Predicting microbial pollution concentrations in UK rivers in response to land use change.

The Water Framework Directive has caused a paradigm shift towards the integrated management of recreational water quality through the development of drainage basin-wide programmes of measures. This has increased the need for a cost-effective diagnostic tool capable of accurately predicting riverine faecal indicator organism (FIO) concentrations. This paper outlines the application of models developed to fulfil this need, which represent the first transferrable generic FIO models to be developed for the UK to incorporate direct measures of key FIO sources (namely human and livestock population data) as predictor variables. We apply a recently developed transfer methodology, which enables the quantification of geometric mean presumptive faecal coliforms and presumptive intestinal enterococci concentrations for base- and high-flow during the summer bathing season in unmonitored UK watercourses, to predict FIO concentrations in the Humber river basin district. Because the FIO models incorporate explanatory variables which allow the effects of policy measures which influence livestock stocking rates to be assessed, we carry out empirical analysis of the differential effects of seven land use management and policy instruments (fiscal constraint, production constraint, cost intervention, area intervention, demand-side constraint, input constraint, and micro-level land use management) all of which can be used to reduce riverine FIO concentrations. This research provides insights into FIO source apportionment, explores a selection of pollution remediation strategies and the spatial differentiation of land use policies which could be implemented to deliver river quality improvements. All of the policy tools we model reduce FIO concentrations in rivers but our research suggests that the installation of streamside fencing in intensive milk producing areas may be the single most effective land management strategy to reduce riverine microbial pollution.

[1]  D.L. Jones.  Potential health risks associated with the persistence of Escherichia coli O157 in agricultural environments , 1999 .

[2]  R. C. Ferrier,et al.  Catchment microbial dynamics: the emergence of a research agenda , 2007 .

[3]  David Kay,et al.  Effectiveness of best management practices for attenuating the transport of livestock-derived pathogens within catchments , 2012 .

[4]  M. Aitken,et al.  Predicting the effect of livestock inputs of E. coli on microbiological compliance of bathing waters. , 2004, Water research.

[5]  L Fewtrell,et al.  Faecal indicator organism concentrations and catchment export coefficients in the UK. , 2008, Water research.

[6]  D. Kay,et al.  Generic modelling of faecal indicator organism concentrations in the UK , 2011 .

[7]  A. Lovett,et al.  Robust interpolation of agricultural census data to hydrological units and implications for diffuse pollution modelling , 2009 .

[8]  David Kay,et al.  Faecal-indicator concentrations in waters draining lowland pastoral catchments in the UK: relationships with land use and farming practices. , 2002, Water research.

[9]  D. Kay,et al.  Predicting likelihood of gastroenteritis from sea bathing: results from randomised exposure , 1994, The Lancet.

[10]  D Kay,et al.  Quantitative catchment profiling to apportion faecal indicator organism budgets for the Ribble system, the UK's sentinel drainage basin for Water Framework Directive research. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  I. Bateman,et al.  Cost-Effective Mitigation of Diffuse Pollution: Setting Criteria for River Basin Management at Multiple Locations , 2009, Environmental management.

[12]  D. Kay,et al.  Faecal indicator organism concentrations in sewage and treated effluents. , 2008, Water research.

[13]  D. Kay,et al.  Microbial source tracking: a forensic technique for microbial source identification? , 2007, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[14]  Robert Fish,et al.  Management of livestock and their manure to reduce the risk of microbial transfers to water – the case for an interdisciplinary approach , 2008 .

[15]  Germany: Searching for Strategies to provide pure Water , 2003 .

[16]  Robert Fish,et al.  Scale appropriate modelling of diffuse microbial pollution from agriculture , 2009 .

[17]  F Jones,et al.  Marine waters contaminated with domestic sewage: nonenteric illnesses associated with bather exposure in the United Kingdom. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[18]  Adrian McDonald,et al.  Predicting faecal indicator fluxes using digital land use data in the UK's sentinel Water Framework Directive catchment: the Ribble study. , 2005, Water research.

[19]  D. Kay,et al.  Reducing fluxes of faecal indicator compliance parameters to bathing waters from diffuse agricultural sources: the Brighouse Bay study, Scotland. , 2007, Environmental pollution.

[20]  Leonard J. Tashman,et al.  Out-of-sample tests of forecasting accuracy: an analysis and review , 2000 .

[21]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  Development of a multiobjective optimization tool for the selection and placement of best management practices for nonpoint source pollution control , 2009 .

[22]  E M Mathus-Vliegen,et al.  [Healthy diet]. , 1995, Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde.

[23]  D. Chadwick,et al.  Mitigation and Current Management Attempts to Limit Pathogen Survival and Movement Within Farmed Grassland , 2007 .

[24]  Karim C. Abbaspour,et al.  Assessing the impact of climate change on water resources in Iran , 2009 .

[25]  C. D. de Klein,et al.  Prioritisation of farm scale remediation efforts for reducing losses of nutrients and faecal indicator organisms to waterways: a case study of New Zealand dairy farming. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[26]  Cost curve of nitrate mitigation options , 2004 .

[27]  Estimation of diffuse and point source microbial pollution in the ribble catchment discharging to bathing waters in the north west of England. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[28]  D Kay,et al.  Relationships between microbial water quality and environmental conditions in coastal recreational waters: the Fylde coast, UK. , 2001, Water research.

[29]  I. Bateman,et al.  Structural Agricultural Land Use Modelling , 2009 .

[30]  Hillel Shuval,et al.  Estimating the global burden of thalassogenic diseases: human infectious diseases caused by wastewater pollution of the marine environment. , 2003, Journal of water and health.

[31]  Floor Brouwer,et al.  Governance of Water-related Conflicts in Agriculture , 2003 .

[32]  Ivanildo Hespanhol,et al.  Water Pollution Control: A Guide to the Use of Water Quality Management Principles , 2007 .

[33]  Royce E. Larsen,et al.  Water-quality benefits of having cattle manure deposited away from streams , 1994 .

[34]  John Helming,et al.  Modelling the economic consequences of the EU Water Framework Directive for Dutch agriculture. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[35]  Donald W. Meals,et al.  Watershed-scale response to agricultural diffuse pollution control programs in Vermont, USA , 1996 .

[36]  D. Kay,et al.  Analysing the Agricultural Costs and Non‐market Benefits of Implementing the Water Framework Directive , 2006 .