Effect of Adsorbent Porosity on Performance of Expanded Bed Chromatography of Proteins

Expanded bed or fluidized bed adsorption has emerged as an important unit operation in downstream processing of proteins. A number of specifically designed commercial adsorbents are available today for expanded bed purification of proteins. Protein purification essentially requires adsorbent matrices that have large pore size. Very large pore size or macroporous adsorbents can provide high efficiency in packed beds even at high flow rates on account of reduced pore diffusion resistance resulting from finite intraparticle flow in the macropores. This is reflected in leveling off of HETP (height equivalent to theoretical plate) versus flow curve after a threshold velocity. Expanded bed operation, on the other hand, can also show plateauing of the HETP curve, but not necessarily on account of macroporosity of adsorbent. It is shown in this article how any adsorbent intended for protein adsorption in expanded bed mode can give plateauing HETP curve, regardless of pore size. As a result, RTD measurements on an expanded bed can give equal, and at times better, performance than a corresponding packed bed. Large pore size, on the other hand, can result in lesser retention of biomass and easy flushing of the adsorbent to obtain an entirely particulate‐free adsorbent prior to the product elution step. Adsorbent with larger pores is also shown to provide faster and more efficient elution both in packed and expanded bed modes.

[1]  M. Kula,et al.  Cell/adsorbent interactions in expanded bed adsorption of proteins , 1999, Bioseparation.

[2]  James T. Hsu,et al.  Experimental studies of restricted protein diffusion in an agarose matrix , 1992 .

[3]  J. F. Richardson,et al.  Sedimentation and fluidisation: Part I , 1997 .

[4]  D. Seguin,et al.  Liquid—solid mass transfer in packed beds of variously shaped particles at low Reynolds numbers: experiments and model , 1996 .

[5]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Protein separation by liquid chromatography using permeable POROS Q/M particles , 1996 .

[6]  C. Wen,et al.  Longitudinal dispersion of liquid flowing through fixed and fluidized beds , 1968 .

[7]  P. Gustavsson,et al.  Direct measurements of convective fluid velocities in superporous agarose beads. , 1998, Journal of chromatography. A.

[8]  H. Chase,et al.  Purification of proteins by adsorption chromatography in expanded beds. , 1994, Trends in biotechnology.

[9]  F. Zuiderweg,et al.  Longitudinal diffusion and resistance to mass transfer as causes of nonideality in chromatography , 1995 .

[10]  R. Hjorth Expanded bed adsorption: elution in expanded bed mode , 1999 .

[11]  Nir Avinoam,et al.  Simultaneous intraparticle forced convection, diffusion and reaction in a porous catalyst , 1977 .

[12]  Shuichi Yamamoto,et al.  SCALING UP OF MEDIUM-PERFORMANCE GEL FILTRATION CHROMATOGRAPHY OF PROTEINS , 1986 .

[13]  A. Lali,et al.  Enhanced performance of expanded bed chromatography on rigid superporous adsorbent matrix. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. A.