From harm reduction to legalization: The Uruguayan model for safe abortion

Advocacy by feminists and healthcare providers was essential in passing the 2012 bill legalizing abortion in Uruguay, which was primarily framed in terms of a public health imperative. Prior to legalization, a group of influential physicians had established a “harm reduction” approach consisting of pre‐ and postabortion counseling with a focus on safer abortion methods. The existence of a network of providers from this initiative facilitated the implementation of abortion services after legalization. Particularities of the Uruguayan model include a strong focus on medical abortion, and a multidisciplinary approach to patient counseling. The implementation of services was largely successful, and rates of abortion‐related morbidity and mortality have decreased. Remaining concerns include high rates of conscientious objection and insufficient human resources to staff interdisciplinary counseling teams. The focus on medical abortion has led to a lack of method choice. Finally, data collection gaps complicate monitoring and identification of barriers to access.

[1]  B. Stifani,et al.  Implementing and expanding safe abortion care: An international comparative case study of six countries , 2018, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[2]  Alejandra López-Gómez,et al.  Servicios legales de interrupción voluntaria del embarazo en Uruguay. Estrategias de los servicios públicos del primer nivel de atención , 2017 .

[3]  S. Corrêa,et al.  Reform of abortion law in Uruguay: context, process and lessons learned , 2016, Reproductive health matters.

[4]  J. Orchuela,et al.  A replication of the Uruguayan model in the province of Buenos Aires, Argentina, as a public policy for reducing abortion‐related maternal mortality , 2016, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[5]  F. Cóppola,et al.  Legal termination of pregnancy as an opportunity for expanding postabortion contraception: Experience at the Pereira Rossell Hospital, Montevideo, Uruguay , 2016, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[6]  Alejandra López Gómez Tensiones entre lo (i)legal y lo (i)legítimo en las prácticas de profesionales de la salud frente a mujeres en situación de aborto , 2016 .

[7]  Gill Harvey,et al.  PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice , 2015, Implementation Science.

[8]  R. Atun,et al.  Health-system reform and universal health coverage in Latin America , 2015, The Lancet.

[9]  L. Briozzo,et al.  Improving care of women at risk of unsafe abortion: Implementing a risk‐reduction model at the Uruguayan‐Brazilian border , 2012, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[10]  Rosario Berterretche,et al.  El Sistema Nacional Integrado de Salud en Uruguay y los desafíos para la Atención Primaria , 2011 .

[11]  D. Arán,et al.  Sistema de salud de Uruguay , 2011 .

[12]  A. Gómez,et al.  Social Consensus, Democratic Conflict: The Debate on the Decriminalisation of Abortion in Uruguay , 2008 .

[13]  J. Pons,et al.  Unsafe abortion in Uruguay , 2003, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[14]  F. Cóppola,et al.  The role of medical abortion in the implementation of the law on voluntary termination of pregnancy in Uruguay. , 2016, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[15]  L. Briozzo,et al.  Implementation of the risk and harm reduction strategy against unsafe abortion in Uruguay: From a university hospital to the entire country. , 2016, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[16]  F. Cóppola,et al.  Conscientious objection as a barrier for implementing voluntary termination of pregnancy in Uruguay: Gynecologists' attitudes and behavior. , 2016, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[17]  J. Orchuela,et al.  A replication of the Uruguayan model in the province of Buenos Aires, Argentina, as a public policy for reducing abortion-related maternal mortality. , 2016, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[18]  F. Cóppola,et al.  Legal termination of pregnancy as an opportunity for expanding postabortion contraception: Experience at the Pereira Rossell Hospital, Montevideo, Uruguay. , 2016, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[19]  A. Faúndes,et al.  Overall and abortion-related maternal mortality rates in Uruguay over the past 25years and their association with policies and actions aimed at protecting women's rights. , 2016, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[20]  Nik Johnson,et al.  La inserción del aborto en la agenda político-pública Uruguaya 1985-2013: Un análisis desde el movimiento feminista , 2013 .