ExosCE: A legal-based computational system for compliance with exoskeletons’ CE marking

Abstract Wearable robots are devices intended to improve the quality of users’ life by augmenting, assisting, or substituting human functions. Exoskeletons are one of the most widespread types of wearable robots, currently used extensively in medical applications (and also for industrial, assistive, or military purposes), thus governed by regulations for medical devices and their conformity assessment. On top of that, manufacturers must also specify if their exoskeletons can be categorized as machines and, therefore, additionally apply a number of requirements mandated from machinery regulations. This work focuses on capturing both the abovementioned requirements enacted by the Medical Devices Directive 2017/745 and the Machinery Directive 2006/42 into a single framework. It formalizes into Rules the Conformity Assessment procedures regarding the marketability of exoskeletons indicated by the CE marking (“Conformité Européene”). These Rules, expressed in the Positional-Slotted Object-Applicative (PSOA) RuleML code, were complemented by representative Facts based on real-life cases of commercialized exoskeletons. Additional Exoskeletons Facts can be included by users from other forms (such as MS Excel) and translated into the PSOA RuleML code through the provided Python script. The open-source Exoskeletons’ CE mark (ExosCE) Rules KB was tested by querying in the open-source PSOATransRun system. The ExosCE Rules prototype can assist in the compliance process of stakeholders and in the registration of exoskeletons with a CE mark.

[1]  Jan F. Veneman,et al.  Safety Standardization of Wearable Robots—The Need for Testing Methods , 2017 .

[2]  Christian Biemann,et al.  What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain? , 2017, ArXiv.

[3]  Harold Boley,et al.  Object-Relational Rules for Medical Devices: Classification and Conformity , 2018, OTM Conferences.

[4]  Eduard Fosch Villaronga Legal and regulatory challenges for physical assistant robots , 2015, eChallenges e-2015 Conference.

[5]  Ann-Marie Hughes,et al.  Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in Wearable Robotics: Perspectives from the Work of the COST Action on Wearable Robots , 2018 .

[6]  Juan C. Moreno,et al.  Lower Limb Wearable Robots for Assistance and Rehabilitation: A State of the Art , 2016, IEEE Systems Journal.

[7]  Yasuhisa Hasegawa,et al.  Wearable Robotics for Motion Assistance and Rehabilitation [TC Spotlight] , 2018, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[8]  Trieu Phat Luu,et al.  Risk management and regulations for lower limb medical exoskeletons: a review , 2017, Medical devices.

[9]  John C. Mitchell,et al.  A Formalization of HIPAA for a Medical Messaging System , 2009, TrustBus.

[10]  Yoky Matsuoka,et al.  Prosthetics, exoskeletons, and rehabilitation , 2007 .

[11]  Leonard O'Sullivan,et al.  Standards for the safety of exoskeletons used by industrial workers performing manual handling activities: a contribution from the Robo-Mate project to their future development , 2015 .

[12]  Gurvinder S. Virk,et al.  ISO 13482 - The new safety standard for personal care robots , 2014, ISR 2014.

[13]  Harold Boley,et al.  Port Clearance Rules in PSOA RuleML: From Controlled-English Regulation to Object-Relational Logic , 2017, RuleML+RR.

[14]  Petros Stefaneas,et al.  A Rule-Based Model for Compliance of Medical Devices Applied to the European Market , 2019 .

[15]  Ben Goldacre,et al.  FDAAA TrialsTracker: A live informatics tool to monitor compliance with FDA requirements to report clinical trial results , 2018, bioRxiv.

[16]  Gurvinder S. Virk,et al.  Towards realising wearable exoskeletons for elderly people , 2019, AIR 2019.

[17]  Panagiotis Frangos,et al.  Formalizing Air Traffic Control Regulations in PSOA RuleML , 2018, RuleML+RR.

[19]  Harold Boley,et al.  Aligning, Interoperating, and Co-executing Air Traffic Control Rules Across PSOA RuleML and IDP , 2019, RuleML+RR.

[20]  Sundeep Mishra FDA, CE mark or something else?—Thinking fast and slow , 2017, Indian heart journal.

[21]  Annie I. Antón,et al.  Validating Existing Requirements for Compliance with Law Using a Production Rule Model , 2009 .

[22]  Antonio Migliore On the new regulation of medical devices in Europe , 2017, Expert review of medical devices.

[23]  Eduard Fosch Villaronga,et al.  ISO 13482:2014 and Its Confusing Categories. Building a Bridge Between Law and Robotics , 2016 .

[24]  Harold Boley,et al.  Computational Regulation of Medical Devices in PSOA RuleML , 2018, RuleML+RR.

[25]  Yoky Matsuoka,et al.  Prosthetics, exoskeletons, and rehabilitation [Grand Challenges of Robotics] , 2007, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[26]  E. Fosch Villaronga,et al.  Legal Frame of Non-social Personal Care Robots , 2016 .