Fundamental x-ray interaction limits in diagnostic imaging detectors: spatial resolution.

The practice of diagnostic x-ray imaging has been transformed with the emergence of digital detector technology. Although digital systems offer many practical advantages over conventional film-based systems, their spatial resolution performance can be a limitation. The authors present a Monte Carlo study to determine fundamental resolution limits caused by x-ray interactions in four converter materials: Amorphous silicon (a-Si), amorphous selenium, cesium iodide, and lead iodide. The "x-ray interaction" modulation transfer function (MTF) was determined for each material and compared in terms of the 50% MTF spatial frequency and Wagner's effective aperture for incident photon energies between 10 and 150 keV and various converter thicknesses. Several conclusions can be drawn from their Monte Carlo study. (i) In low-Z (a-Si) converters, reabsorption of Compton scatter x rays limits spatial resolution with a sharp MTF drop at very low spatial frequencies (< 0.3 cycles/mm), especially above 60 keV; while in high-Z materials, reabsorption of characteristic x rays plays a dominant role, resulting in a mid-frequency (1-5 cycles/mm) MTF drop. (ii) Coherent scatter plays a minor role in the x-ray interaction MTF. (iii) The spread of energy due to secondary electron (e.g., photoelectrons) transport is significant only at very high spatial frequencies. (iv) Unlike the spread of optical light in phosphors, the spread of absorbed energy from x-ray interactions does not significantly degrade spatial resolution as converter thickness is increased. (v) The effective aperture results reported here represent fundamental spatial resolution limits of the materials tested and serve as target benchmarks for the design and development of future digital x-ray detectors.

[1]  R. Murty,et al.  Gamma ray absorption coefficients , 1964 .

[2]  F. Spiers Physics of Radiology , 1968, Nature.

[3]  R. K. Swank,et al.  Calculation of modulation transfer functions of x-ray fluorescent screens. , 1973, Applied optics.

[4]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Toward a unified view of radiological imaging systems. Part II: Noisy images , 1974 .

[5]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Toward a unified view of radiological imaging systems. Part I: Noiseless images. , 1974, Medical physics.

[6]  B E Bjärngard,et al.  The effect of phosphor K x-rays on the MFT of rare-earth screens. , 1979, Medical physics.

[7]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Relativistic atomic form factors and photon coherent scattering cross sections , 1979 .

[8]  David W. O. Rogers,et al.  Low energy electron transport with EGS , 1984 .

[9]  W. Nelson,et al.  Monte Carlo Transport of Electrons and Photons , 1988 .

[10]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Tables and graphs of atomic subshell and relaxation data derived from the LLNL Evaluated Atomic Data Library (EADL), Z=1-100 , 1991 .

[11]  G. Barnes,et al.  Semiempirical model for generating tungsten target x-ray spectra. , 1991, Medical physics.

[12]  F. H. Attix Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry , 1991 .

[13]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for Elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 Additional Substances of Dosimetric Interest , 1995 .

[14]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: inherent spatial resolution. , 1995, Medical physics.

[15]  I. Blevis,et al.  Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: construction and evaluation of a prototype real-time detector. , 1997, Medical physics.

[16]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray detectors for digital radiography. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Kanai S. Shah,et al.  X-ray imaging using lead iodide as a semiconductor detector , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[18]  J A Seibert,et al.  A Monte Carlo study of x-ray fluorescence in x-ray detectors. , 1999, Medical physics.

[19]  Aldo Badano Image quality degradation by light scattering processes in high performance display devices for medical imaging , 1999 .

[20]  Shi Yin,et al.  Image quality of a prototype direct conversion detector for digital mammography , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[21]  John A. Rowlands,et al.  Flat Panel Detectors for Digital Radiography , 2000 .

[22]  I. Kawrakow Accurate condensed history Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport. I. EGSnrc, the new EGS4 version. , 2000, Medical physics.

[23]  Kanai S. Shah,et al.  High-resolution direct-detection x-ray imagers , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[24]  P. Granfors,et al.  Performance of a 41X41-cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications. , 2000, Medical physics.

[25]  S Suryanarayanan,et al.  Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. , 2000, Medical physics.

[26]  Kanai S. Shah,et al.  Comparative study of Pbl2 and Hgl2 as direct detector materials for high-resolution x-ray image sensors , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[27]  John A. Rowlands,et al.  Effect of depth-dependent modulation transfer function and K-fluorescence reabsorption on the detective quantum efficiency of indirect-conversion flat-panel x-ray imaging systems using CsI , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[28]  John A. Rowlands,et al.  Investigation of imaging performance of amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors for digital mammography , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[29]  J A Rowlands,et al.  Effects of characteristic x rays on the noise power spectra and detective quantum efficiency of photoconductive x-ray detectors. , 2001, Medical physics.

[30]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  A slot-scanned photodiode-array/CCD hybrid detector for digital mammography. , 2002, Medical physics.

[31]  D. Holdsworth,et al.  Micro-CT in small animal and specimen imaging , 2002 .

[32]  Aldo Badano,et al.  Depth-dependent phosphor blur in indirect x-ray imaging sensors , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[33]  Kanai S. Shah,et al.  Comparison of PbI2 and HgI2 for direct detection active matrix x-ray image sensors , 2002 .

[34]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Digital Mammography , 2019, Advances in Clinical Radiology.

[35]  Qihua Zhao,et al.  System performance of a prototype flat-panel imager operated under mammographic conditions. , 2003, Medical physics.

[36]  A. Badano Optical blur and collection efficiency in columnar phosphors for X-ray imaging , 2003 .

[37]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector. , 2003, Medical physics.

[38]  R. Street,et al.  A comparison of x-ray detectors for mouse CT imaging , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  Goran Ristic,et al.  X-ray imaging performance of structured cesium iodide scintillators. , 2004, Medical physics.

[40]  Ian A. Cunningham,et al.  Penalty on the detective quantum efficiency from off-axis incident x rays , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[41]  Qihua Zhao,et al.  Segmented phosphors: MEMS-based high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging. , 2005, Medical physics.

[42]  I. Cunningham,et al.  Segmented crystalline scintillators: an initial investigation of high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging. , 2005, Medical physics.

[43]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  XCOM : Photon Cross Sections Database , 2005 .

[44]  Michael P. Kempston,et al.  Resolution at oblique incidence angles of a flat panel imager for breast tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[45]  J. Sempau,et al.  MANTIS: combined x-ray, electron and optical Monte Carlo simulations of indirect radiation imaging systems , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[46]  Aldo Badano,et al.  Anisotropic imaging performance in indirect x-ray imaging detectors. , 2006, Medical physics.

[47]  Qihua Zhao,et al.  Segmented crystalline scintillators: empirical and theoretical investigation of a high quantum efficiency EPID based on an initial engineering prototype CsI(TI) detector. , 2006, Medical physics.

[48]  Aldo Badano,et al.  Anisotropic imaging performance in breast tomosynthesis. , 2007, Medical physics.

[49]  I A Cunningham,et al.  Fundamental x-ray interaction limits in diagnostic imaging detectors: frequency-dependent Swank noise. , 2008, Medical physics.

[50]  Iwan Kawrakow,et al.  NRC User Codes for EGSnrc , 2010 .