The impact of media on collaborative learning in virtual settings: social construction and social presence perspectives

Prior work argues that collaborative learning facilitates the construction of individuals ’ knowledge, because it fosters the information sharing and discussions with other students. This may, in turn, improve learning effectiveness. However, how effective collaborative technolog ies may facilitate collaborative learning remains to be addressed. To handle this, this study developed a model by drawing on social presence and task closure theories. More specifically, we delineated the relationships between learning environment (the media environment and medium choice) and learning effectiveness. To test the above relationships, we employed laboratory experiment. Most of hypotheses were supported.

[1]  Ross Hightower,et al.  Effects of Communication Mode and Prediscussion Information Distribution Characteristics on Information Exchange in Groups , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  David L. Paul,et al.  Collaborative Activities in Virtual Settings: A Knowledge Management Perspective of Telemedicine , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Managing Client Dialogues During Information Systems Design to Facilitate Client Learning , 2005, MIS Q..

[4]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[5]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The Use of Information Technology to Enhance Management School Education: A Theoretical View , 1995, MIS Q..

[6]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[7]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[8]  D. Straub,et al.  Knowledge Worker Communications and Recipient Availability: Toward a Task Closure Explanation of Media Choice , 1998 .

[9]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Using IT to Reengineer Business Education: An Exploratory Investigation of Collaborative Telelearning , 1995, MIS Q..

[10]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[11]  Betty Vandenbosch,et al.  Information Overload in a Groupware Environment: Now You See It, Now You Don't , 1998, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[12]  Abhijit Gopal,et al.  Understanding GDSS in Symbolic Context: Shifting the Focus from Technology to Interaction , 2000, MIS Q..

[13]  E. Cohen Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[14]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  The Social Construction of Meaning: An Alternative Perspective on Information Sharing , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  T. Davenport,et al.  The attention economy: understanding the new currency of business [Book Review] , 2001, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[16]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Information Is What You Make of It: The Influence of Group History and Computer Support on Information Sharing, Decision Quality, and Member Perceptions , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  A. Dennis INFORMATION PROCESSING IN GROUP DECISION MAKING: YOU CAN LEAD A GROUP TO INFORMATION, BUT YOU CAN'T MAKE IT THINK. , 1993 .