Safety Science has been developed over time with notable models in the early 20th Century such as Heinrich’s iceberg model and the Swiss cheese model. Common techniques such fault tree and event tree analyses, HAZOP analysis and bow-ties construction are widely used within industry. These techniques are based on the concept that failures of a system can be caused by deviations or individual faults within a system, combinations of latent failures, or even where each part of a complex system is operating within normal bounds but a combined effect creates a hazardous situation.
In this era of Big Data, systems are becoming increasingly complex, producing such a large quantity of data related to safety that cannot be meaningfully analysed by humans to make decisions or uncover complex trends that may indicate the presence of hazards. More subtle and automated techniques for mining these data are required to provide a better understanding of our systems and the environment within which they operate, and insights to hazards that may not otherwise be identified. Big Data Risk Analysis (BDRA) is a suite of techniques being researched to identify the use of non-traditional techniques from big data sources to predict safety risk.
This paper describes early trials of BDRA that have been conducted on railway signal information and text-based reports of railway safety near misses and the ongoing research that is looking at combining various data sources to uncover obscured trends that cannot be identified by considering each source individually. The paper also discusses how visual analytics may be a key tool in analysing Big Data to support knowledge elicitation and decision-making, as well as providing information in a form that can be readily interpreted by a variety of audiences.
[1]
Maria Grazia Gnoni,et al.
“Lean occupational” safety: An application for a Near-miss Management System design
,
2013
.
[2]
Robert Dale,et al.
Handbook of Natural Language Processing
,
2001,
Computational Linguistics.
[3]
Zhongzhi Shi.
Logic Foundation of Artificial Intelligence
,
2011
.
[4]
Kathleen Dahlgren,et al.
A linguistic ontology
,
1995,
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[5]
Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.
Fast unfolding of community hierarchies in large networks
,
2008,
ArXiv.
[6]
Dmitry Paranyushkin,et al.
Identifying the Pathways for Meaning Circulation using Text Network Analysis
,
2011
.
[7]
Chris Harrison,et al.
Big Data Risk Analysis for rail safety
,
2015
.
[8]
Miguel Figueres-Esteban,et al.
The role of data visualization in Railway Big Data Risk Analysis
,
2015
.
[9]
Barbara J. Grosz,et al.
Natural-Language Processing
,
1982,
Artificial Intelligence.
[10]
Miguel Figueres-Esteban,et al.
Learning from text-based close call data
,
2016
.
[11]
Lucila Ohno-Machado,et al.
Natural language processing: an introduction
,
2011,
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..
[12]
Nicola Guarino.
UNDERSTANDING, BUILDING, AND USING ONTOLOGIES
,
1997
.
[13]
N. F. Noy,et al.
Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology
,
2001
.