Brewing for Students: An Inquiry-Based Microbiology Lab

In an effort to improve and assess student learning, there has been a push to increase the incorporation of discovery-driven modules and those that contain real-world relevance into laboratory curricula. To further this effort, we have developed, implemented, and assessed an undergraduate microbiology laboratory experiment that requires students to use the scientific method while brewing beer. The experiment allows students to brew their own beer and characterize it based on taste, alcohol content, calorie content, pH, and standard reference method. In addition, we assessed whether students were capable of achieving the module learning objectives through a pre-/posttest, student self-evaluation, exam-embedded questions, and an associated worksheet. These objectives included describing the role of the brewing ingredients and predicting how altering the ingredients would affect the characteristics of the beer, amongst others. By completing this experimental module, students accomplished the module objectives, had greater interest in brewing, and were more likely to view beer in scientific terms. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education.

[1]  Tammy M. Long,et al.  Just the Facts? Introductory Undergraduate Biology Courses Focus on Low-Level Cognitive Skills , 2010, CBE life sciences education.

[2]  Ann C. Smith,et al.  “The Farmer’s Dilemma”—an Interrupted Case Study for Learning Bacterial Genetics in the Context of the Impact of Microbes on the Organic Food Industry and Biotechnology† , 2014, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[3]  David C. Haak,et al.  Increased Structure and Active Learning Reduce the Achievement Gap in Introductory Biology , 2011, Science.

[4]  Steven M. Caruso,et al.  Non-STEM undergraduates become enthusiastic phage-hunters. , 2009, CBE life sciences education.

[5]  Sarah L. Eddy,et al.  Getting Under the Hood: How and for Whom Does Increasing Course Structure Work? , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[6]  Adam M. Kiefer,et al.  Kimchi: Spicy Science for the Undergraduate Microbiology Laboratory † , 2014, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[7]  Alison Crowe,et al.  Biology in bloom: implementing Bloom's Taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[8]  Deborah Allen,et al.  Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: seven strategies, from the simple to complex. , 2005, Cell biology education.

[9]  George S. Howard,et al.  Response-Shift Bias , 1980 .

[10]  Fernando Tavares,et al.  Natural Antibiotics: A Hands-On Activity on Garlic's Antibiotic Properties , 2011 .

[11]  David Lopatto,et al.  Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[12]  Brian K Sato,et al.  Attack of the Killer Fungus: A Hypothesis-Driven Lab Module , 2013, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[13]  Diane Ebert-May,et al.  Innovation in large lectures—teaching for active learning , 1997 .

[14]  Sally G Hoskins,et al.  Selective Use of the Primary Literature Transforms the Classroom Into a Virtual Laboratory , 2007, Genetics.

[15]  W. Wood,et al.  Innovations in teaching undergraduate biology and why we need them. , 2009, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[16]  Brian K. Sato,et al.  Practice Makes Pretty Good: Assessment of Primary Literature Reading Abilities across Multiple Large-Enrollment Biology Laboratory Courses , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[17]  Carolyn F. Weber Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 277 Curriculum , 2022 .

[18]  George S. Howard,et al.  A Problem in Evaluating Interventions with Pre/Post Self-Reports , 1980 .

[19]  Kristen R. Miller,et al.  Redefining Authentic Research Experiences in Introductory Biology Laboratories and Barriers to Their Implementation , 2014, CBE life sciences education.