Relational Cohesion Model of Organizational Commitment

Excerpt] This chapter reviews the research program of relational cohesion theory (RCT) (Lawler & Yoon, 1993, 1996, 1998; Lawler et al., 2000; Thye et al., 2002) and uses it to develop a model of organizational commitment. Broadly, relational cohesion theory (RCT) has attempted to understand conditions and processes that promote an expressive relation in social exchange; an expressive relation is indicated by relational cohesion, that is, the degree to which exchange partners perceive their relationship as a unifying object having its own value. The research program argues that such relational cohesion is a proximal cause of various forms of behavioral commitment in a group setting, for example stay behavior, gift-giving and investment. In this chapter, we develop a model of organizational commitment through the following three steps: First, we review the program of relational cohesion theory (RCT) and establish the key theoretical concepts and theorems through which it explains how instrumentally motivated actors in exchange relations develop an expressive relation. Second, we apply the concepts and theorems to derive a ‘relational-cohesion model’ of organizational commitment. Third, we examine the heuristic value of the new model by deriving predictions with respect to several organizational phenomena to which conventional organizational commitment theories may not have paid sufficient attention. The role of emotions is highlighted and our purpose is to theorize the interrelationships of instrumental, affective and normative forms of organizational commitment.

[1]  J. Knote.  Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community , 2004 .

[2]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[3]  S. Nadkarni.  Instructional Methods and Mental Models of Students: An Empirical Investigation , 2003 .

[4]  Edward J. Lawler,et al.  The theory of relational cohesion: Review of a research program research program , 2002 .

[5]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment to organizational change: extension of a three-component model. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  J. C. Wofford,et al.  Measuring motive imagery contained in the vision statement , 2002 .

[8]  Edward J. Lawler,et al.  Micro social orders , 2002 .

[9]  A. Brief,et al.  Organizational behavior: affect in the workplace. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  Shane R. Thye,et al.  A Dual Process Model of Organizational Commitment , 2002 .

[11]  Jeongkoo Yoon.  The role of structure and motivation for workplace empowerment : The case of Korean employees , 2001 .

[12]  Shane R. Thye,et al.  Emotion and Group Cohesion in Productive Exchange1 , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research , 2000 .

[14]  Shane R. Thye,et al.  Supervisor Support in the Work Place: Legitimacy and Positive Affectivity , 2000, The Journal of social psychology.

[15]  J. Onyx,et al.  Measuring Social Capital in Five Communities , 2000 .

[16]  Jeongkoo Yoon,et al.  Organizational Support in the Workplace: The Case of Korean Hospital Employees , 1999 .

[17]  John M. Martz,et al.  The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size , 1998 .

[18]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Toward a Unifying Framework for Exploring Fit and Flexibility in Strategic Human Resource Management , 1998 .

[19]  A. Portes.  Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[20]  L. Porter,et al.  Alternative Approaches to the Employee-Organization Relationship: Does Investment in Employees Pay Off? , 1997 .

[21]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: A REVIEW AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 1997 .

[22]  D. Organ.  Organizational Citizenship Behavior: It's Construct Clean-Up Time , 1997 .

[23]  John E. Delery,et al.  Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions , 1996 .

[24]  Jeongkoo Yoon,et al.  Sense of Control Among Hospital Employees: An Assessment of Choice Process, Empowerment, and Buffering Hypotheses1 , 1996 .

[25]  John Skvoretz,et al.  Who Exchanges with Whom: Structural Determinants of Exchange Frequency in Negotiated Exchange Networks , 1995 .

[26]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[27]  Laurie Larwood,et al.  Structure And Meaning Of Organizational Vision , 1995 .

[28]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  Psychological contracts in organizations , 1995 .

[29]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[30]  P. Kollock.  The Emergence of Exchange Structures: An Experimental Study of Uncertainty, Commitment, and Trust , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  Richard H. Franke,et al.  Competitive Advantage Through People: Unleashing the Power of the Work Force , 1994 .

[32]  M. R. Baker,et al.  Interpersonal Attachment and Organizational Commitment: Subgroup Hypothesis Revisited , 1994 .

[33]  Peter Kollock,et al.  "An Eye for an Eye Leaves Everyone Blind": Cooperation and Accounting Systems , 1993 .

[34]  Caryl E. Rusbult,et al.  Commitment Processes in Close Relationships: An Interdependence Analysis , 1993 .

[35]  R. Frank,et al.  The Strategic Role of the Emotions , 1993 .

[36]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  Social identity, distinctiveness, and in-group homogeneity. , 1993 .

[37]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness: From Attraction to Social Identity , 1992 .

[38]  J. Mathieu.  A cross-level nonrecursive model of the antecedents of organizational commitment and satisfaction. , 1991 .

[39]  J. G. Carlson,et al.  Psychology of Emotion , 1991 .

[40]  K. Bollen,et al.  Perceived Cohesion: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination , 1990 .

[41]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[42]  J. Rentsch.  Climate and culture : interaction and qualitative differences in organizational meanings , 1990 .

[43]  R. Frank.  Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions , 1990 .

[44]  K. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation , 1990 .

[45]  L. James,et al.  Integrating Work Environment Perceptions: Explorations into the Measurement of Meaning , 1989 .

[46]  Jennifer A. Chatman.  Improving Interactional Organizational Research: A Model of Person-Organization Fit , 1989 .

[47]  Y. Wiener,et al.  Forms of Value Systems: Focus on Organizational Effectiveness and Cultural Change and Maintenance , 1988 .

[48]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice , 1988 .

[49]  M. Lamont,et al.  CULTURAL CAPITAL: ALLUSIONS, GAPS AND GLISSANDOS IN RECENT THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENTS* , 1988 .

[50]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[51]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. , 1986 .

[52]  Larry J. Williams,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods. , 1986 .

[53]  Ann Swidler.  CULTURE IN ACTION: SYMBOLS AND STRATEGIES* , 1986 .

[54]  George M. Thomas,et al.  Legitimation, Endorsement, and Stability , 1986 .

[55]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[56]  D. Watson,et al.  Toward a consensual structure of mood. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[57]  David E. Kieras,et al.  The Role of a Mental Model in Learning to Operate a Device. , 1984 .

[58]  C. Rusbult.  American Psychological Association, Inc. A Longitudinal Test of the Investment Model: The Development (and Deterioration) of Satisfaction and Commitment in Heterosexual Involvements , 2022 .

[59]  C. Hardy.  Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems , 1983 .

[60]  Y. Wiener.  Commitment in Organizations: A Normative View , 1982 .

[61]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  The commitment and job tenure of new employees: Some evidence of postdecisional justification. , 1981 .

[62]  O. Williamson.  The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[63]  R. Collins.  On the Microfoundations of Macrosociology , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[64]  C. Rusbult.  Commitment and Satisfaction in Romantic Associations: A Test of the investment Model , 1980 .

[65]  K. Cook,et al.  Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks , 1978 .

[66]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[67]  P. Blau.  A Macrosociological Theory of Social Structure , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[68]  B. Schneider.  Organizational Climates: An Essay. , 1975 .

[69]  Bruce Buchanan.  BUILDING ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT: THE SOCIALIZATION OF MANAGERS IN WORK ORGANIZATIONS , 1974 .

[70]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. , 1974 .

[71]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[72]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[73]  R. Kanter.  COMMITMENT AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION: A STUDY OF COMMITMENT MECHANISMS IN UTOPIAN COMMUNITIES * , 1968 .

[74]  H. Becker.  Notes on the Concept of Commitment , 1960, American Journal of Sociology.

[75]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[76]  E P HOLLANDER,et al.  Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. , 1958, Psychological review.

[77]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[78]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environment , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[79]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  Psychological contracts in employment : Cross-national perspectives , 2000 .

[80]  M. R. Baker,et al.  Mutual Dependence and Gift Giving in Exchange Relations , 1995 .

[81]  L. Henderson.  On the Social System , 1993 .

[82]  R. Larsen,et al.  Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. , 1992 .

[83]  Peter M. Senge,et al.  Laws of the Fifth Discipline , 1990 .

[84]  C. Tilly.  Principles of Group Solidarity.Michael Hecter , 1989 .

[85]  E. Lawler.  High-Involvement Management , 1986 .

[86]  M. Hogg,et al.  Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation , 1985 .

[87]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. , 1982 .

[88]  R. Kanungo.  The concepts of alienation and involvement revisited. , 1979 .

[89]  Melvin J. Kimmel,et al.  Twenty Years of Experimental Gaming: Critique,Synthesis, and Suggestions for the Future , 1977 .

[90]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[91]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2022 .