Exploring Robust Design Capabilities, Their Role in Creating Global Products, and Their Relationship to Firm Performance

With the increasing desire for products suitable for widely varying markets worldwide, this study offers insight into capabilities associated with successful robust design in global product markets. These robust design capabilities (i.e., the possibility for success under varying circumstances or scenarios) are a potential organizational response to rapid change and uncertainty, which also improve the likelihood of product acceptance on a global basis. From literature, executive interviews, and anecdotal evidence, four capabilities associated with robust product design are derived: (1) functional; (2) aesthetic; (3) technological; and (4) quality based. A model is proposed and an empirical test conducted that considers the moderating influence of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between these robust capabilities and firm performance. The findings suggest that the use of robust design capabilities are affected by uncertainty and have an important influence on firm performance and speed to market. Specifically, the product development process tends to be characterized by aesthetic and technological robust design capabilities in more certain environments and functional robust design capabilities in more uncertain environments when seeking to improve firm performance. Alternatively, technological design capabilities in more certain environments and functional design capabilities in more uncertain environments are associated with improved speed to market.

[1]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management , 1992 .

[2]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Customer-driven product development through quality function deployment in the u.s. and japan , 2000 .

[3]  D. Mowery,et al.  Managing Product Definition in High-Technology Industries: A Pilot Study , 1994 .

[4]  Ida Gremyr,et al.  Use and knowledge of robust design methodology: A survey of Swedish industry , 2003 .

[5]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[6]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: four cases in the microcomputer industry , 1988 .

[7]  L. Phillips.  Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing , 1981 .

[8]  T. Levitt.  THE GLOBALIZATION OF MARKETS , 1983 .

[9]  S. Hunt.  Resource-Advantage Theory: An Evolutionary Theory of Competitive Firm Behavior? , 1997 .

[10]  Leslie A. Perlow,et al.  THE TIME FAMINE: TOWARDS A SOCIOLOGY OF WORK TIME. , 1996 .

[11]  Beverly B. Tyler,et al.  The effects of executives experiences and perceptions on their assessment of potential technological alliances , 1998 .

[12]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Paul Gardiner,et al.  Design and competition in engineering , 1984 .

[14]  Sandra M. Huszagh.  Global marketing: an empirical investigation , 1986 .

[15]  Gregory N. Stock,et al.  Building Dynamic Capabilities in New Product Development through Intertemporal Integration , 2003 .

[16]  P. Kotler,et al.  DESIGN: A POWERFUL BUT NEGLECTED STRATEGIC TOOL , 1984 .

[17]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[18]  Mel Yamamoto,et al.  The impact of product aesthetics on the evaluation of industrial products , 1994 .

[19]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[20]  Xavier de Groote,et al.  The flexibility of production processes: a general framework , 1994 .

[21]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Unobserved Heterogeneity as an Alternative Explanation for 'Reversal' Effects in Behavioral Research , 2000 .

[22]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[23]  D. Teece,et al.  Strategic management and economics , 1991 .

[24]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[25]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modular Architectures in the Marketing Process , 1999 .

[26]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[27]  J. Hauser,et al.  The House of Quality , 1988 .

[28]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[29]  R. Sanchez.  Strategic flexibility in product competition , 1995 .

[30]  Arvind Sahay,et al.  Emerging Role of Technology Licensing in the Development of Global Product Strategy: Conceptual Framework and Research Propositions , 1996 .

[31]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[32]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Evaluating service encounters: The effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. , 1990 .

[33]  Abdessamad Kobi,et al.  Robust Designs for Quality Improvement , 2003 .

[34]  Peter E. Kennedy.  A Guide to Econometrics , 1979 .

[35]  Alan MacCormack,et al.  Managing the Sources of Uncertainty: Matching Process and Context in Software Development , 2003 .

[36]  Y. Wind.  THE MYTH OF GLOBALIZATION , 1986 .

[37]  John C. Narver,et al.  Strategic Management Journal Research Notes and Communications Customer-led and Market-oriented: Let's Not Confuse the Two , 2022 .

[38]  Nelson P. Repenning.  Understanding fire fighting in new product development , 2001 .

[39]  J. March.  Footnotes To Organizational Change , 1980 .

[40]  Van Doren,et al.  Industrial design : a practical guide , 1940 .

[41]  Allen M. Weiss,et al.  Investment in technological innovations: An option pricing approach , 1997 .

[42]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition , 1995 .

[43]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[44]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees: , 1992 .

[45]  George S. Yip.  Total Global Strategy II , 2002 .

[46]  R. Rumelt.  Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm , 1984 .

[47]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Design and marketing of new products , 1980 .

[48]  L. Perlow.  The Time Famine: Toward a Sociology of Work Time , 1999 .

[49]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Managing New Product Definition in Highly Dynamic Environments , 1998 .

[50]  B. Chakravarthy.  Adaptation: A Promising Metaphor for Strategic Management , 1982 .

[51]  Paul E. Spector.  Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? , 1987 .

[52]  B. Kogut,et al.  Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry , 1994 .

[53]  S. Jain,et al.  Standardization of International Marketing Strategy: Some Research Hypotheses , 1989 .

[54]  Robert W. Veryzer.  Key factors affecting customer evaluation of discontinuous new products , 1998 .

[55]  R. Reed,et al.  Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1990 .

[56]  Richard A. D'Aveni,et al.  Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering , 1994 .

[57]  M. Kotabe,et al.  Offshore Sourcing: Reaction, Maturation, and Consolidation of U.S. Multinationals , 1994 .

[58]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[59]  Sian Mooney,et al.  The Influence of Riparian Protection Measures on Residential Property Values: The Case of the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds , 2002 .

[60]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity , 1997 .

[61]  Peter R. Dickson,et al.  Toward a General Theory of Competitive Rationality , 1992 .

[62]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[63]  P. Varadarajan,et al.  Strategic Adaptability and Firm Performance: A Market-Contingent Perspective , 1989 .

[64]  J. Wagner,et al.  Percept-Percept Inflation in Microorganizational Research: An Investigation of Prevalence and Effect , 1994 .

[65]  Wm. E. Souder,et al.  Contingent Product Design and Marketing Strategies Influencing New Product Success and Failure in U.S. and Japanese Electronics Firms , 1997 .

[66]  R. Rust,et al.  Why Improving Quality Doesn't Improve Quality (or Whatever Happened to Marketing?) , 1993 .

[67]  Eli M. Noam,et al.  Broadcasting In Italy: An Overview , 1987 .

[68]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Interaction of Design Hierarchies and market Concepts in Technological Evolution : Research Policy , 1985 .

[69]  R. Rothwell.  Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s , 1992 .

[70]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Resource-Based View of the Firm in Two Environments: The Hollywood Film Studios From 1936 to 1965 , 1996 .

[71]  Artemis March,et al.  Usability: The new dimension of product design , 1994 .

[72]  Raghu Garud,et al.  CHARGING COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS IN NETWORK INDUSTRIES: AN EXPLORATION OF SUM MICROSYSTEMS' OPEN , 1993 .

[73]  Peter H. Bloch.  Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response: , 1995 .

[74]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[75]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[76]  David Lei,et al.  Dynamic Core Competences through Meta-Learning and Strategic Context , 1996 .

[77]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[78]  M. Hitt,et al.  The new competitive landscape , 1995 .

[79]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  International Diversification: Effects on Innovation and Firm Performance in Product-Diversified Firms , 1997 .

[80]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  Product quality alignment and business unit performance , 2001 .

[81]  M. Kotabe,et al.  The role of strategic alliances in high‐technology new product development , 1995 .

[82]  R. Garud,et al.  Changing competitive dynamics in network industries: An exploration of sun microsystems' open systems strategy , 1993 .

[83]  Douglas L. MacLachlan,et al.  Fax Surveys: Return Patterns and Comparison with Mail Surveys , 1996 .

[84]  B. Hamilton,et al.  Market position, resource profile, and governance: linking Porter and Williamson in the context of international courier and small package services in Japan , 2001 .

[85]  Andrew Hargadon,et al.  When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light , 2001 .

[86]  S. Kotha.  Mass customization: Implementing the emerging paradigm for competitive advantage , 1995 .

[87]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[88]  Paul Gardiner,et al.  The strategic management of re‐innovation , 1989 .

[89]  G. Huber,et al.  Retrospective reports of strategic‐level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy , 1985 .

[90]  L. J. Bourgeois,et al.  Strategy and Environment: A Conceptual Integration , 1980 .

[91]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin's q , 1988 .

[92]  George S. Day,et al.  Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority , 1988 .