Subpixel Land Cover Mapping by Integrating Spectral and Spatial Information of Remotely Sensed Imagery

Subpixel mapping (SPM) is a technique to predict spatial locations of land cover classes within mixed pixels in remotely sensed imagery. The two-step approach first estimates fraction images by spectral unmixing and then inputs fraction images into an SPM algorithm to generate the final subpixel land cover map. A shortcoming of this approach is that the information about the credibility of fraction images is not considered. In this letter, we proposed a general framework of SPM which is directly applied to original coarse resolution remotely sensed imagery by integrating spectral and spatial information. Based on the proposed framework, the linear unmixing model and the maximal spatial dependence model were combined to construct a novel SPM model aiming to minimize the least squares error of spectral signature and make the subpixel land cover map spatially smooth, simultaneously. By applying to an Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer hyperspectral image, the proposed model was evaluated both visually and quantitatively by comparing it with hard classification and the two-step SPM approach. The results showed that the regularization parameter, which balances the influence of spectral and spatial terms, plays an important role on the solution. The L-curve approach was a reasonable method to select the regularization parameter, with which an increased accuracy of the proposed model was obtained.

[1]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Dianne P. O'Leary,et al.  The Use of the L-Curve in the Regularization of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems , 1993, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[3]  L. Bastin.  Comparison of fuzzy c-means classification, linear mixture modelling and MLC probabilities as tools for unmixing coarse pixels , 1997 .

[4]  D. Calvetti,et al.  Tikhonov regularization and the L-curve for large discrete ill-posed problems , 2000 .

[5]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Fully constrained least squares linear spectral mixture analysis method for material quantification in hyperspectral imagery , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  Hugh G. Lewis,et al.  Super-resolution target identification from remotely sensed images using a Hopfield neural network , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[7]  Robert De Wulf,et al.  Land cover mapping at sub-pixel scales using linear optimization techniques , 2002 .

[8]  John F. Mustard,et al.  Spectral unmixing , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[9]  G. M. Foody.  The role of soft classification techniques in the refinement of estimates of ground control point location , 2002 .

[10]  Hugh G. Lewis,et al.  Super-resolution land cover pattern prediction using a Hopfield neural network , 2002 .

[11]  L. P. C. Verbeke,et al.  Using genetic algorithms in sub-pixel mapping , 2003 .

[12]  Michael Elad,et al.  Fast and robust multiframe super resolution , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[13]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Super-resolution land cover mapping using a Markov random field based approach , 2005 .

[14]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Super‐resolution mapping of the waterline from remotely sensed data , 2005 .

[15]  P. Atkinson.  Sub-pixel Target Mapping from Soft-classified, Remotely Sensed Imagery , 2005 .

[16]  M. Q. Nguyen,et al.  Superresolution mapping using a Hopfield neural network with lidar data , 2005, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[17]  Hugh G. Lewis,et al.  Superresolution mapping using a hopfield neural network with fused images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Sub‐pixel mapping of rural land cover objects from fine spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery using super‐resolution pixel‐swapping , 2006 .

[19]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Regularization Tools version 4.0 for Matlab 7.3 , 2007, Numerical Algorithms.

[20]  Huong T. X. Doan,et al.  Variability in Soft Classification Prediction and its implications for Sub-pixel Scale Change Detection and Super Resolution Mapping , 2007 .

[21]  F. Ling,et al.  Waterline mapping at the subpixel scale from remote sensing imagery with high‐resolution digital elevation models , 2008 .

[22]  Alfred Stein,et al.  Quantification of the Effects of Land-Cover-Class Spectral Separability on the Accuracy of Markov-Random-Field-Based Superresolution Mapping , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[23]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Issues of uncertainty in super-resolution mapping and their implications for the design of an inter-comparison study , 2009 .

[24]  Fei Xiao,et al.  Super-resolution land-cover mapping using multiple sub-pixel shifted remotely sensed images , 2010 .

[25]  Xiaodong Li,et al.  Land Cover Change Mapping at the Subpixel Scale With Different Spatial-Resolution Remotely Sensed Imagery , 2011, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.