Basic concepts in RNA virus evolution

A hallmark of RNA genomes is the error‐prone nature of their Replication and retro‐ transcription. The major biochemical basis of the limited replication fidelity is the absence of proof‐ reading/repair and postreplicative error correction mechanisms that normally operate during replication of cellular DNA. In spite of this unique feature of RNA replicons, the dynamics of viral populations seems to follow the same basic principles that classical population genetics has established for higher organisms. Here we review recent evidence of the profound effects that genetic bottlenecks have in enhancing the deleterious effects of Muller's ratchet during RNA virus evolution. The validity of the Red Queen hypothesis and of the competitive exclusion principle for RNA viruses are viewed as the expected result of the highly variable and adaptable nature of viral quasispecies. Viral fitness, or ability to replicate infectious progeny, can vary a million‐fold within short time intervals. Paradoxically, functional and structural studies suggest extreme limitations to virus variation. Adaptability of RNA viruses appears to be based on the occupation of very narrow portions of sequence space at any given time.—Domingo, E., Escarmís, E., Sevilla, N., Moya, A., Elena, S. F., Quer, J., Novella, I. S., and Holland, J. J. Basic concepts in RNA virus evolution. FASEB J. 10, 859‐864 (1996)

[1]  David A. Steinhauer,et al.  Mutation Frequencies at Defined Single Codon Sites in Vesicular Stomatitis Virus and Poliovirus Can Be Increased Only Slightly by Chemical Mutagenesis , 1990, Journal of virology.

[2]  S. Elena,et al.  Size of genetic bottlenecks leading to virus fitness loss is determined by mean initial population fitness , 1995, Journal of virology.

[3]  John C. Avise,et al.  Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution , 1993, Springer US.

[4]  R. Cheynier,et al.  Nonhomogeneous distribution of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 proviruses in the spleen , 1992, Journal of virology.

[5]  F. García-Arenal,et al.  Molecular Basis of Virus Evolution: Population genetics of viruses: an introduction , 1995 .

[6]  John C. Avise.  Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution , 1994, Springer US.

[7]  A. Moya,et al.  Fitness alteration of foot-and-mouth disease virus mutants: measurement of adaptability of viral quasispecies , 1991, Journal of virology.

[8]  S. Elena,et al.  Evolution of fitness in experimental populations of vesicular stomatitis virus. , 1996, Genetics.

[9]  J. Holland,et al.  Extreme heterogeneity in populations of vesicular stomatitis virus , 1989, Journal of virology.

[10]  Is antigenic variation of HIV important for AIDS and what might be expected in the future , 1994 .

[11]  Charles Weissmann,et al.  Nucleotide sequence heterogeneity of an RNA phage population , 1978, Cell.

[12]  Lin Chao,et al.  Fitness of RNA virus decreased by Muller's ratchet , 1990, Nature.

[13]  A. Meyerhans,et al.  Selection, recombination, and G----A hypermutation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genomes , 1991, Journal of virology.

[14]  H. Muller.  THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE. , 1964, Mutation research.

[15]  S. Elena,et al.  The red queen reigns in the kingdom of RNA viruses. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  F J Ayala,et al.  Competition between Species: Frequency Dependence , 1971, Science.

[17]  Miguel Ángel Martínez,et al.  Antigenic heterogeneity of a foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype in the field is mediated by very limited sequence variation at several antigenic sites , 1994, Journal of virology.

[18]  A. Moya,et al.  Rapid fitness losses in mammalian RNA virus clones due to Muller's ratchet. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  S. Elena,et al.  Extreme fitness differences in mammalian and insect hosts after continuous replication of vesicular stomatitis virus in sandfly cells , 1995, Journal of virology.

[20]  Roberto Cattaneo,et al.  Biased hypermutation and other genetic changes in defective measles viruses in human brain infections , 1988, Cell.

[21]  J. Gillespie.  The causes of molecular evolution , 1991 .

[22]  H. Buc,et al.  E. coli DNA polymerase I as a reverse transcriptase. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[23]  S. Wright,et al.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations. , 1931, Genetics.

[24]  E. Domingo,et al.  Distinct repertoire of antigenic variants of foot-and-mouth disease virus in the presence or absence of immune selection , 1993, Journal of virology.

[25]  V. Pathak,et al.  5-Azacytidine and RNA secondary structure increase the retrovirus mutation rate , 1992, Journal of virology.

[26]  E. Wimmer,et al.  Genetics of poliovirus. , 1993, Annual review of genetics.

[27]  A. Gibbs,et al.  Plant viruses: master explorers of evolutionary space. , 1993, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[28]  R. Lande.  RISK OF POPULATION EXTINCTION FROM FIXATION OF NEW DELETERIOUS MUTATIONS , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  E. Domingo,et al.  Complications of RNA heterogeneity for the engineering of virus vaccines and antiviral agents. , 1992, Genetic engineering.

[30]  P. Karran,et al.  DNA mismatch binding defects, DNA damage tolerance, and mutator phenotypes in human colorectal carcinoma cell lines. , 1995, Cancer research.

[31]  S. Elena,et al.  Subclonal components of consensus fitness in an RNA virus clone , 1994, Journal of virology.

[32]  S. Elena,et al.  Exponential increases of RNA virus fitness during large population transmissions. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Andreas Meyerhans,et al.  Temporal fluctuations in HIV quasispecies in vivo are not reflected by sequential HIV isolations , 1989, Cell.

[34]  L. V. Valen,et al.  A new evolutionary law , 1973 .