Integrating scenic and recreational amenities into numerical forest planning

This study proposes an operational way of computing the amenity value of a forest area that consists of several stands or compartments. Such a method produces an amenity index suitable for numerical optimization. With this method of computation, amenity is divided into scenic and recreation values. Scenic value of the forest depends on the visibility, area, and scenic beauty score of different compartments. Recreation value of the forest is a weighted mean of variety and the area-weighted mean recreation value of compartments. Variety is described by the total length of boundaries between distinctly different compartments. Recreation value of a compartment is the product of accessibility and recreation score of the compartment. Recreation and scenic beauty scores are computed from stand characteristics using empirical models. The study describes a complete planning system that uses the developed amenity index as a decision criterion, and relates a case study to illustrate the effect of amenity objective on choice of treatments for compartments.

[1]  Richard Schreyer,et al.  Attribute Preferences for Wildland Recreation Settings , 1986 .

[2]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Prediction of the amenity of a tree stand , 1988 .

[3]  R. W. Hodgson,et al.  Rate of Travel Along an Interpretive Trail , 1980 .

[4]  Heimo Karppinen,et al.  Yksityistilojen hakkuumahdollisuuksien käyttö Etelä-Suomessa. , 1990 .

[5]  F. Ward,et al.  Recreational demand for trees in national forests. , 1989 .

[6]  L. Fishwick,et al.  An exploratory study of outdoor recreation site choices. , 1991 .

[7]  W. Adamowicz,et al.  The travel cost model of recreation demand: theoretical and empirical issues. , 1990 .

[8]  H. Timmermans,et al.  Stated preference and choice models applied to recreation research : a review , 1990 .

[9]  E. Shafer,et al.  How to measure preferences for photographs of natural landscapes , 1977 .

[10]  Reid Kreutzwiser,et al.  Factors influencing integrated forest management on private industrial forest land , 1990 .

[11]  George H. Stankey,et al.  The ROS planning system: Evolution, basic concepts, and research needed , 1987 .

[12]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Forest landscape: A method of amenity evaluation based on computer simulation , 1989 .

[13]  D. M. Holthausen,et al.  The behavior of nonindustrial private forest landowners , 1989 .

[14]  George H. Stankey,et al.  Choosing recreation settings: Processes, findings, and research directions , 1985 .

[15]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[16]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  A method for estimating forest landowner's landscape preferences , 1993 .

[17]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  A heuristic optimization method for forest planning and decision making , 1993 .

[18]  L. Harris,et al.  Designing future landscapes from principles of form and function , 1979 .

[19]  Terry C. Daniel,et al.  Measurement of scenic beauty: the law of comparative judgment and scenic beauty estimation procedures , 1984 .

[20]  D. A. King,et al.  Scenic Beauty and Recreation Value: Assessing the Relationship , 2019, Social Science and Natural Resource Recreation Management.