Evaluation of impact factors on VOC emissions and concentrations from wooden flooring based on chamber tests

Abstract In this study, the impact factors of temperature, relative humidity (RH), air exchange rate, and volatile organic compound (VOC) properties on the VOC (toluene, n-butyl acetate, ethylbenzene, and m,p-xylene) specific emission rates (SERs) and concentrations from wooden flooring were investigated by chamber test for 8 days. The tested wood in this study is not common solid wood, but composite wood made of combined wood fibers. The experiments were conducted in a stainless-steel environmental test chamber coated with Teflon. The experimental results within 8 days of testing showed that, when the temperature increased from 15 to 30 °C, the VOC SERs and concentrations increased 1.5–129 times. When the RH increased from 50% to 80%, the VOC concentrations and SERs increased 1–32 times. When the air change rate increased from 1 to 2 h−1, the VOC concentrations decreased 9–40%, while the VOC SERs increased 6–98%. The relations between the boiling points of the VOCs and each of the normalized VOC SERs and concentrations were linear with negative slopes. The relations between the vapor pressures of the VOCs and each of the normalized VOC SERs and concentrations were linear with positive slopes. At 15 °C, RH50%, the relations between the diffusivities of VOCs and each of the normalized VOC equilibrium SERs and concentrations were linear with a positive slope.

[1]  Peder Wolkoff,et al.  Organic compounds in indoor air—their relevance for perceived indoor air quality? , 2001 .

[2]  Chris Netten,et al.  Temperature and humidity dependence of formaldehyde release from selected building materials , 1989, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[3]  Ying Xu,et al.  An improved mass transfer based model for analyzing VOC emissions from building materials , 2003 .

[4]  P Wolkoff,et al.  Organic compounds in office environments - sensory irritation, odor, measurements and the role of reactive chemistry. , 2006, Indoor air.

[5]  Peder Wolkoff,et al.  Sensory and chemical characterization of VOC emissions from building products : impact of concentration and air velocity , 1999 .

[6]  Peder Wolkoff Volatile Organic Compounds Sources, Measurements, Emissions, and the Impact on Indoor Air Quality , 1995 .

[7]  F. Murray,et al.  Evaluation of Total Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Adhesives Based on Chamber Tests , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[8]  S. Sollinger,et al.  Indoor pollution by organic emissions from textile floor coverings: Climate test chamber studies under static conditions , 1994 .

[9]  Indoor air quality: organic pollutants. Report on a WHO meeting. , 1989, EURO reports and studies.

[10]  Geo Clausen,et al.  Air quality in a simulated office environment as a result of reducing pollution sources and increasing ventilation , 2002 .

[11]  P. Fanger,et al.  Impact of Temperature and Humidity on Perception of Indoor Air Quality During Immediate and Longer Whole‐Body Exposures , 1998 .

[12]  I. Andersen,et al.  Indoor air pollution due to chipboard used as a construction material , 1975 .

[13]  James E. Dunn,et al.  Compensating for sink effects in emissions test chambers by mathematical modeling. Report for June 1986-February 1987 , 1988 .

[14]  H. Schauenburg,et al.  Chamber testing of organic emission from building and furnishing materials. , 1990, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  Charles J. Weschler,et al.  Workgroup Report: Indoor Chemistry and Health , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[16]  Peder Wolkoff,et al.  Impact of air velocity, temperature, humidity, and air on long-term voc emissions from building products , 1998 .