Representing Artefacts as Media: Modelling the Relationship Between Designer Intent and Consumer Experience

The design literature contains many diagrammatic models that represent the relationship between how designers intend artefacts to be experienced and how they are subsequently experienced by consumers, users and other stakeholders. Despite the prevalence of such models, they remain largely disconnected from each other, both within and across design disciplines, and also disconnected from the models of communication whose basic structure they share. The existing models are therefore difficult to locate and useful conceptual developments are often overlooked. The consequences of this are that unnecessary effort is expended in developing representations that duplicate those that already exist or new models are developed from inappropriate foundations. To address such issues, this article reviews many of the existing models that can be found in the different disciplines that comprise the fields of communication and design. The most pertinent features of these models are extracted and synthesised into a generic communication-based model of design. This acts as both a guide to what the existing models emphasise and an integrated foundation from which future models might be developed.

[1]  Robert M. W. Dixon,et al.  Communication and culture : readings in the codes of human interaction , 1967 .

[2]  H. Maibom Social Systems , 2007 .

[3]  Pj Clarkson,et al.  A meta-model for communication in engineering design , 2005 .

[4]  Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza,et al.  The Semiotic Engineering of Human-Computer Interaction , 2005 .

[5]  Cal Swann,et al.  Language and Typography , 1991 .

[6]  Toni-Matti Karjalainen,et al.  Semantic Transformation in Design.Communicating Strategic Brand Identity through Product Design References , 2004 .

[7]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  What designers know , 2018, The Design Student’s Journey.

[8]  Jane Fulton Suri Thoughtless Acts?: Observations on Intuitive Design , 2005 .

[9]  Charlie Hill,et al.  Design communication , 2006, CHI EA '06.

[10]  R. Gibbs Intentions in the Experience of Meaning , 1999 .

[11]  B. Westley,et al.  A conceptual model for communications research , 1955 .

[12]  Maria Cecília Calani Baranauskas,et al.  Towards a communication model applied to the interface design process , 2001, Knowl. Based Syst..

[13]  Wilbur Schramm,et al.  The Process and Effects of Mass Communication , 1973 .

[14]  Kevin Mullet,et al.  Designing Visual Interfaces: Communication Oriented Techniques , 1994 .

[15]  James R. Beniger,et al.  Who Are the Most Important Theorists of Communication? , 1990 .

[16]  Geoffrey Broadbent,et al.  Design in architecture : architecture and the human sciences / Geoffrey Broadbent , 1973 .

[17]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing , 1992 .

[18]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design , 2004 .

[19]  Robert Jewett The Approach of the Study , 1971 .

[20]  George Gerbner,et al.  Toward a general model of communication , 1956 .

[21]  Pj Clarkson,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF CONSUMER RESEARCH ON PRODUCT AESTHETICS , 2006 .

[22]  Ge Hongyan,et al.  Aesthetics of Architecture , 2009 .

[23]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture , 1994 .

[24]  Martin Nystrand,et al.  What writers know : the language, process, and structure of written discourse , 1982 .

[25]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Shaping things: intended consumer response and the other determinants of product form , 2009 .

[26]  Ronnie B. Wilbur,et al.  Marketing and Semiotics: New Directions in the Study of Signs for Sale , 1989 .

[27]  M. Nadin Interface design: A semiotic paradigm , 1988 .

[28]  Mika Pantzar,et al.  Product Development and Changing Cultural LandscapesIs Our Future in Snowboarding? , 2002, Design Issues.

[29]  R. Waller,et al.  The typographic contribution to language Towards a model of typographic genres and their underlying structures , 1988 .

[30]  Wm J. Baker,et al.  Toward a Theory of Human Communication , 1990 .

[31]  Paolo Semama Introduzione alla ricerca sociologica , 1959 .

[32]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Product Semantics: Exploring the Symbolic Qualities of Form , 1984 .

[33]  David K. Berlo,et al.  The Process Of Communication , 1960 .

[34]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[35]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  VISUAL SENSITIVITY: COMMUNICATING POOR QUALITY , 2006 .

[36]  Janet Daley,et al.  Design creativity and the understanding of objects , 1982 .

[37]  M Quinn,et al.  The process of communication. , 1980, The Australian nurses' journal. Royal Australian Nursing Federation.

[38]  K. Fernow New York , 1896, American Potato Journal.

[39]  H. Schifferstein,et al.  Capturing product experiences: a split-modality approach. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[40]  Michele Germani,et al.  SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION METHOD FOR REVERSE ENGINEERING BASED ON AESTHETIC KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[41]  Jorge Frascara,et al.  Graphic Design: Fine Art or Social Science? , 1988 .

[42]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  The Product Ecology: Understanding Social Product Use and Supporting Design Culture , 2008 .

[43]  Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa,et al.  A semiotic engineering approach to user interface design , 2001, Knowl. Based Syst..

[44]  Anja Maier A grid-based assessment method of communication in engineering design , 2008 .

[45]  Robert Waller Four aspects of graphic communication , 1979 .

[46]  Talcott Parsons,et al.  ON THE CONCEPT OF INFLUENCE , 1963 .

[47]  W. Feek Communication works. , 1996, AIDS/STD health promotion exchange.

[48]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[49]  Geoffrey Broadbent,et al.  Architectural objects and their design as a subject for semiotic studies , 1980 .

[50]  Nathan Shedroff,et al.  Information Interaction Design: a Unified Field Theory of Design , 2000 .

[51]  P. Desmet,et al.  Framework of product experience , 2007 .

[52]  James E. Burroughs,et al.  Pursuing the meaning of meaning in the commercial world: An international review of marketing and consumer research founded on semiotics , 2004 .

[53]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Design as communication: exploring the validity and utility of relating intention to interpretation , 2008 .

[54]  John Zeisel,et al.  Inquiry by Design: Tools for Environment-Behaviour Research , 1984 .

[55]  Richard Wollheim,et al.  Art and its objects : an introduction to aesthetics , 1970 .

[56]  Dietmar Winkler,et al.  User-centred graphic design : mass communications and social change , 1997 .

[57]  H. Schifferstein The perceived importance of sensory modalities in product usage: a study of self-reports. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[58]  Bruce H. Westley,et al.  A conceptual model for communications research , 1955 .

[59]  Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza,et al.  The Semiotic Engineering of User Interface Languages , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[60]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  On the Essential Contexts of Artifacts or on the Proposition That "Design Is Making Sense (Of Things)" , 1989 .

[61]  Tetsuo Kawama,et al.  A Semiotic Approach to the Design Process , 1987 .

[62]  Dominique Vinck,et al.  Mediating and Commissioning Objects in the Sociotechnical Process of Product Design : a conceptual approach , 1995 .

[63]  R. Jakobson Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics , 2006 .

[64]  Adam Richardson The Death of the Designer , 1993 .

[65]  M. Mcluhan Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man , 1964 .

[66]  Jean-François Boujut,et al.  The Role of Objects in Design Co-Operation: Communication through Physical or Virtual Objects , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[67]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Design Research: Methods and Perspectives , 2003 .

[68]  Asghar Talaye Minai,et al.  Architecture as environmental communication , 1984 .

[69]  E. Gombrich ART AND ILLUSION: A STUDY IN THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PICTORIAL REPRESENTATION. , 1960 .