Should a borderline negative HER2 result in a core biopsy of invasive carcinoma of the breast have HER2 assessment repeated in the excision specimen?

Aim The 2015 UK guidelines for HER2 assessment in breast cancer recommended repeat assessment if the core biopsy was scored as 2+ on HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) with borderline negative in situ hybridisation (ratio of number of HER2 to chromosome 17 centromere copies of 1.8–1.99). This case series aimed to assess the value of such repeat assessment in the surgical specimen, in particular the proportion that were HER2 positive. Methods Details of biopsies with 2+ IHC and borderline negative in situ hybridisation were extracted from a database. The results of repeat HER2 testing in the surgical specimen for this cohort study were then obtained. Results 112 patients with no preoperative treatment had repeat assessment: 4 were 3+ and 16 were 2+ amplified. Of 14 with preoperative chemotherapy, 1 was 3+ and 4 were 2+ amplified. All the 2+ amplified carcinomas had a HER2 to chromosome 17 ratio less than 4, in 50% the ratio was between 2.0 and 2.2, and in 50% the HER2 copy number was less than 4. Conclusions Repeat assessment yielded 4% 3+ results and 14% 2+ amplified carcinomas but with low level amplification. These results suggest that retesting of borderline negative HER2 cases should be optional and no longer mandatory.

[1]  I. Ellis,et al.  UK recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer: an update , 2022, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[2]  E. Provenzano,et al.  Receptor Status after Neoadjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer: Significance and Implications , 2022, Pathobiology.

[3]  I. Ellis,et al.  Retrospective observational study of HER2 immunohistochemistry in borderline breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, with an emphasis on Group 2 (HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥2.0, HER2 copy number <4.0 signals/cell) cases , 2021, British Journal of Cancer.

[4]  L. Norton,et al.  Pathologic complete response rate according to HER2 detection methods in HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy , 2019, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[5]  John M S Bartlett,et al.  Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  John M S Bartlett,et al.  Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. , 2018, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[7]  John M S Bartlett,et al.  Updated UK Recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer , 2014, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[8]  John M S Bartlett,et al.  Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[9]  I. Ellis,et al.  Concordance of HER2 status assessed on needle core biopsy and surgical specimens of invasive carcinoma of the breast , 2012, Histopathology.

[10]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Discordance between core needle biopsy (CNB) and excisional biopsy (EB) for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 status in early breast cancer (EBC). , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[11]  Rohit Bhargava,et al.  Clinical importance of HER2 immunohistologic heterogeneous expression in core-needle biopsies vs resection specimens for equivocal (immunohistochemical score 2+) cases , 2008, Modern Pathology.

[12]  I. Ellis,et al.  HER2 testing in the UK: further update to recommendations , 2008, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[13]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[14]  D. Visscher,et al.  Analysis of intratumoral heterogeneity and amplification status in breast carcinomas with equivocal (2+) HER-2 immunostaining. , 2005, American journal of clinical pathology.

[15]  T. Ivković-Kapicl,et al.  [Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer]. , 2010, Medicinski pregled.