First-degree atrioventricular block on basal electrocardiogram predicts future arrhythmic events in patients with Brugada syndrome: a long-term follow-up study from the Veneto region of Northeastern Italy

Aims This study was designed to assess the prognostic value of clinical and electrocardiographic parameters in Brugada syndrome (BrS). Methods and results The study population included 272 consecutive patients (82% males; mean age 43 ± 12 years), with either a spontaneous (n = 137, 50%) or drug-induced (n = 135, 50%) Type 1 Brugada electrocardiogram (ECG) pattern. The study combined endpoint included sudden cardiac death (SCD), cardiac arrest, and appropriate intervention of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). A first-degree atrioventricular (AV) block (PR = 219 ± 17 ms) was documented at basal ECG in 45 patients (16.5%); 27 of these underwent an electrophysiological study with recording in 21 (78%) of an HV interval ≥55 ms (mean 61 ± 3 ms). Patients with first-degree AV block had a wider QRS complex (median 110 ms vs. 95 ms; P = 0.04) and more often showed a left anterior hemiblock pattern (n = 13, 29% vs. n = 35, 16%; P = 0.056). During a mean follow-up of 85 ± 55 months, 17 patients (6.3%) experienced ≥1 major arrhythmic events (appropriate ICD intervention, n = 13 and SCD, n = 4). At univariate analysis, the occurrence of major arrhythmic events was significantly associated with a history of syncope or cardiac arrest (P < 0.001), Type 1 ECG pattern (P = 0.04), and first-degree AV block (P < 0.001). Univariate and multivariable predictors of events included a history of syncope or cardiac arrest [hazard ratio (HR) 5.8, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.04-16.5; P < 0.001; and HR 6.68, 95% CI 2.34-19.1; P < 0.001; respectively], a spontaneous Type 1 ECG pattern (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.03-4.24; P = 0.033; and HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.01-4.29; P = 0.044; respectively) and a first-degree AV block at baseline ECG (HR 3.84, 95% CI 1.47-9.99; P = 0.006; and HR 4.65, 95% CI 2.34-19.1; P = 0.002; respectively). Conclusion Besides a history of cardiac arrest or syncope, first-degree AV block on basal ECG is an independent predictor of malignant arrhythmic events and a stronger marker of arrhythmic risk than a spontaneous 'coved-type' ECG pattern in patients with BrS.

[1]  Fa‐Po Chung Risk stratification beyond electrocardiographic manifestation in Brugada syndrome: The important parameter of PR interval , 2019, Journal of arrhythmia.

[2]  R. Pranata,et al.  Association between PR Interval, First‐degree atrioventricular block and major arrhythmic events in patients with Brugada syndrome – Systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2019, Journal of arrhythmia.

[3]  D. Calvo,et al.  Insights for Stratification of Risk in Brugada Syndrome , 2018, European cardiology.

[4]  P. Rattanawong,et al.  Baseline fragmented QRS increases the risk of major arrhythmic events in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2018, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[5]  Toshihiro Tanaka,et al.  Genotype-Phenotype Correlation of SCN5A Mutation for the Clinical and Electrocardiographic Characteristics of Probands With Brugada Syndrome: A Japanese Multicenter Registry , 2017, Circulation.

[6]  A. Capucci,et al.  A New Electrocardiographic Marker of Sudden Death in Brugada Syndrome: The S-Wave in Lead I. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  P. Ellinor,et al.  Programmed Ventricular Stimulation for Risk Stratification in the Brugada Syndrome: A Pooled Analysis , 2016, Circulation.

[8]  H. Huikuri,et al.  J-Wave syndromes expert consensus conference report: Emerging concepts and gaps in knowledge , 2016, Journal of arrhythmia.

[9]  P. Brugada,et al.  Prognostic Value of Programmed Electrical Stimulation in Brugada Syndrome: 20 Years Experience , 2015, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[10]  H. Morita,et al.  Electrocardiographic parameters and fatal arrhythmic events in patients with Brugada syndrome: combination of depolarization and repolarization abnormalities. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  F. Sacher,et al.  Prevalence and prognostic role of various conduction disturbances in patients with the Brugada syndrome. , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  Y. Yokoyama,et al.  The prognostic value of early repolarization (J wave) and ST-segment morphology after J wave in Brugada syndrome: multicenter study in Japan. , 2013, Heart rhythm.

[13]  S. Priori,et al.  [Risk stratification in Brugada syndrome]. , 2011, Giornale italiano di cardiologia.

[14]  Michael J Ackerman,et al.  HRS/EHRA expert consensus statement on the state of genetic testing for the channelopathies and cardiomyopathies: this document was developed as a partnership between the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). , 2011, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[15]  F. Gaita,et al.  Risk stratification in individuals with the Brugada type 1 ECG pattern without previous cardiac arrest: usefulness of a combined clinical and electrophysiologic approach , 2010, European heart journal.

[16]  Y. Okumura,et al.  Prolonged QRS duration in lead V2 and risk of life-threatening ventricular Arrhythmia in patients with Brugada syndrome. , 2011, International heart journal.

[17]  M Borggrefe,et al.  Long-Term Prognosis of Patients Diagnosed With Brugada Syndrome: Results From the FINGER Brugada Syndrome Registry , 2010, Circulation.

[18]  E. W. Hancock,et al.  AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part III: intraventricular conduction disturbances: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  Tohru Ohe,et al.  Fragmented QRS as a Marker of Conduction Abnormality and a Predictor of Prognosis of Brugada Syndrome , 2008, Circulation.

[20]  Y. Yokoyama,et al.  Clinical Characteristics and Risk Stratification in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients with Brugada Syndrome: Multicenter Study in Japan , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[21]  F. Sacher,et al.  Progressive Cardiac Conduction Defect is the Prevailing Phenotype in Carriers of a Brugada Syndrome SCN5A Mutation , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[22]  W. Shimizu Does an Overlap Syndrome Really Exist Between Brugada Syndrome and Progressive Cardiac Conduction Defect (Lenegre Syndrome)? , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[23]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Long-Term Prognosis of Individuals With Right Precordial ST-Segment–Elevation Brugada Syndrome , 2005, Circulation.

[24]  W. Shimizu,et al.  Electrophysiologic characteristics andimplications of induced ventricular fibrillationin symptomatic patients with brugada syndrome , 2002 .

[25]  D. Corrado,et al.  Right Bundle Branch Block, Right Precordial ST-Segment Elevation, and Sudden Death in Young People , 2001, Circulation.