A spatially explicit approach to estimating species occupancy and spatial correlation.

1. Understanding and predicting the form of species distributions, or occupancy patterns, is fundamental to macroecology and is dependent on the identification of scaling relationships that underlie the patterns observed. 2. Occupancy-abundance models based on the negative binomial distribution and Taylor's power law are spatially implicit, rather than explicit, as they include no information on the relative positions of individuals. Here we present a spatially explicit model, the spatial scaling occupancy (SSO) model, to estimate species occupancy and spatial correlation, based on join-count statistics, or a pair approximation, approach. This model provides a spatially explicit description of species range size and aspects of range structure. 3. Occupancy data from Drosophilidae species inhabiting a decaying fruit mesocosm were used to test the SSO model. Predictions from the spatially implicit and explicit models were largely equally accurate. The SSO model is thus more efficient as it is less data demanding, and more informative as it provides an estimation of spatial correlation. 4. The results also showed that species distribution patterns differ when examined with spatially implicit vs. explicit approaches; the scaling relationship between occupancy and local density identifies a focal grain for studying the scale-dependent nature of ecological relationships; and the longer the length of the sample edge, the higher the occupancy observed under conditions of spatial aggregation. 5. The SSO model presents a step towards a general scaling model for occupancy, and demonstrates that the inclusion of spatially explicit information in macroecological models warrants further attention.

[1]  William E Kunin,et al.  Scaling Down: On the Challenge of Estimating Abundance from Occurrence Patterns , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Pair Approximations for Lattice-based Ecological Models , 2000 .

[3]  S. Chown,et al.  The spatial variability of rare and common species in a gall-inhabiting Lepidoptera community , 1997 .

[4]  Belinda Reyers,et al.  Estimating the abundances of large herbivores in the Kruger National Park using presence–absence data , 2004 .

[5]  M. McGeoch,et al.  Spatial abundance structures in an assemblage of gall-forming sawflies , 2004 .

[6]  Kirk A. Moloney,et al.  Pattern and scale in a serpentine grassland , 1992 .

[7]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity , 2000 .

[8]  R. Veldtman,et al.  Spatially explicit analyses unveil density dependence , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  C. Hui,et al.  Distribution patterns of metapopulation determined by Allee effects , 2004, Population Ecology.

[11]  Jennifer L. Dungan,et al.  Illustrations and guidelines for selecting statistical methods for quantifying spatial pattern in ecological data , 2002 .

[12]  E. C. Pielou An introduction to mathematical ecology , 1970 .

[13]  S. Hurlbert Spatial distribution of the montane unicorn , 1990 .

[14]  G. Nachman,et al.  A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF THE FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DENSITY AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF A POPULATION , 1981 .

[15]  C. Hui,et al.  Dynamical complexity and metapopulation persistence , 2003 .

[16]  K. Gaston,et al.  Occupancy frequency distributions: patterns, artefacts and mechanisms , 2002, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[17]  Kevin J Gaston,et al.  Estimating Species Abundance from Occurrence , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[18]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  On species occupancy-abundance models , 2002 .

[19]  S. Levin The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[20]  J. Downing Spatial heterogeneity: evolved behaviour or mathematical artefact? , 1986, Nature.

[21]  M. Fortescue Pattern and Process: A Whiteheadian perspective on linguistics , 2001 .

[22]  R. Levins Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control , 1969 .

[23]  Joe N. Perry,et al.  MEASURES OF SPATIAL PATTERN FOR COUNTS , 1998 .

[24]  Jay M. Ver Hoef,et al.  Spatial Analysis in Ecology , 2006 .

[25]  Kevin J Gaston,et al.  Occupancy, Spatial Variance, and the Abundance of Species , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[26]  S. Chown,et al.  Predicting abundance from occupancy: a test for an aggregated insect assemblage , 2003, The Journal of Animal Ecology.

[27]  L. R. Taylor,et al.  Aggregation, Variance and the Mean , 1961, Nature.

[28]  David H. Wright,et al.  Correlations between incidence and abundance are expected by chance , 1991 .

[29]  K. Gaston,et al.  Occupancy-abundance relationships and sampling scales , 2000 .

[30]  W. Kunin,et al.  Extrapolating species abundance across spatial scales , 1998, Science.

[31]  R. Veldtman The ecology of southern African wild silk moths (Gonometa species, Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae): consequences for their sustainable use , 2007 .

[32]  K. Gaston,et al.  Pattern and Process in Macroecology , 2000 .

[33]  K. Gaston,et al.  Occupancy-abundance relationships and spatial distribution: A review , 2002 .

[34]  E. S. Pearson Biometrika tables for statisticians , 1967 .

[35]  Jennifer L. Dungan,et al.  A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis , 2002 .

[36]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Percolation theory for the distribution and abundance of species. , 2003, Physical review letters.