Current Practices and Challenges of Implementing Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) in Chinese Construction Enterprises

Abstract The concept of holistic risk management has helped many industries around the world create value. However, in the construction industry, practitioners have by far been focusing mainly on risk management at the project level rather than at the enterprise level. The objective of this study is to highlight the current practices and challenges of implementing Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) in Chinese construction enterprises. To achieve this objective, a literature review was first conducted to understand the major concepts of two widely-used ERM standards, the differences between ERM and Project Risk Management (PRM) and the status of ERM in China. A questionnaire survey covering large Chinese construction enterprises was then conducted to evaluate the extent to which they had actualized the ERM framework. The findings show that many Chinese construction enterprises have endeavored to improve their risk management by adopting ERM standards, establishing risk management cells, defining staff’s duties for risk management and formulating some risk management strategies. However, the empirical findings also suggest that most of them need to establish risk management cells, strategies and routines, and most of all, nurture an affirmative risk culture. Senior managers in companies and the academia are likely to find the study useful, as it discusses specific features of ERM in the construction industry, as well as the current status of ERM in China, with a view to stimulate further research.

[1]  You-Jie. Lu,et al.  The construction industry in China : its image, employment prospects and skill requirements , 2001 .

[2]  Ren-Jye Dzeng,et al.  A study of ontology-based risk management framework of construction projects through project life cycle , 2009 .

[3]  Patrick X.W. Zou,et al.  Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China , 2007 .

[4]  L. Meulbroek,et al.  The Promise and Challenge of Integrated Risk Management , 2002 .

[5]  P. Componation,et al.  The Relationship Between Organizational Culture and Enterprise Risk Management , 2009 .

[6]  René M. Stulz,et al.  Enterprise Risk Management: Theory and Practice , 2006, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance.

[7]  Birgit Pfitzmann,et al.  Optimized enterprise risk management , 2007, IBM Syst. J..

[8]  Richard P. Haigh,et al.  Tacit knowledge and organisational performance: construction industry perspective , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[9]  Charles Egbu,et al.  Knowledge production and capabilities – their importance and challenges for construction organisations in China , 2006 .

[10]  Low Sui Pheng,et al.  Enhancing buildability in China's construction industry using Singapore's buildable design appraisal system , 2007 .

[11]  M. Beasley,et al.  Information Conveyed in Hiring Announcements of Senior Executives Overseeing Enterprise-Wide Risk Management Processes , 2006 .

[12]  Clyde B. Tatum,et al.  Major characteristics of constructed products and resulting limitations of construction technology , 1988 .

[13]  Binshan Lin,et al.  Key issues and challenges of risk management and insurance in China's construction industry: An empirical study , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[14]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation , 2002 .

[15]  J. Fairclough,et al.  RETHINKING CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION AND RESEARCH - A REVIEW OF THE GOVERNMENT'S R&D POLICIES AND PRACTICES , 2002 .

[16]  Lawrence A. Gordon,et al.  Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective , 2009 .

[17]  Anthony Mills,et al.  A systematic approach to risk management for construction , 2001 .

[18]  M IMPERIALE,et al.  Meeting the challenge. , 1960, Nursing outlook.

[19]  George Ofori,et al.  Tailoring Competitive Advantages Derived from Innovation to the Needs of Construction Firms , 2010 .