Values in principals’ thinking when solving problems

The values that school principals use when solving organisational problems were studied. Data were collected by a think aloud procedure, in which the participants verbalised their thoughts while working on a set of five administrative problems. The results show that the principals referred to seven values that had subtle but important sub‐texts: confidentiality, nurturing, fairness, personal effectiveness, collaboration, consideration/care and mission. The findings were found to reinforce and extend themes in the recent literature on leadership, particularly with regard to school administrators’ cognition, the complexity perspective on administration, moral leadership and reflective practice.

[1]  Humberto R. Maturana,et al.  Cognitive Strategies , 2021, Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging.

[2]  Shana Goldwyn.  Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice , 2008 .

[3]  Angeliki Lazaridou,et al.  An Additional Way of Thinking About Organizational Life and Leadership: The Quantum Perspective , 2006 .

[4]  Michael Massotto.  The courage to lead. , 2005, Dentistry today.

[5]  Tyrone S. Pitsis,et al.  Managing and Organizations: An Introduction to Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[6]  John Riley,et al.  The charismatic leader , 2003 .

[7]  Morris B. Holbrook,et al.  Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking? , 2002 .

[8]  Patricia Shaw,et al.  Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking? , 2002 .

[9]  R. Elmore.  Hard Questions about Practice. , 2002 .

[10]  S. Nonis,et al.  Personal Value Profiles and Ethical Business Decisions , 2001 .

[11]  M. Copland.  The Myth of the Superprincipal , 2001 .

[12]  A. Harris,et al.  Challenging the orthodoxy of effective school leadership , 2001 .

[13]  M. Fullan.  Leading in a Culture of Change , 2001 .

[14]  B. Levin.  Democracy and Schools: Educating for Citizenship. , 2000 .

[15]  G. Sewell.  The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. , 1998 .

[16]  F. Haynes.  The ethical school , 1998 .

[17]  Maty Erina Driscoll.  Professionalism Versus Community: Themes from Recent School Reform Literature. , 1998 .

[18]  E. Goldman.  The Significance of Leadership Style. , 1998 .

[19]  Starita Smith.  School by School. , 1998 .

[20]  Cognitive Perspectives on Values in Administration: A Quest for Coherence and Relevance , 1996 .

[21]  Susan Moore Johnson,et al.  Leading to Change: The Challenge of the New Superintendency. Jossey-Bass Education Series. , 1996 .

[22]  Peter Afflerbach,et al.  Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading , 1996 .

[23]  A. Ornstein,et al.  Educational Administration: Concepts and Practices , 1995 .

[24]  Rosanne Steinbach,et al.  Expert Problem Solving: Evidence from School and District Leaders , 1994 .

[25]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Values and personality , 1994 .

[26]  J. Barker.  Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams , 1993 .

[27]  K. Leithwood,et al.  Superintendents' Group Problem-Solving Processes , 1993 .

[28]  M. Mumford,et al.  Leadership and destructive acts: Individual and situational influences , 1993 .

[29]  Christopher Hodgkinson,et al.  Educational Leadership: The Moral Art , 1993 .

[30]  Indicators of transformational leadership in the everyday problem solving of school administrators , 1991 .

[31]  E. Schein.  Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[32]  W. Guenter,et al.  Ethics in Teaching , 1990 .

[33]  D. Francis,et al.  Unblocking Organizational Values , 1989 .

[34]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[35]  R. Kail,et al.  CHAPTER 8 – Cognitive Strategies , 1982 .

[36]  Christopher Hodgkinson.  Towards A Philosophy Of Administration , 1979 .

[37]  R. Campbell.  Introduction to educational administration , 1971 .

[38]  J. B. Sears.  Ethics in School Administration , 1950 .