate flux by increasing the hydraulic resistance to permeate flow. During controlled fouling experiments with extracted EPS in a simulated wastewater solution, polysaccharides adsorbed on the RO membranes much more effectively than proteins (adsorption efficiencies of 61.2-88.7% and 11.6-12.4% for polysaccharides and proteins, respectively). Controlled fouling experiments with EPS in sodium chloride solutions supplemented with 0.5 mM calcium ions (total ionic strength of 15 mM) indicate that calcium increases the adsorption efficiency of polysaccharides and DNA by 2- and 3-fold, respectively. The increased adsorption of EPS onto the membrane resulted in a significant decrease in permeate water flux. Corroborating with these calcium effects, atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements demonstrated that addition of calcium ions to the feed solution results in a marked increase in the adhesion forces between a carboxylated particle probe and the EPS layer. The increase in the interfacial adhesion forces is attributed to specific EPS-calcium interactions that play a major role in biofouling of RO membranes.

[1]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: Role of biofilm-enhanced osmotic pressure , 2007 .

[2]  K. Keiding,et al.  Extraction of extracellular polymers from activated sludge using a cation exchange resin , 1996 .

[3]  G. Whitesides,et al.  A Survey of Structure−Property Relationships of Surfaces that Resist the Adsorption of Protein , 2001 .

[4]  F. Digiano,et al.  Influence of NOM composition on nanofiltration , 1996 .

[5]  J. Georgiadis,et al.  Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades , 2008, Nature.

[6]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Protein antifouling mechanisms of PAN UF membranes incorporating PAN-g-PEO additive , 2007 .

[7]  Christopher Bellona,et al.  Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment--a literature review. , 2004, Water research.

[8]  H. Flemming,et al.  Biofouling in water systems – cases, causes and countermeasures , 2002, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[9]  E. Molis,et al.  The effect of CA membrane properties on adsorptive fouling by humic acid , 1999 .

[10]  G. Oron,et al.  Influence of biofouling on boron removal by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes , 2008 .

[11]  I. Pinnau,et al.  Fouling of reverse osmosis membranes by biopolymers in wastewater secondary effluent: Role of membrane surface properties and initial permeate flux , 2007 .

[12]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Fatty acid fouling of reverse osmosis membranes: implications for wastewater reclamation. , 2008, Water research.

[13]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Coupling between chemical and physical interactions in natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes: implications for fouling control , 2002 .

[14]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Protein (BSA) fouling of reverse osmosis membranes : Implications for wastewater reclamation , 2007 .

[15]  R. Summers,et al.  Extra-cellular polysaccharides, soluble microbial products, and natural organic matter impact on nanofiltration membranes flux decline. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 2001 .

[17]  Albert S Kim,et al.  EPS biofouling in membrane filtration: an analytic modeling study. , 2006, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[18]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Organic fouling and chemical cleaning of nanofiltration membranes: measurements and mechanisms. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Plasmid DNA adsorption on silica: kinetics and conformational changes in monovalent and divalent salts. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[20]  S. Esplugas,et al.  Ultrafiltration of aqueous solutions containing dextran , 2006 .

[21]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Physiology and genetic traits of reverse osmosis membrane biofilms: a case study with Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2008, The ISME Journal.

[22]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Relating organic fouling of reverse osmosis membranes to intermolecular adhesion forces. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by humic acid—Effects of solution composition and hydrodynamic conditions , 2007 .

[24]  Hans-Curt Flemming,et al.  Reverse osmosis membrane biofouling , 1997 .

[25]  Gary Amy,et al.  Role of soluble microbial products (SMP) in membrane fouling and flux decline. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  Christopher Bellona,et al.  Effect of membrane fouling on transport of organic contaminants in NF/RO membrane applications , 2006 .

[27]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes , 1997 .

[28]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  Biofouling potential of various NF membranes with respect to bacteria and their soluble microbial products (SMP): Characterizations, flux decline, and transport parameters , 2005 .

[29]  Hong Liu,et al.  Extraction of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of sludges. , 2002, Journal of biotechnology.

[30]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Relating Nanofiltration Membrane Performance to Membrane Charge (Electrokinetic) Characteristics , 2000 .

[31]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Chemical and physical aspects of cleaning of organic-fouled reverse osmosis membranes , 2006 .

[32]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: a new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of Crossflow Membrane Filter Geometry and Shear Rate on Colloidal Fouling in Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Separations , 2002 .

[34]  F. Smith,et al.  Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related Substances , 1956 .

[35]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Synergistic effects in combined fouling of a loose nanofiltration membrane by colloidal materials and natural organic matter , 2006 .

[36]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  The effect of imposed flux on biofouling in reverse osmosis: Role of concentration polarisation and biofilm enhanced osmotic pressure phenomena , 2008 .

[37]  M. Turakhia,et al.  Activity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms: Effect of calcium , 1989, Biotechnology and bioengineering.