Value positions viewed through the lens of automated decision-making: The case of social services
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Stuart Culbertson. E-Government and Organizational Change , 2005 .
[2] Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al. Social media in public health care: Impact domain propositions , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..
[3] Peter Axel Nielsen,et al. Value Positions in E-Government Strategies: Something is (not) Changing in the State of Denmark , 2017, ECIS.
[4] M. Bovens,et al. From Street‐Level to System‐Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control , 2002 .
[5] Frantz Rowe,et al. Being critical is good, but better with philosophy! From digital transformation and values to the future of IS research , 2018, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[6] R. Roose,et al. Electronic Information Systems: In search of responsive social work , 2018 .
[7] Patrick Dunleavy,et al. The second wave of digital-era governance: a quasi-paradigm for government on the Web , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[8] Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al. Opportunities and challenges of digitized discretionary practices: a public service worker perspective , 2018, Gov. Inf. Q..
[9] Richard E. Susskind,et al. The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts , 2016 .
[10] Peter André Busch,et al. The Role of Contextual Factors in the Influence of ICT on Street-Level Discretion , 2017, HICSS.
[11] J. Cho,et al. Reducing Confusion about Grounded Theory and Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences , 2014 .
[12] Véronique Laurent,et al. ICT and Social Work: a Question of Identities? , 2007, FIDIS.
[13] Christian Ø. Madsen,et al. The Development in Leading e-Government Articles 2001-2010: Definitions, Perspectives, Scope, Research Philosophies, Methods and Recommendations: An Update of Heeks and Bailur , 2014, EGOV.
[14] Tom Christensen,et al. An Organization Approach to Public Administration , 2018 .
[15] A. Alavi,et al. Opportunities and Challenges , 1998, In Vitro Diagnostic Industry in China.
[16] Janine O’Flynn,et al. From New Public Management to Public Value: Paradigmatic Change and Managerial Implications , 2007 .
[17] R. Roose,et al. Creating Transparency through Electronic Information Systems: Opportunities and Pitfalls , 2018 .
[18] Ronald Leenes,et al. The ‘rule of law’ implications of data-driven decision-making: a techno-regulatory perspective , 2018, Law, Innovation and Technology.
[19] Leslie P. Willcocks,et al. Robotic process automation: strategic transformation lever for global business services? , 2017 .
[20] Gianluigi Viscusi,et al. Shaping public sector innovation theory: an interpretative framework for ICT-enabled governance innovation , 2015, Electron. Commer. Res..
[21] T. Kauppinen,et al. Rescaling inequality? Welfare reform and local variation in social assistance payments , 2014 .
[22] D. Yates,et al. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services , 1981, Michigan Law Review.
[23] C. Greve,et al. Nordic Administrative Reforms: Lessons for Public Management , 2016 .
[24] V. Bekkers,et al. Policy Implementation, Street-level Bureaucracy, and the Importance of Discretion , 2014 .
[25] Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al. Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.
[26] R. Roose,et al. Policy Rationales for Electronic Information Systems: An Area of Ambiguity , 2017 .
[27] Jean Damascène Mazimpaka,et al. The public value of E-Government - A literature review , 2019, Gov. Inf. Q..
[28] Liv Johanne Syltevik,et al. Digitalization, Street‐Level Bureaucracy and Welfare Users' Experiences , 2018 .
[29] E. Bracci,et al. Measuring public value: a conceptual and applied contribution to the debate , 2018 .
[30] P. Gillingham. From bureaucracy to technocracy in a social welfare agency: a cautionary tale , 2018, Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development.
[31] Zahir Irani,et al. Managing e‐Government: value positions and relationships , 2015, Inf. Syst. J..
[32] Jesper Holgersson,et al. Not Another New Wine in the same Old bottles - Motivators and Innovation in Local Government E-Service Development , 2017, ECIS.
[33] Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al. Digital discretion: A systematic literature review of ICT and street-level discretion , 2018, Inf. Polity.
[34] B. Bozeman,et al. Public Values , 2007 .
[35] Jeremy Rose,et al. Stakeholder theory for the E-government context: Framing a value-oriented normative core , 2018, Gov. Inf. Q..
[36] H. Tohidi,et al. Organizational culture and leadership , 2012 .
[37] Annika Andersson,et al. Use of information systems in social work – challenges and an agenda for future research , 2018 .
[38] Ellen P. Goodman,et al. Algorithmic Transparency for the Smart City , 2017 .
[39] Helle Zinner Henriksen. One Step Forward and Two Steps Back: E-government Policies in Practice , 2018 .
[40] Göran Goldkuhl,et al. Government Value Paradigms - Bureaucracy, New Public Management, and E-Government , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[41] Jeffrey B. Wenger,et al. At the Discretion of Rogue Agents: How Automation Improves Women's Outcomes in Unemployment Insurance , 2008 .
[42] Jan C. Weyerer,et al. Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges , 2018, International Journal of Public Administration.
[43] Richard Heeks,et al. Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..
[44] Jungwoo Lee,et al. Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..
[45] Jan-Erik Lane,et al. New Public Management , 2021, Bangladesh Journal of Public Administration.
[46] James G. March,et al. A primer on decision making : how decisions happen , 1994 .
[47] Agneta Ranerup,et al. Electronic Government as a combination of human and technological agency: Testing the principle of symmetry , 2007, Inf. Polity.
[48] Graham Symon,et al. The state and class discipline: European labour market policy after the financial crisis , 2018 .
[49] Frank Bannister,et al. ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..
[50] Reza Maleeh. Minds, Brains and Programs: An Information-theoretic Approach , 2015 .
[51] Renate Minas. One‐stop shops: Increasing employability and overcoming welfare state fragmentation? , 2014 .
[52] Geoff Walsham,et al. Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[53] M. Moore. Creating public value : strategic management in government , 1995 .
[54] Antonio Cordella,et al. E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..
[55] F. Reamer. The Digital and Electronic Revolution in Social Work: Rethinking the Meaning of Ethical Practice , 2013 .
[56] P. Gillingham. Decision-making about the adoption of information technology in social welfare agencies: some key considerations , 2018 .
[57] Dr. Michael Latzer. The computer says “no”? , 2010, Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin.
[58] Saggi Nevo,et al. Classifying Information Technologies: A Multidimensional Scaling Approach , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[59] Leif Sundberg. Public Values and Decision Making in the Swedish e-Government Context , 2017 .
[60] Antonio Cordella,et al. A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..
[61] S. Curry,et al. Perceptions and Use of a Web-Based Referral System in Child Welfare: Differences by Caseworker Tenure , 2017 .
[62] Patrick Dunleavy,et al. New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance , 2005 .
[63] Agneta Ranerup,et al. Rationalities in the Design of Public E-Services , 2007 .
[64] Anja Declercq,et al. Street-Level Strategies of Child Welfare Social Workers in Flanders: The Use of Electronic Client Records in Practice , 2015, British journal of social work.
[65] Tony Evans,et al. Street-Level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion , 2004 .
[66] Elin Wihlborg,et al. "The Computer Says No!" -- A Case Study on Automated Decision-Making in Public Authorities , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).