What Good Is This Thing Called Intelligence and Why Bother to Measure It?

This article contains a review of issues and documentation concerning the possibility of "measuring " the intelligence of students. The construct validity of "intelligence, " the role of cultural context as a modifier of the meaning of test results, and the lack of meaningful predictive validity of IQ tests are discussed. A discussion of the utility of the intelligence construct and IQ measures, and their relationship to the design of beneficial pedagogy follows. Based on reviews of empirical evidence, it is concluded that the measurement of intelligence as practical, at present, makes no contribution to the design of instruction that is beneficial to students, as far as academic achievement is concerned. The main effects of the present popular intelligence measures are found to be negative.

[1]  J. Kozol Savage Inequalities: Children in America's Schools , 1992 .

[2]  H. Birx,et al.  The Mismeasure of Man , 1981 .

[3]  G. Wiggins Assessing student performance : exploring the purpose and limits of testing , 1993 .

[4]  M. Cole,et al.  The cultural context of learning and thinking. An Exploration in Experimental Anthropology. , 1971 .

[5]  A. Jensen,et al.  Bias in Mental Testing , 1981 .

[6]  Margaret C. Donaldson Children's Minds , 1978 .

[7]  Warner V. Slack,et al.  The Scholastic Aptitude Test: A Critical Appraisal , 1980 .

[8]  Albert H. Yee,et al.  Ethnicity and race: Psychological perspectives , 1983 .

[9]  William Labov,et al.  THE LOGIC OF NONSTANDARD ENGLISH , 1970 .

[10]  A. Hilliard Psychological Factors Associated with Language in the Education of the African-American Child , 1983 .

[11]  R. Lewontin Race and Intelligence , 1970 .

[12]  Alexandra K. Wigdor,et al.  Ability Testing: Uses, Consequences, and Controversies , 1982 .

[13]  K. A. Heller,et al.  Placing children in special education : a strategy for equity , 1982 .

[14]  H. Fairchild Scientific racism: The cloak of objectivity. , 1991 .

[15]  D. Lipsky,et al.  Beyond Separate Education: Quality Education for All , 1989 .

[16]  P. Ostwald,et al.  Language and Poverty , 1972 .

[17]  Michael Wertheimer,et al.  The Raising of Intelligence: A Selected History of Attempts to Raise , 1986 .

[18]  Thomas Hehir,et al.  Special Education at the Century's End: Evolution of Theory and Practice Since 1970 , 1992 .

[19]  A. Hilliard IQ Testing as the Emperor’s New Clothes , 1984 .

[20]  Rosalie Cohen,et al.  Conceptual Styles, Culture Conflict, and Nonverbal Tests of Intelligence , 1969 .

[21]  Thomas M. Skrtic,et al.  The Special Education Paradox: Equity as the Way to Excellence , 1991 .

[22]  J. Oakes,et al.  Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. , 1986 .

[23]  A. Montagu,et al.  Man's Most Dangerous Myth: The Fallacy of Race. , 1975 .

[24]  H. Gardner,et al.  Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences , 1983 .

[25]  Carol S. Lidz,et al.  Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential. , 1987 .

[26]  鈴木 鎮一,et al.  Nurtured by Love: The Classic Approach to Talent Education , 1969 .

[27]  J. Helms Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in standardized cognitive ability testing , 1992 .

[28]  A. Hilliard Back to Binet , 1989 .

[29]  C. Lidz Practitioner's Guide to Dynamic Assessment , 1991 .

[30]  D. W. Fulker,et al.  The Science and Politics of IQ , 1975 .