Binocularity in the human visual evoked potential: facilitation, summation and suppression.

The electrophysiology of normal binocular function was investigated by studying the binocular interactions from monocular and binocular visual evoked potentials (VEPs) recorded under a range of stimulus conditions. The amplitude and phase of the steady-state VEPs, which were obtained with sinusoidal gratings temporally modulated in counterphase, were measured with synchronous narrow-band filtering techniques. Binocular interactions were investigated as functions of spatial frequency, temporal frequency and contrast. Detailed sampling and testing within each stimulus domain revealed an unprecedented degree of VEP specificity in the extent of binocular interaction, which varied from zero summation to pronounced facilitation. Binocular facilitation was explored in terms of its relation to the neural mechanisms subserving binocular function. VEP correlates of rivalry, fusion and stereopsis were obtained. The facilitatory binocular interactions, revealed by careful spatial and temporal stimulus manipulations, were akin more to the neurophysiological responses of single neurons than to previously reported evoked potential work. The relationship between the specificity and narrow tuning of the binocular interactions recorded with VEP techniques and those recorded with single unit techniques is discussed.

[1]  R D GUNKEL,et al.  ELECTRONIC COMPUTATION OF HUMAN RETINAL AND BRAIN RESPONSES TO LIGHT STIMULATION , 1964, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  A. Bethe,et al.  Handbuch der Normalen und Pathologischen Physiologie , 1925 .

[4]  G B Arden,et al.  Visually evoked responses in amblyopia. , 1974, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  L Cigánek,et al.  Binocular addition of the visually evoked response with different stimulus intensities in man. , 1970, Vision research.

[6]  D. Spinelli,et al.  An electrophysiological correlate of perceptual suppression in anisometropia , 1978, Vision Research.

[7]  M. R. Harter,et al.  Binocular summation of visually evoked responses to pattern stimuli in humans. , 1973, Vision research.

[8]  S. J. Fricker.  Narrow-band filter techniques for the detection and measurement of evoked responses. , 1962, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  J. G. McCoy,et al.  Binocular addition of the visual evoked response at different cortical locations. , 1968, Vision research.

[10]  B. Nilsson,et al.  VISUAL EVOKED RESPONSES TO PATTERN‐REVERSAL STIMULATION IN PATIENTS WITH AMBLYOPIA AND/OR DEFECTIVE BINOCULAR FUNCTIONS , 1978, Acta ophthalmologica.

[11]  P. O. Bishop.  NEURAL MECHANISMS FOR BINOCULAR DEPTH DISCRIMINATION , 1981 .

[12]  G. Poggio,et al.  Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  F. Campbell,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of orientation and size detectors in the human visual system , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  G. Westheimer.  Vertical disparity detection: is there an induced size effect? , 1978, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  K Nakayama,et al.  Rapid assessment of visual function: an electronic sweep technique for the pattern visual evoked potential. , 1979, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  H Spekreijse,et al.  Contrast evoked responses in man. , 1973, Vision research.

[17]  D. Hubel,et al.  Shape and arrangement of columns in cat's striate cortex , 1963, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Binocular vision tested with visual evoked potentials in children and infants. , 1978, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  D. Regan.  Assessment of visual acuity by evoked potential recording: Ambiguity caused by temporal dependence of spatial frequency selectivity , 1978, Vision Research.

[20]  W. Cobb,et al.  Cerebral Potentials evoked by Pattern Reversal and their Suppression in Visual Rivalry , 1967, Nature.

[21]  R. Srebro.  The visually evoked response. Binocular facilitation and failure when binocular vision is disturbed. , 1978, Archives of ophthalmology.

[22]  C. T. White,et al.  BINOCULAR SUMMATION IN THE EVOKED POTENTIAL AS A FUNCTION OF IMAGE QUALITY* , 1970, American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry.