New Class of Radially Adjustable Stentrievers for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background and Purpose: The Tigertriever is a novel, radially adjustable, fully visible, stentriever that permits the operator to align radial expansion with target vessel diameters. This multicenter trial compared the Tigertriever’s effectiveness and safety compared with established stent retrievers. Methods: Single arm, prospective, multicenter trial comparing the Tigertriever to efficacy and safety performance goals derived from outcomes in 6 recent pivotal studies evaluating the Solitaire and Trevo stent-retriever devices with a lead-in and a main-study phase. Patients were enrolled if they had acute ischemic stroke with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥8 due to large vessel occlusion within 8 hours of onset. The primary efficacy end point was successful reperfusion, defined as core laboratory-adjudicated modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia score 2b-3 within 3 passes of the Tigertriever. The primary safety end point was a composite of 90-day all-cause mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Secondary efficacy end points included 3-month good clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) and first-pass successful reperfusion. Results: Between May 2018 and March 2020, 160 patients (43 lead-in, 117 main phase) at 17 centers were enrolled and treated with the Tigertriever. The primary efficacy end point was achieved in 84.6% in the main-study phase group compared with the 63.4% performance goal and the 73.4% historical rate (noninferiority P<0.0001; superiority P<0.01). The first pass successful reperfusion rate was 57.8%. After all interventions, successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia score ≥2b) was achieved in 95.7% and excellent reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia score 2c-3) in 71.8%. The primary safety composite end point rate of mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 18.1% compared with the 30.4% performance goal and the 20.4% historical rate (noninferiority P=0.004; superiority P=0.57). Good clinical outcome was achieved in 58% at 90 days. Conclusions: The Tigertriever device was shown to be highly effective and safe compared with Trevo and Solitaire devices to remove thrombus in patients with large-vessel occlusive stroke eligible for mechanical thrombectomy. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03474549.

[1]  D. Liebeskind,et al.  Endovascular therapy in the distal neurovascular territory: results of a large prospective registry , 2020, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[2]  T. Kohlmann,et al.  Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature , 2020, Quality of Life Research.

[3]  D. Liebeskind,et al.  Mechanical thrombectomy using the new Tigertriever in acute ischemic stroke patients – A Swiss prospective multicenter study , 2020, Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences.

[4]  Correction to: Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. , 2019, Stroke.

[5]  W. Powers,et al.  Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. , 2019, Stroke.

[6]  V. Janardhan,et al.  Site Experience and Outcomes in the Trevo Acute Ischemic Stroke (TRACK) Multicenter Registry. , 2019, Stroke.

[7]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Association Between Time to Treatment With Endovascular Reperfusion Therapy and Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated in Clinical Practice. , 2019, JAMA.

[8]  M. Mazighi,et al.  European Stroke Organisation (ESO)- European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) guidelines on mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke , 2019, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[9]  K. Fargen,et al.  Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approach for large vessel occlusion (COMPASS): a multicentre, randomised, open label, blinded outcome, non-inferiority trial , 2019, The Lancet.

[10]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Impact of Balloon Guide Catheter Use on Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes in the STRATIS Stroke Thrombectomy Registry , 2019, Stroke.

[11]  Maxim Mokin,et al.  Indications for thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke from emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO): report of the SNIS Standards and Guidelines Committee , 2019, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[12]  B. Kara,et al.  Single-center experience with the Tigertriever device for the recanalization of large vessel occlusions in acute ischemic stroke , 2018, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[13]  A. Rai,et al.  North American Solitaire Stent Retriever Acute Stroke registry: post-marketing revascularization and clinical outcome results , 2018, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[14]  A. Rai,et al.  First Pass Effect: A New Measure for Stroke Thrombectomy Devices , 2018, Stroke.

[15]  V. Janardhan,et al.  TREVO stent-retriever mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion registry , 2017, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[16]  J. Mocco,et al.  Primary Results of the Multicenter ARISE II Study (Analysis of Revascularization in Ischemic Stroke With EmboTrap) , 2018, Stroke.

[17]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  Quality of life after intra-arterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke in the MR CLEAN trial—Update , 2017, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[18]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials , 2016, The Lancet.

[19]  A. Demchuk,et al.  The Heidelberg Bleeding Classification: Classification of Bleeding Events After Ischemic Stroke and Reperfusion Therapy. , 2015, Stroke.

[20]  H. Diener,et al.  Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  M. Krause,et al.  Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  F. Sallustio,et al.  Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke , 2015 .

[26]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Endovascular therapy for stroke: getting to the "heart" of the matter. , 2014, Circulation.

[27]  K. Fargen,et al.  2C or not 2C: defining an improved revascularization grading scale and the need for standardization of angiography outcomes in stroke trials , 2013, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[28]  J. Saver,et al.  Evolution of Reperfusion Therapies for Acute Brain and Acute Myocardial Ischemia: A Systematic, Comparative Analysis , 2012, Stroke.

[29]  Elad I Levy,et al.  Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[30]  Gregory W Albers,et al.  Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularisation of large vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomised trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[31]  M. Vermeulen,et al.  What should be defined as good outcome in stroke trials; a modified Rankin score of 0–1 or 0–2? , 2008, Journal of Neurology.

[32]  R. D. de Haan,et al.  The Academic Medical Center Linear Disability Score (ALDS) item bank: item response theory analysis in a mixed patient population , 2005, Health and quality of life outcomes.