Continuous Control Monitoring-Based Regulation: A Case in the Meat Processing Industry

Regulation based on Continuous Control Monitoring could reduce the administrative burden for companies. Often, companies already have elaborate internal control and quality management systems. Instead of periodic physical inspections, regulatory supervision can partly be automated and performed on a continuous basis. The regulator gets access to a validated copy of key data elements from the company’s internal information systems, which serve as indicator of compliance to specific control objectives. In this paper we describe an information architecture for continuous control monitoring, and show how it can be applied to supervision of regulatory compliance. The approach is illustrated by a pilot project in the Netherlands of applying continuous control monitoring to food safety regulations in the meat processing industry. Participants concluded that the approach is technically feasible but requires a different mindset towards regulation, and a clear business case.

[1]  J. Hackman,et al.  Total Quality Management: Empirical, Conceptual, and Practical Issues , 1995 .

[2]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches , 1985 .

[3]  John Braithwaite,et al.  Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate , 1992 .

[4]  Wenfei Fan,et al.  Keys with Upward Wildcards for XML , 2001, DEXA.

[5]  W. Robert Knechel,et al.  Auditing: Assurance and Risk , 2000 .

[6]  Lois Quam,et al.  The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification , 1998 .

[7]  Joris Hulstijn,et al.  Rule-based versus Principle-based Regulatory Compliance , 2009, JURIX.

[8]  Boriana Rukanova,et al.  Accelerating Global Supply Chains with IT-Innovation, ITAIDE Tools and Methods , 2010 .

[9]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[10]  J. H. Blokdijk,et al.  Reflections on auditing theory: a contribution from the Netherlands , 1995 .

[11]  Rafael Accorsi,et al.  Compliance Monitor for Early Warning Risk Determination , 2008 .

[12]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Feasibility and Economics of Continuous Assurance , 2002 .

[13]  J. Hulstijn,et al.  Neo-classical principles for information integrity , 2011 .

[14]  Alexander Pretschner,et al.  Towards Systematic Achievement of Compliance in Service-Oriented Architectures: The MASTER Approach , 2008, Wirtsch..

[15]  S. B. Kiselev,et al.  The capability maturity model: guidelines for improving the software process , 1995 .

[16]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Continuous monitoring of business process controls: A pilot implementation of a continuous auditing system at Siemens , 2006, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[17]  M. Korstanje.  The Risk Society: Towards a new modernity , 2009 .

[18]  Yoshinori Sato,et al.  Compliance-Monitor zur Frühwarnung vor Risiken , 2008, Wirtsch..

[19]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Principles of Analytic Monitoring for Continuous Assurance , 2004 .

[20]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Putting Continuous Auditing Theory into Practice: Lessons from Two Pilot Implementations , 2008, J. Inf. Syst..

[21]  M. Vasarhelyi.  THE CONTINUOUS AUDIT OF ONLINE SYSTEMS , 1991 .

[22]  Reind P. van de Riet,et al.  Analysing Enterprises: The Value Cycle Approach , 2000, DEXA.

[23]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Continuous Online Auditing: A Program of Research , 1999, J. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Guido Governatori,et al.  The Journey to Business Process Compliance , 2009, Handbook of Research on Business Process Modeling.