The Compatibility of Durable Goods with Contingent Generic Consumables

Many durable products provide value only when used together with contingent services or consumable components, e.g. light fixtures (bulbs), printers (ink), electronics (batteries). Consumers need only have access to the contingent consumable components to continue to derive service from a durable. In fact, many firms rely primarily upon the revenues generated from the contingent services or consumables as the primary source of profitability, e.g. giving away the razors to make money on the blades. Such firms often invest considerable effort into making sure that consumers of their durables are held captive to their own branded consumables by impeding their access to generically available consumables. They do so by designing their products in such a way that they are not readily compatible with the generic consumables. We consider the implications of competition from third-party manufacturers that can provide generic consumables and the manufacturer’s production decisions of a durable good under such contingencies. This allows us to draw managerial insights about how a firm should decide on his product compatibility and production quantity when the generic contingent consumables enter the market.

[1]  Preyas S. Desai,et al.  Competition in Durable Goods Markets: The Strategic Consequences of Leasing and Selling , 1999 .

[2]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[3]  Preyas S. Desai Leasing and Selling: Optimal Marketing Strategies for a Durable Goods Firm (Лизинг и продажи: оптимальные маркетинговые стратегии для изготовителя товаров длительного пользования) , 1998 .

[4]  P. Regibeau,et al.  Mix and Match: Product Compatibility Without Network Externalities , 2011 .

[5]  Martin Charter,et al.  Remanufacturing and product design , 2008 .

[6]  E. Maskin,et al.  A Theory of Dynamic Oligopoly, II: Price Competition , 1985 .

[7]  Kyle D. Cattani,et al.  Seeking Closure: Competition in Complementary Markets , 2009, Decis. Sci..

[8]  H. Groenevelt,et al.  COMPETITION IN REMANUFACTURING , 2001 .

[9]  Necati Aras,et al.  Optimal Prices and Trade-in Rebates for Durable, Remanufacturable Products , 2005, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[10]  Ruud H. Teunter,et al.  Matching Demand and Supply to Maximize Profits from Remanufacturing , 2003, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[11]  Carol Prahinski,et al.  Empirical research opportunities in reverse supply chains , 2006 .

[12]  Serguei Netessine,et al.  Performance Contracting in After-Sales Service Supply Chains , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Itai Ashlagi,et al.  Mix and match , 2010, EC '10.

[14]  S. Huang,et al.  A Theory of Finitely Durable Goods Monopoly with Used-Goods Market and Transaction Costs , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Mark E. Ferguson,et al.  The Effect of Competition on Recovery Strategies , 2006 .

[16]  V. Daniel R. Guide,et al.  The Potential for Cannibalization of New Products Sales by Remanufactured Products , 2010, Decis. Sci..

[17]  Neil Gandal,et al.  Systems Competition, Vertical Merger, and Foreclosure , 2000 .

[18]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Desirability of Compatibility in the Absence of Network Externalities , 1989 .

[19]  Ramanath Subramanyam,et al.  Key Drivers in the Market for Remanufactured Products: Empirical Evidence from eBay , 2008 .

[20]  Abe Zeid,et al.  Pricing decisions in a multi-criteria setting for product recovery facilities , 2011 .

[21]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[22]  Bowon Kim,et al.  Optimal pricing, EOL (end of life) warranty, and spare parts manufacturing strategy amid product transition , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Stephen M. Gilbert,et al.  Durable Products, Time Inconsistency, and Lock-in , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Managing New and Remanufactured Products , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Lifecycle Pricing for Installed Base Management with Constrained Capacity and Remanufacturing , 2012 .

[26]  Stephen M. Gilbert,et al.  Selling and Leasing Strategies for Durable Goods with Complementary Products , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[27]  L. B. Toktay,et al.  Joint Life‐Cycle Dynamics of New and Remanufactured Products , 2006 .

[28]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Remanufacturing as a Marketing Strategy , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Seungjin Whang,et al.  Competing in Product and Service: A Product Life-Cycle Model , 1997 .

[30]  Trisha D. Anderson,et al.  The closed-loop supply chain network with competition, distribution channel investment, and uncertainties , 2013 .

[31]  L. Beril Toktay,et al.  Market Segmentation and Product Technology Selection for Remanufacturable Products , 2005, Manag. Sci..