Inter‐organizational knowledge management in complex products and systems

– The vast majority of evidence about knowledge management (KM) is based on studies within a mass‐producing context and at intra‐organizational level. Little has been reported in the complex products and systems (CoPS) literature about KM processes across firm boundaries. To contribute to this gap, this paper reviews the literature of CoPS, inter‐organizational collaboration and KM, discusses some challenges of inter‐organization KM faced by CoPS manufacturers, and explores a research framework which is helpful to provide a preliminary understanding of inter‐organizational KM within a CoPS context., – Literature review and research experience are presented., – The study has identified some challenges faced by CoPS manufacturers when they try to manage knowledge from an innovative network, and developed a framework extending KM processes into an inter‐firm collaborative network for CoPS development. Both, project level collaboration and firm level linkages need to be taken into consideration when attempting to implement KM at inter‐organizational level. Knowledge acquisition from network, knowledge integration, and knowledge sharing in the network are the main inter‐organizational KM activities in a CoPS context., – As KM based on inter‐organizational collaboration has received little attention in prior studies, especially in CoPS conditions, this study is an exploratory discussion of KM issues within a CoPS context, combining the cross‐school theories of inter‐organizational linkages, KM and CoPS innovation. This paper tries to account for knowledge‐related activities involved in CoPS development, identifying some challenges in CoPS innovation.

[1]  P. Quintas,et al.  Knowledge management: A strategic agenda , 1997 .

[2]  Kulwant Singh,et al.  The Impact of Technological Complexity and Interfirm Cooperation on Business Survival , 1997 .

[3]  Michael Hobday,et al.  Technology management in complex product systems (CoPS) - ten questions answered , 1999 .

[4]  D. Gann,et al.  Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems , 2000 .

[5]  Gary Lynn,et al.  Knowledge Management in New Product Teams: Practices and Outcomes , 2000 .

[6]  T. Das,et al.  Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances , 1998 .

[7]  P. Franses,et al.  Vertical Marketing Systems for Complex Products: A Triadic Perspective , 2004 .

[8]  S. Carlsson Knowledge managing and knowledge management systems in inter-organizational networks , 2003 .

[9]  E. Autio,et al.  SOCIAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION, AND KNOWLEDGE EXPLOITATION IN YOUNG TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS , 2001 .

[10]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Managing across Borders , 2003 .

[11]  Michael Hobday,et al.  Innovation in complex products and system , 2000 .

[12]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  When shakeout doesn't occur: The evolution of the turboprop engine industry , 2000 .

[13]  S. Collinson Knowledge management capabilities in R&D: a UK‐‐Japan company comparison , 2001 .

[14]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[15]  R. McAdam Knowledge Management as a Catalyst for Innovation within Organizations: A Qualitative Study , 2000 .

[16]  Tim Brady,et al.  Knowledge management and the politics of knowledge: illustrations from complex products and systems , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Kamal Munir,et al.  Systems of organizational sensemaking for sustained product innovation , 2000 .

[18]  H. Scarbrough Knowledge management, HRM and the innovation process , 2003 .

[19]  M. Dulaimi,et al.  Organizational motivation and inter-organizational interaction in construction innovation in Singapore , 2003 .

[20]  M. Hobday The Project-Based Organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems? , 2000 .

[21]  F. Mavondo,et al.  The effect of relationship dimensions on interpersonal and interorganizational commitment in organizations conducting business between Australia and China , 2001 .

[22]  C. Oliver Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions , 1990 .

[23]  Maurizio Sobrero,et al.  Strategic Management of Supplier-Manufacturer Relations in New Product Development , 2002 .

[24]  Terje I. Vaaland,et al.  Exploring interorganizational conflict in complex projects , 2003 .

[25]  P. Drucker Post-Capitalist Society , 1993 .

[26]  Cesar Augusto Tacla,et al.  Agent-supported portals and knowledge management in complex R&D projects , 2001, Comput. Ind..

[27]  Li Li,et al.  The effects of trust and shared vision on inward knowledge transfer in subsidiaries' intra- and inter-organizational relationships , 2005 .

[28]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[29]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[30]  Pierpaolo Andriani,et al.  Managing Knowledge for Innovation , 2002 .

[31]  Jerald Hage,et al.  Industry-Public Knowledge Infrastructure Interaction: Intra- and Inter-organizational Explanations of Interactive Learning , 2004 .

[32]  Alberto Carneiro,et al.  How does knowledge management influence innovation and competitiveness? , 2000, J. Knowl. Manag..

[33]  Trevor Williams,et al.  Cooperation by design: structure and cooperation in interorganizational networks , 2005 .

[34]  Jie Yang,et al.  Knowledge integration and innovation: Securing new product advantage in high technology industry , 2005 .

[35]  Sue Newell,et al.  Component sharing in complex products and systems: challenges, solutions, and practical implications , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.