Thoracoscopic Neonatal Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair: "How We Do It".

Background: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a relatively common congenital anomaly, typically requiring repair in the neonatal period. Approaches to surgical repair of a CDH are varied. A small defect may be repaired primarily while a large defect often requires a patch repair. Minimally invasive and open techniques have been reported to have varying benefits and outcomes. Materials and Methods: The authors describe their technique of CDH repair and present a review of the literature. Results: In a stabilized neonate with a small-to-moderate CDH defect, a thoracoscopic primary repair with biological mesh underlay (or a patch repair if needed to reduce tension) represents our approach of choice to treat this pathology. However, attention to specific technical details is required to minimize incidence of recurrence. Conclusions: The data favor a minimally invasive approach to CDH repair in the appropriate patients.

[1]  M. Clifton,et al.  Biologic Mesh Underlay in Thoracoscopic Primary Repair of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Confers Reduced Recurrence in Neonates: A Preliminary Report. , 2019, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[2]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Risk factors for recurrence after thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). , 2018, Journal of Pediatric Surgery.

[3]  M. Clifton,et al.  Thoracoscopic Repair of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia After Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Feasibility and Outcomes. , 2018, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[4]  M. Clifton,et al.  Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia and Diaphragmatic Eventration. , 2017, Clinics in perinatology.

[5]  A. Schulman,et al.  Thoracoscopic Versus Open Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair: Single Tertiary Center Review. , 2017, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[6]  Niki Matusko,et al.  Outcomes for thoracoscopic versus open repair of small to moderate congenital diaphragmatic hernias. , 2017, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[7]  L. Putnam,et al.  Minimally Invasive vs Open Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair: Is There a Superior Approach? , 2017, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[8]  A. Schlager,et al.  Tube Thoracostomy at the Time of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair: Reassessing the Risks and Benefits. , 2017, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[9]  D. Kays,et al.  Outcomes in the physiologically most severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) patients: Whom should we treat? , 2015, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[10]  KuoJen Tsao,et al.  Minimally invasive repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. , 2011, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[11]  C. M. Cotten,et al.  Protocolized approach to the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: benefits of reducing variability in care. , 2010, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[12]  D. Tibboel,et al.  Thoracoscopic repair in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: patching is safe and reduces the recurrence rate. , 2010, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[13]  L. Cassidy,et al.  Beyond feasibility: a comparison of newborns undergoing thoracoscopic and open repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernias. , 2009, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[14]  Andrew J Rozmiarek,et al.  Primary thoracoscopic repair of diaphragmatic hernia with pericostal sutures. , 2005, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[15]  J. Vacanti,et al.  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: arterial structural changes and persistent pulmonary hypertension after surgical repair. , 1985, The Journal of pediatrics.

[16]  S. Krishnaswami,et al.  Analysis of 29 consecutive thoracoscopic repairs of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates compared to historical controls. , 2009, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[17]  T. Kane,et al.  Minimally invasive congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair: a 7-year review of one institution’s experience , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.