Graded Neuronal Modulations Related to Visual Spatial Attention

Studies of visual attention in monkeys typically measure neuronal activity when the stimulus event to be detected occurs at a cued location versus when it occurs at an uncued location. But this approach does not address how neuronal activity changes relative to conditions where attention is unconstrained by cueing. Human psychophysical studies have used neutral cueing conditions and found that neutrally cued behavioral performance is generally intermediate to that of cued and uncued conditions (Posner et al., 1978; Mangun and Hillyard, 1990; Montagna et al., 2009). To determine whether the neuronal correlates of visual attention during neutral cueing are similarly intermediate, we trained macaque monkeys to detect changes in stimulus orientation that were more likely to occur at one location (cued) than another (uncued), or were equally likely to occur at either stimulus location (neutral). Consistent with human studies, performance was best when the location was cued, intermediate when both locations were neutrally cued, and worst when the location was uncued. Neuronal modulations in visual area V4 were also graded as a function of cue validity and behavioral performance. By recording from both hemispheres simultaneously, we investigated the possibility of switching attention between stimulus locations during neutral cueing. The results failed to support a unitary “spotlight” of attention. Overall, our findings indicate that attention-related changes in V4 are graded to accommodate task demands. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Studies of the neuronal correlates of attention in monkeys typically use visual cues to manipulate where attention is focused (“cued” vs “uncued”). Human psychophysical studies often also include neutrally cued trials to study how attention naturally varies between points of interest. But the neuronal correlates of this neutral condition are unclear. We measured behavioral performance and neuronal activity in cued, uncued, and neutrally cued blocks of trials. Behavioral performance and neuronal responses during neutral cueing were intermediate to those of the cued and uncued conditions. We found no signatures of a single mechanism of attention that switches between stimulus locations. Thus, attention-related changes in neuronal activity are largely hemisphere-specific and graded according to task demands.

[1]  William C. Ogden,et al.  Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location , 2014 .

[2]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[5]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[7]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[8]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  G. Sperling,et al.  Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. , 1987, Science.

[10]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. , 1988, Science.

[12]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Allocation of visual attention to spatial locations: Tradeoff functions for event-related brain potentials and detection performance , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  U. Castiello,et al.  Splitting focal attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  G. Mangun,et al.  Electrophysiological and behavioral "costs" and "benefits" during sustained visual-spatial attention. , 1994, The International journal of neuroscience.

[15]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Responses in area V4 depend on the spatial relationship between stimulus and attention. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  George R. Mangun,et al.  Sustained visual-spatial attention produces costs and benefits in response time and evoked neural activity , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  R. Klein,et al.  Splitting versus sharing focal attention: comment on Castiello and Umiltà (1992). , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Carrie J. McAdams,et al.  Effects of Attention on Orientation-Tuning Functions of Single Neurons in Macaque Cortical Area V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  D. Somers,et al.  Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  J. Maunsell,et al.  The role of attention in visual processing. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[21]  D. Somers,et al.  Multiple Spotlights of Attentional Selection in Human Visual Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[22]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Independent Resources for Attentional Tracking in the Left and Right Visual Hemifields , 2005, Psychological science.

[23]  M. A. Smith,et al.  Stimulus Dependence of Neuronal Correlation in Primary Visual Cortex of the Macaque , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  The speed of visual attention: what time is it? , 2006, Journal of vision.

[25]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The blinking spotlight of attention , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Sustained division of spatial attention to multiple locations within one hemifield , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[27]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Jude F. Mitchell,et al.  Spatial Attention Decorrelates Intrinsic Activity Fluctuations in Macaque Area V4 , 2009, Neuron.

[29]  E. Miller,et al.  Serial, Covert Shifts of Attention during Visual Search Are Reflected by the Frontal Eye Fields and Correlated with Population Oscillations , 2009, Neuron.

[30]  M. Carrasco,et al.  On the automaticity and flexibility of covert attention: a speed-accuracy trade-off analysis. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[31]  J. Assad,et al.  Neural Activity in the Middle Temporal Area and Lateral Intraparietal Area during Endogenously Cued Shifts of Attention , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Jeffrey B. Nyquist,et al.  Spatial and temporal limits of motion perception across variations in speed, eccentricity, and low vision. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[33]  Michael A. Cohen,et al.  The speed of free will , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention trades off spatial acuity , 2009, Vision Research.

[35]  Kazumichi Matsumiya,et al.  Motion mechanisms with different spatiotemporal characteristics identified by an MAE technique with superimposed gratings. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[36]  Andrew M. Clark,et al.  Stimulus onset quenches neural variability: a widespread cortical phenomenon , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  R. VanRullen,et al.  Spontaneous EEG oscillations reveal periodic sampling of visual attention , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  K. Cave,et al.  Split attention as part of a flexible attentional system for complex scenes: comment on Jans, Peters, and De Weerd (2010). , 2010, Psychological review.

[39]  P. De Weerd,et al.  Visual spatial attention to multiple locations at once: the jury is still out. , 2010, Psychological review.

[40]  J. Maunsell,et al.  A Neuronal Population Measure of Attention Predicts Behavioral Performance on Individual Trials , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Carrasco Visual attention: The past 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[42]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Multifocal Attention Filters Targets from Distracters within and beyond Primate MT Neurons' Receptive Field Boundaries , 2011, Neuron.

[44]  P. Fries,et al.  Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmically , 2012, Current Biology.

[45]  Y. Saalmann,et al.  Rhythmic Sampling within and between Objects despite Sustained Attention at a Cued Location , 2013, Current Biology.

[46]  J. Serences,et al.  Temporal dynamics of divided spatial attention. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  R. VanRullen Visual Attention: A Rhythmic Process? , 2013, Current Biology.

[48]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  A Soft Handoff of Attention between Cerebral Hemispheres , 2014, Current Biology.

[49]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Within-Hemifield Competition in Early Visual Areas Limits the Ability to Track Multiple Objects with Attention , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  Correlated variability in population activity: noise or signature of internal computations? , 2015 .

[51]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  A Refined Neuronal Population Measure of Visual Attention , 2015, PloS one.

[52]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Neuronal Mechanisms of Visual Attention. , 2015, Annual review of vision science.

[53]  Thomas Zhihao Luo,et al.  Neuronal Modulations in Visual Cortex Are Associated with Only One of Multiple Components of Attention , 2015, Neuron.

[54]  C Daniel Salzman,et al.  Reward expectation differentially modulates attentional behavior and activity in visual area V4 , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.