''It's Harder than We Thought It Would be": A Comparative Case Study of Expert---Novice Experimentation Strategies

Scientific inquiry is a complex skill. Aspiring physicians need to learn these skills so that they can be educated consumers of medical research as well as being collaborators in different kinds of clinical trials. But school science often fails to provide the kind of authentic tasks needed to help students develop appropriate reasoning skills and epistemological beliefs. In this study, we compared a group of expert cancer researchers with four groups of fourth year medical students (the "novice" groups) engaged in the task of designing a clinical trial to test a new cancer drug using a computer-based modeling tool, the Oncology Thinking Cap. Although the experts and novices reached similar end- points, their reasoning processes differed considerably. For the experts, this was a task that required learning about the drug they were testing. The novices needed to learn about de- signing clinical trials, particularly about how variables interacted with each other, as well as learning about the drug. One of the major lessons learned by the novice student groups was just how complex clinical trial design really is. C

[1]  R. Day,et al.  Tumor Biology Modeling Workbench for Prospectively Evaluating Cancer Treatments , 1998 .

[2]  Kevin Dunbar,et al.  Constraints on the experimental design process in real-world science , 1996 .

[3]  N. Nersessian Should physicists preach what they practice? , 1995 .

[4]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Knowledge Based Solution Strategies in Medical Reasoning , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  K. Dunbar HOW SCIENTISTS REALLY REASON: SCIENTIFIC REASONING IN REAL-WORLD LABORATORIES , 1995 .

[6]  Hope J. Hartman Metacognition in teaching and learning: An introduction , 1998 .

[7]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[8]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning To Solve Problems. Technical Report No. 9. , 1987 .

[9]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Instructional, Curricular, and Technological Supports for Inquiry in Science Classrooms , 1998 .

[10]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective , 1996 .

[11]  V. Devita,et al.  Cancer : Principles and Practice of Oncology , 1982 .

[12]  J. Mintzes,et al.  Teaching Science for Understanding: A Human Constructivist View , 1998 .

[13]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  The integration of a novice user interface into a professional modeling tool , 1998, AMIA.

[14]  R. Glaser,et al.  Expertise in a complex skill: Diagnosing x-ray pictures. , 1988 .

[15]  David Klahr,et al.  Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  P. Feltovich,et al.  Issues of expert flexibility in contexts characterized by complexity and change , 1997 .

[18]  J. Trafton,et al.  Exploration in the Experiment Space : The Relationship between Systematicity and Performance , 1998 .

[19]  C. E. Hmelo,et al.  Developing inquiry skills through scaffolded use of a simulation , 1998 .