Investigation of test performance of the dual reminder A-Not A (DR A-Not A) in comparison to 3-AFC for discriminating samples of drinking water

Abstract Although the relative performance of sensory discrimination methods is well theorized in Thurstonian modeling and signal detection theory (SDT), empirical research is needed to investigate how such theorized models could be validated in complex sensory testing situations of food and beverages. This paper presents a practical procedure to utilize the existing SDT-based A-Not A sensory discrimination model based on a beta-strategy for detecting the off-sensory quality of samples of drinking water and validates the model for effective and efficient sensory quality management of food and beverages. Dual reminder A-Not A (DR A-Not A) using two tastings of the reference stimulus before evaluating every test stimulus is proposed as the optimal test procedure because it uses more sensitive test sequences and facilitates subjects’ familiarization with the standard quality of the reference. To test the performance of DR A-Not A, 3-AFC, which also uses three stimuli and is the recommended method for detecting odor or taste stimuli by ASTM, was used as a control method. In Experiment 1, 98 subjects each performed both DR A-Not A and 3-AFC. Based on these results, only sensitive subjects were selected for the next experiment, in which they were divided into two equally well performing groups. In Experiment 2, each group performed either DR A-Not A or 3-AFC over three repeated sessions. The results confirmed that the A-Not A beta-strategy was adopted for DR A-Not A and that its test performance was improved over replications. These results suggest that although DR A-Not A is an unspecified difference test method and does not use a forced-choice task, embedding the familiarization procedure for the reference renders it an effective sensory difference method for the sensory quality management of drinking water.

[1]  J. M. Harries.  Positional bias in sensory assessments , 1956 .

[2]  M. Hautus,et al.  Cognitive decision strategies adopted by trained judges in reminder difference tests when tasting yoghurt, mayonnaise, and ice tea , 2014 .

[3]  H. Lee,et al.  Optimal difference test sequence and power for discriminating soups of varying sodium content: DTFM version of dual-reference duo-trio with unspecified tetrad tests. , 2015, Food research international.

[4]  Min-A Kim,et al.  Affective discrimination methodology: Determination and use of a consumer-relevant sensory difference for food quality maintenance , 2015 .

[5]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  The performance of the dual reference duo-trio (DRDT) method using a balanced-reference mode , 2016 .

[6]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices , 1998 .

[7]  Allen Parducci,et al.  Effects of context in judgments of sweetness and pleasantness , 1979 .

[8]  H. Lawless,et al.  Taste properties of potassium chloride alone and in mixtures with sodium chloride using a check-all-that-apply method. , 2012, Journal of food science.

[9]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Decision strategies for the A Not-A, 2AFC and 2AFC-reminder tasks: Empirical tests , 2011 .

[10]  Min-A Kim,et al.  Discriminations of the A–Not A difference test improved when “A” was familiarized using a brand image , 2012 .

[11]  H. Lawless,et al.  Detection thresholds and taste qualities of iron salts , 2006 .

[12]  Michael J. Hautus,et al.  Variants of A Not-A and 2AFC tests: Signal Detection Theory models , 2009 .

[13]  Jean-Marc Sieffermann,et al.  TASTE DISCRIMINATION BY THE 3‐AFC METHOD: TESTING SENSITIVITY PREDICTIONS REGARDING PARTICULAR TASTING SEQUENCES BASED ON THE SEQUENTIAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS MODEL , 1999 .

[14]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Cognitive decision strategies adopted by consumers in reminder difference tests: Influence of the authenticity test. , 2017, Food research international.

[15]  Ji-Eun Chae,et al.  Effects of order of tasting in sensory difference tests using apple juice stimuli: development of a new model. , 2009, Journal of food science.

[16]  D. Hout,et al.  Comparative categorization method: Using 2-AFC strategy in constant-reference duo-trio for discrimination of multiple stimuli from a reference , 2017 .

[17]  Min-A Kim,et al.  Higher performance of constant-reference duo–trio test incorporating affective reference framing in comparison with triangle test , 2014 .

[18]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  The evolution of a model: A review of Thurstonian and conditional stimulus effects on difference testing , 2007 .

[19]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[20]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[21]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  MODIFICATIONS TO SENSORY DIFFERENCE TEST PROTOCOLS: THE WARMED UP PAIRED COMPARISON, THE SINGLE STANDARD DUO‐TRIO AND THE A‐NOT A TEST MODIFIED FOR RESPONSE BIAS , 1990 .

[22]  H. C. Hansen,et al.  Composition, Flavor, Chemical Foodsafety, and Consumer Preferences of Bottled Water. , 2013, Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety.

[23]  Michael J. Hautus,et al.  Investigation Of Test Performance Over Repeated Sessions Using Signal Detection Theory: Comparison Of Three Nonattribute-Specified Difference Tests 2-Afcr, A-Not A And 2-Afc , 2011 .

[24]  A. W. MacRae,et al.  Theoretical note on a practical problem : effective screening of drinking water for taints , 1995 .

[25]  A. Parducci.  Chapter 5 – CONTEXTUAL EFFECTS: A RANGE–FREQUENCY ANALYSIS* , 1974 .

[26]  John M. Ennis,et al.  Sensory Difference Tests as Measurement Instruments: a Review of Recent Advances , 2014 .

[27]  J. Hodsoll,et al.  Improving odour detection by assessors , 1999 .

[28]  D. Ennis,et al.  THE BETA‐BINOMIAL MODEL: ACCOUNTING FOR INTER‐TRIAL VARIATION IN REPLICATED DIFFERENCE AND PREFERENCE TESTS , 1998 .

[29]  Michael O'Mahony,et al.  A Comparison of Sensory Difference Testing Procedures: Sequential Sensitivity Analysis and Aspects of Taste Adaptation , 1985 .

[30]  Min-A Kim,et al.  Investigation of operationally more powerful duo-trio test protocols: Effects of different reference schemes , 2012 .

[31]  Pascal Schlich,et al.  Sensory methodologies and the taste of water. , 2010 .

[32]  M. Mitterer‐Daltoé,et al.  Selecting and Training a Panel to Evaluate the Metallic Sensation of Meat , 2012 .

[33]  J Mojet,et al.  Taste perception with age: generic or specific losses in threshold sensitivity to the five basic tastes? , 2001, Chemical senses.

[34]  M. Hautus,et al.  Cognitive Decision Strategies Adopted in Reminder Tasks by Trained Judges When Discriminating Aqueous Solutions Differing in the Concentration of Citric Acid , 2013 .

[35]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  Difference test sensitivity: Cognitive contrast effects , 2007 .

[36]  Michael J. Hautus,et al.  Unspecified duo–trio tests can be as powerful as the specified 2-AFC: Effects of instructions and familiarization procedures on cognitive decision strategies , 2016 .

[37]  P. Juslin,et al.  Thurstonian and Brunswikian origins of uncertainty in judgment: a sampling model of confidence in sensory discrimination. , 1997, Psychological review.

[38]  M. Falahee,et al.  Consumer appraisal of drinking water: Multidimensional scaling analysis , 1995 .

[39]  Michael J. McGuire,et al.  Off-flavor as the consumer's measure of drinking water safety , 1995 .

[40]  Michael J. Hautus,et al.  Comparison of performance in the A-Not A, 2-AFC, and same-different tests for the flavor discrimination of margarines: The effect of cognitive decision strategies , 2007 .

[41]  M. Hautus,et al.  Sensory discrimination by consumers of multiple stimuli from a reference: Stimulus configuration in A-Not AR and constant-ref. duo-trio superior to triangle and unspecified tetrad? , 2016 .

[42]  B. Rousseau.  Sensory discrimination testing and consumer relevance , 2015 .

[43]  Gary A. Burlingame,et al.  Development of the Flavor Profile Analysis Method into a Standard Method for Sensory Analysis of Water , 1988 .