Desynchronizing responses to correlated noise: A mechanism for binaural masking level differences at the inferior colliculus.

We examined the adequacy of decorrelation of the responses to dichotic noise as an explanation for the binaural masking level difference (BMLD). The responses of 48 low-frequency neurons in the inferior colliculus of anesthetized guinea pigs were recorded to binaurally presented noise with various degrees of interaural correlation and to interaurally correlated noise in the presence of 500-Hz tones in either zero or pi interaural phase. In response to fully correlated noise, neurons' responses were modulated with interaural delay, showing quasiperiodic noise delay functions (NDFs) with a central peak and side peaks, separated by intervals roughly equivalent to the period of the neuron's best frequency. For noise with zero interaural correlation (independent noises presented to each ear), neurons were insensitive to the interaural delay. Their NDFs were unmodulated, with the majority showing a level of activity approximately equal to the mean of the peaks and troughs of the NDF obtained with fully correlated noise. Partial decorrelation of the noise resulted in NDFs that were, in general, intermediate between the fully correlated and fully decorrelated noise. Presenting 500-Hz tones simultaneously with fully correlated noise also had the effect of demodulating the NDFs. In the case of tones with zero interaural phase, this demodulation appeared to be a saturation process, raising the discharge at all noise delays to that at the largest peak in the NDF. In the majority of neurons, presenting the tones in pi phase had a similar effect on the NDFs to decorrelating the noise; the response was demodulated toward the mean of the peaks and troughs of the NDF. Thus the effect of added tones on the responses of delay-sensitive inferior colliculus neurons to noise could be accounted for by a desynchronizing effect. This result is entirely consistent with cross-correlation models of the BMLD. However, in some neurons, the effects of an added tone on the NDF appeared more extreme than the effect of decorrelating the noise, suggesting the possibility of additional inhibitory influences.

[1]  Bruce H. Deatherage,et al.  The Masking of Tones by White Noise as a Function of the Interaural Phases of Both Components. I. 500 Cycles , 1952 .

[2]  L H Carney,et al.  Effects of interaural time delays of noise stimuli on low-frequency cells in the cat's inferior colliculus. III. Evidence for cross-correlation. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  T. Yin,et al.  Effects of interaural time delays of noise stimuli on low-frequency cells in the cat's inferior colliculus. I. Responses to wideband noise. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  M. W. Spitzer,et al.  Neurons sensitive to interaural phase disparity in gerbil superior olive: diverse monaural and temporal response properties. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  R. Batra,et al.  Interaural phase-sensitive units in the inferior colliculus of the unanesthetized rabbit: effects of changing frequency. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Ag Armin Kohlrausch,et al.  Analytical expressions for the envelope correlation of certain narrow‐band stimuli , 1995 .

[7]  H Steven Colburn,et al.  Coincidence model of MSO responses , 1990, Hearing Research.

[8]  Bruce H. Deatherage,et al.  Effect of Interaural Correlation on the Precision of Centering a Noise , 1962 .

[9]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Differences of interaural phase and level in detection and lateralization: 250 Hz. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  S Kuwada,et al.  Binaural interaction in low-frequency neurons in inferior colliculus of the cat. IV. Comparison of monaural and binaural response properties. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  J. C. R. Licklider,et al.  The Influence of Interaural Phase Relations upon the Masking of Speech by White Noise , 1948 .

[12]  D. McAlpine,et al.  Convergent Input from Brainstem Coincidence Detectors onto Delay-Sensitive Neurons in the Inferior Colliculus , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  D. Asdourian,et al.  Effects of thalamic and limbic system lesions on self-stimulation. , 1966, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[14]  A Rees,et al.  Interaural delay sensitivity to tones and broad band signals in the guinea-pig inferior colliculus , 1990, Hearing Research.

[15]  David McAlpine,et al.  Detectability Index Measures of Binaural Masking Level Difference Across Populations of Inferior Colliculus Neurons , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  D. McAlpine,et al.  Interaural delay sensitivity and the classification of low best-frequency binaural responses in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig , 1996, Hearing Research.

[17]  M. Konishi,et al.  Tolerance to Sound Intensity of Binaural Coincidence Detection in the Nucleus Laminaris of the Owl , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  I. Winter,et al.  The representation of steady-state vowel sounds in the temporal discharge patterns of the guinea pig cochlear nerve and primarylike cochlear nucleus neurons. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  L A JEFFRESS,et al.  A place theory of sound localization. , 1948, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[20]  L. Carney,et al.  A model for binaural response properties of inferior colliculus neurons. I. A model with interaural time difference-sensitive excitatory and inhibitory inputs. , 1998, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  S Kuwada,et al.  Binaural interaction in low-frequency neurons in inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Effects of long interaural delays, intensity, and repetition rate on interaural delay function. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  H. Steven Colburn,et al.  Point-neuron model for binaural interaction in MSO , 1993, Hearing Research.

[23]  D. McAlpine,et al.  Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level difference stimuli measured by rate-versus-level functions. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Masking of Tonal Signals , 1956 .

[25]  T. Yin,et al.  Binaural interaction in low-frequency neurons in inferior colliculus of the cat. III. Effects of changing frequency. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  The Masking of Tones by White Noise as a Function of the Interaural Phases of Both Components , 1952 .

[27]  N. Durlach,et al.  Interaural correlation discrimination: II. Relation to binaural unmasking. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  I. Hirsh The Influence of Interaural Phase on Interaural Summation and Inhibition , 1948 .

[29]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Differences of Interaural Phase and Level in Detection and Lateralization: 250 Hz , 1971 .

[30]  S Kuwada,et al.  Response of cat inferior colliculus neurons to binaural beat stimuli: possible mechanisms for sound localization. , 1979, Science.

[31]  T. Yin,et al.  Interaural time sensitivity in medial superior olive of cat. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  H S Colburn,et al.  Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. II. Detection of tones in noise. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  T. Yin,et al.  Binaural interaction in low-frequency neurons in inferior colliculus of the cat. II. Effects of changing rate and direction of interaural phase. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  M. P. Friedman,et al.  HANDBOOK OF PERCEPTION , 1977 .

[36]  F. A. Webster,et al.  The Influence of Interaural Phase on Masked Thresholds I. The Role of Interaural Time‐Deviation , 1951 .

[37]  Interaural attenuation versus frequency for guinea pig and chinchilla CM response. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.