A social interaction approach to managing the "invisibles" of virtual teams

This paper uses social interaction theory and Tuckman's team development model to report and interpret the findings of a case‐based research into the forming and performance of eight internationally situated virtual project teams operating in the information technology industry. Its objective is to highlight the need to bridge the “gap” between the structural and process orientations of management and virtual team members' situational perceptions and psychological drivers (the “invisibles”). For organizations contemplating the adoption of these new organizational forms, its findings will provide a holistic framework to guide their transformation from conventional to virtual teams. Some of the issues identified here are also likely to be salient to those who are already using virtual teams.

[1]  K. Bollen,et al.  Perceived Cohesion: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination , 1990 .

[2]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Computers, Networks and Work. , 1991 .

[3]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation. , 1996 .

[4]  William Caudill.  The Psychiatric Hospital as a Small Society , 1958 .

[5]  Laurie Putnam.  Distance teamwork: The realities of collaborating with virtual colleagues , 2001 .

[6]  William Foote Whyte,et al.  Street Corner Society , 1943 .

[7]  Abbe Mowshowitz,et al.  Virtual organization , 1997, CACM.

[8]  B. Tuckman.  DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Rob Kling,et al.  The Social Design of Worklife with Computers and Networks: A Natural Systems Perspective , 1994, Adv. Comput..

[10]  Sean B. Eom,et al.  Virtual teaming: a strategy for moving your organization into the new millennium , 2000, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[11]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[12]  L. Lee-Kelley,et al.  Breaking up is hard to do: the centrality of commitment in virtual organizations , 2002 .

[13]  Nitin Nohria,et al.  Face-to-Face: Making Network Organizations Work , 1992 .

[14]  Liz Lee-Kelley,et al.  Project leadership in clinical research organisations , 2000 .

[15]  Michael Quayle.  Project management in European Aerospace plc: a case study , 1999 .

[16]  David C. Yen,et al.  Groupware: a strategic analysis and implementation , 1999 .

[17]  Temple Burling,et al.  The Psychiatric Hospital as a Small Society. , 1959 .

[18]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms , 1986 .

[19]  Ton van der Smagt.  Enhancing virtual teams: social relations v. communication technology , 2000, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[20]  James H. Liu,et al.  Distance Matters: Physical Space and Social Impact , 1995 .

[21]  Tudor Rickards,et al.  Creative Leadership Processes in Project Team Development: An Alternative to Tuckman's Stage Model , 2000 .

[22]  Stuart Crainer,et al.  Key Management Ideas : Thinkers that Changed the Management World , 1996 .

[23]  Rafael Wittek,et al.  Mimetic trust and intra‐organizational network dynamics , 2001 .

[24]  Pamela R. Johnson,et al.  The “wonderland” of virtual teams , 2001 .

[25]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[26]  Darren Gergle,et al.  Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development , 2002, CHI.

[27]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[28]  R. Bales.  Interaction process analysis , 1976 .