Mapping brand similarities: Comparing consumer online comments versus survey data

Online consumer behavior has become a valuable and viable source of consumer insights. Consumer comments in online forums, or discussion groups, have proven useful as a source to extract brand similarity data from. Apart from the cost and speed advantages, such data can be captured easily over different time periods. Both online consumer-generated data (CGD) and surveys have their pros and cons. To date, little is known as to how these two data sources compare in terms of brand insights. In this study, we discuss the results from analyzing survey and consumer-generated online data pertaining to the U.S. skincare market. Our study included 57 brands, and we used multidimensional scaling (MDS), t-stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE; an alternative to MDS), hierarchical clustering, and additive similarity trees (an extension of hierarchical clustering) to analyze the data. We show that the outcomes vary between CGD and surveys. As an additional insight, we show that, rather than the spatial scaling methods, additive trees result in a much better fit of brand similarity data in cases where we have many brands.

[1]  Michel Wedel,et al.  The effects of alternative methods of collecting similarity data for Multidimensional Scaling , 1995 .

[2]  J. Kruskal Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method , 1964 .

[3]  J. Leeuw,et al.  Simple and Canonical Correspondence Analysis Using the R Package anacor , 2007 .

[4]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Automated Marketing Research Using Online Customer Reviews , 2011 .

[5]  Lee G. Cooper A Review of Multidimensional Scaling in Marketing Research , 1983 .

[6]  S. C. Johnson Hierarchical clustering schemes , 1967, Psychometrika.

[7]  Patrick Mair,et al.  Goodness-of-Fit Assessment in Multidimensional Scaling and Unfolding , 2016, Multivariate behavioral research.

[8]  J. H. Ward Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[9]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Marketing Applications of MDS: Assessment and Outlook , 1975 .

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  Additive similarity trees , 1977 .

[11]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Data using t-SNE , 2008 .

[12]  Michael D. Johnson,et al.  On the Perceived Usefulness of Scaling Techniques in Market Analysis , 1996 .

[13]  P. Groenen,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling II , 2015 .

[14]  G. Hodgkinson,et al.  Mapping Consumers′ Cognitive Structures: A Comparison of Similarity Trees with Multidimensional Scaling and Cluster Analysis , 1991 .

[15]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Mine Your Own Business: Market-Structure Surveillance Through Text Mining , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[16]  Peter Doyle,et al.  Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a user's guide , 1973 .

[17]  P. Green Marketing Applications of MDS: Assessment and Outlook , 1975 .

[18]  Deborah F. Swayne,et al.  Data Visualization With Multidimensional Scaling , 2008 .

[19]  Tammo H. A. Bijmolt,et al.  Judgments of brand similarity , 1998 .

[20]  J. Kruskal Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis , 1964 .

[21]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  The effects of fatigue on judgments of interproduct similarity , 1990 .

[22]  Joon Yeon Choeh,et al.  Perceptual mapping based on web search queries and consumer forum comments , 2018 .

[23]  Laurens van der Maaten,et al.  Accelerating t-SNE using tree-based algorithms , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[24]  Patrick Mair,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling Using Majorization: SMACOF in R , 2008 .

[25]  Daniel M. Ringel,et al.  Visualizing Asymmetric Competition Among More Than 1, 000 Products Using Big Search Data , 2016, Mark. Sci..

[26]  Michel Wedel,et al.  A Comparison of Multidimensional Scaling Methods for Perceptual Mapping , 1999 .